Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2017-2018 Indiana Pacers and Everything NBA Thread


Recommended Posts

Just now, Bluefire4 said:

Wow we've only taken 2 free throws the entire game?? I've never seen that before.

 

Yeah the refs have been horse &&&t but they're just clearly being more physical.  Pacers really aren't a good defensive team so if you can disrupt their offense by being physical and playing good D this is the outcome :tvsmash:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Malakai432 said:

 

Yeah the refs have been horse &&&t but they're just clearly being more physical.  Pacers really aren't a good defensive team so if you can disrupt their offense by being physical and playing good D this is the outcome :tvsmash:

Yeah this is a bad matchup between their defense on the pick and roll and the attention Russell Westbrook brings which allows Steven Adams to dominate. Let's see if McMillan can find some other offensive sets that get us back in the game.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, crazycolt1 said:

Vic was bad on the three pointers tonight

 

Yeah it was a rough night, he was 9 for 26, 0 free throws though???  21-12 fouls.  

 

They also were beat 26-18 in assist, 17-11 in offensive rebounds, 52-42 in overall rebounds BUT still had a chance to win considering how bad they played.  Hopefully they will take their frustrations out on the Pistons Friday.  Detroit is one of those physical teams though even though they aren't that good can give the Pacers fits.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A dominant rebounding team that is good defensively will not go our way unless they have an awful shooting night.

 

I know everyone wanted this win today but don't act like the Thunder are not the superior team. Westbrook is better than anybody we have. Steven Adams is better than both of our bigs. PG is still a top 20 player.

 

Don't act like we lost to the Bulls or Hawks here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bluefire4 said:

A dominant rebounding team that is good defensively will not go our way unless they have an awful shooting night.

 

I know everyone wanted this win today but don't act like the Thunder are not the superior team. Westbrook is better than anybody we have. Steven Adams is better than both of our bigs. PG is still a top 20 player.

 

Don't act like we lost to the Bulls or Hawks here.

 

Yeah they would probably be a top 5 team in the East for sure.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think the games under 250 will be due to any lack of skill on Ryan's part.    I believe certain teams matchup very well versus our receivers, and we will see an immediate focus on running the ball.    Combine both of those factors with the reality that JT is the best running back in the league, there are many games where we will just chew clock and take our yards at will. If they can win with Ryan throwing 8 passes, they will do it. 
    • im surprised your so high on ryan.  not that i disagree, just didn't expect it from you. I voted he would get about 4200-4300, mainly becaue i think JT repeats again for about 16-1900 yards. 
    • According to Boomer Esiason Murray is not well liked by his teammates.
    • Your comment about guaranteeing that Matt Ryan will NOT throw for under 250 yards in a single game jumped off the page to me.      So I looked this up before posting here.    Last year, only two quarterbacks threw for more than 5,000 yards.  Brady with just over 5300 yards and Herbert with just over 5000.    For the record, Brady had FIVE games of under 250 yards and Herbert had SIX.   So if those guys had multiple games of under 250, your safest bet is that Matt Ryan will too.   That’s as close to a guarantee as you can get.    Ryan is likely to average roughly 250 a game, maybe a little more.   Which means he’ll have a good number more than 250, and a good number below.   
    • If the offense is more balanced, that will mean more O snaps.  We were 21st in plays per game on O. And we would have been even lower had we not had all the turnovers.  That's pretty darn weak. We were 12th with Rivers. 17th with JB. 5th with Luck.  Having more passing yards does not mean you have to have substantially less running yards.  You can be top 10 in both areas. Buffalo, Dallas, and AZ were.  At the end of the day, most of the SB favs, are good at passing (top 10).  More times than not, that's what it takes. 
  • Members

    • Moe

      Moe 174

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AwesomeAustin

      AwesomeAustin 1,681

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,394

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 675

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • C_Lew

      C_Lew 109

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NYFAN

      NYFAN 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • LiveAndLetAddai

      LiveAndLetAddai 666

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jshipp23

      jshipp23 400

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dunk

      Dunk 699

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 1,061

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...