Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Electronic Home Plate Umpiring In The Near Future??


Recommended Posts

So another buzz today on ESPN about MLB installing an electronic umpiring system for balls and strikes.  While the home plate ump will remain behind the plate (why?) to judge other issues this is a * attack on baseball and sports in general. While I like instant replay let's not get crazy with technology. To all young folks that may not agree with me you must know the future is for artificial intelligence and robotics so when you turn 40 what do suppose your future  employment prospect will be? :) Also, if MLB goes hi-tech with Robby Robot umpires will they holler out "strike" and ball"? Yogi Berra is turning over in his grave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, King Colt said:

So another buzz today on ESPN about MLB installing an electronic umpiring system for balls and strikes.  While the home plate ump will remain behind the plate (why?) to judge other issues this is a * attack on baseball and sports in general. While I like instant replay let's not get crazy with technology. To all young folks that may not agree with me you must know the future is for artificial intelligence and robotics so when you turn 40 what do suppose your future  employment prospect will be? :) Also, if MLB goes hi-tech with Robby Robot umpires will they holler out "strike" and ball"? Yogi Berra is turning over in his grave.

Refs and umpires in sports generally favor the home team. There is a lot of cheating in sports, whether it's something small like calling a strike a ball or vice versa, calling a foul or not calling a foul in basketball when it's not supposed to happen, or taking back points in football or giving a team yards on phantom penalties such as pass interference. Whether you want to argue if refs or umpires do this on purpose, you can't argue the human emotion if they are a fan of the home team and unconsciously are biased toward them. There have been a lot of questionable calls over the years in every major sport, and this will bring a lot more accuracy the more it happens eventually. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

The problem with it is that you'd still have to have a home plate umpire to judge check swings...foul tips..hit by pitches....and safe-out plays at home

...and if youd still have an umpire..what's the logic of not letting him call balls and strikes.?

 

..and even setting that aside.....my understanding is that the strike zone is different with every batter depending on his size. The strike zone also has depth...A high pitch can clip the top of the strike zone at the back of the plate. How many cameras would you need to judge those factors.

 

Its not as simple an issue as they make it sound on the talk shows

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With baseball you have the human error aspect about a strike zone and that make sit interesting.  An ump might consistently call some outside pitches strikes making it harder for the batter but it still has intrigue.  The more you try to "perfect" a game the less impact little things have and then it will just be HR derby.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Flus had a low tolerance for loafing and not giving full effort, and it’s possible Bradley might not be as demanding.
    • Here's the deal, an NFL QB can't be inaccurate more than 2 or 3 passes per game.  If he's inaccurate with 5 or more passes, even if its placed on a wrong shoulder, he's a first down/drive killer (can't sustain drives).  Not to mention drops or picks.     Dazzling accuracy with 85% of the throws isn't good enough for the NFL.  About 90% to 95% of a QBs passes need to be accurate, IMO.
    • He has almost no experience. He needs the reps and it’s going to be really ugly at times.    Touch and timing. Chemistry with his receivers. Trusting what he sees. All of that will take time and because AR has such limited experience it’ll take a lot of time.    Before the season started I said this isn’t the Colts’ year. That we shouldn’t expect much. I very much stand by that. This is about getting AR ready for the NFL. The biggest issue so far has been the rest of the team not stepping up. Why are people blaming AR when players on their 2nd or 3rd contracts are playing like amateurs? They don’t look prepared. 
    • Its hard to make any kind of judgment after two games.    Just a spitball observation, his throwing motion looks weird.  It's as if his entire body is moving/wiggling when he throws, instead of rotating a shoulder over a steady body and hips, and I don't mean when he's rolling out.   Also, in both games, his plant foot has slipped on two or three different dropbacks when about to throw.  One resulted in a TD to AP, but plant foot issues is a sign of poor lower body discipline.   Basic stuff, IMO.
    • Richardson reminds me a bit of watching some really big, muscular basketball players shooting free throws. They lack the touch to do it well - and look like they may not ever develop that soft touch.   But I don't know whether that analogy really fits or not. And there are no doubt some really big, muscular basketball players who shoot well and have a soft touch.    You could also think about the powerful home run hitter who can hit the ball a mile, but struggles at making consistent contact. He might practice forever at improving this, but will always be a low batting average, high strikeout player.    Just because you keep practicing something - particularly something you've already been practicing a long time - doesn't mean you'll become particularly good at it. But there are also examples of athletes who become much more skilled as their careers progress.   I think I disagree with people who say Richardson will definitely become a star and those who say he definitely won't. There's just no way of knowing if he'll improve enough on things like the ability to consistently throw a soft short-medium pass in the spot where the receiver needs to have it. 
  • Members

    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,887

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Waylon

      John Waylon 5,441

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pelt

      Pelt 1,245

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DougDew

      DougDew 9,154

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 2,072

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 92

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DattMavis

      DattMavis 408

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • davidshoff

      davidshoff 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solid84

      Solid84 7,397

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 18,604

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...