Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

I like the Kendall Reyes pick, or maybe Kawann Short later on. As much as it'd be nice to land Fleener, we have more pressing needs than TE. Even if Clark goes, Tamme is more than capable. If we do draft one, I'd like Ladarius Green late in the draft.

Andrew Luck

Chase Minnifield

Kevin Zeitler

Kawann Short

Ryan Broyles

QB: Manning/Luck

RB: Brown/Addai

FB: Felton?

WR's: Garcon, Collie, Broyles (if Santonio Holmes is cut by Jets, wouldn't surprised to see him land here, had a good relationship with Arians at Pittsburgh. Also wouldn't surprise me if we picked up Stanford WR Chris Owusu as a UDFA)

TE: Tamme, Clark?

LT: Castonzo

LG: Reitz (would be nice to get Grubbs or Nicks but can't see it)

C: Saturday/Pollak

RG: Zeitler

RT: Ijalana

DE: Anderson

NT: Brandon McKinney (Ravens, FA) - would like Soliai but can we afford him?

DE: Short/Tyler Brayton/Brackett?

OLB: Mathis

ILB: Angerer

ILB: Brackett

OLB: Hughes? Brackett? (not sure where Brackett fits in this system)

CB: Powers

CB: Minnifield

FS: Bethea

SS: Zbikowski (Ravens, FA)

Let me know your thoughts on this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the Kendall Reyes pick, or maybe Kawann Short later on. As much as it'd be nice to land Fleener, we have more pressing needs than TE. Even if Clark goes, Tamme is more than capable. If we do draft one, I'd like Ladarius Green late in the draft.

Kawann Short is returning to Purdue for his senior season. I'm very high on Fleener. 6'6 and very fast, may not be as physical as Gronkowski but the kid has definite ability. He may be the first TE off the board. If he or Kendall Wright fall to 34 I would seriously consider taking them if Barron/Poe are off the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kawann Short is returning to Purdue for his senior season. I'm very high on Fleener. 6'6 and very fast, may not be as physical as Gronkowski but the kid has definite ability. He may be the first TE off the board. If he or Kendall Wright fall to 34 I would seriously consider taking them if Barron/Poe are off the board.

Ah I didn't realise that, sorry man! I'm a huge Fleener fan, I'd love him but like I say, not sure he's our biggest need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mocks look good, but IMO after the Colts get rid of some veteran drain on the salary cap, the draft is Offensive heavy. Luck in first. Then you need to replace og/ot/wrx2/te/rb/c. That is 8draft picks of our 10. Where do you think the Defense is going to draft. These are going to be needed if you want to keep your rookie QB healthy. This my opinion of how the draft is going to go. I hope I am wrong, but we all have seen what happens to rookie QBs that don't have the protection and help around them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Tamme is a free agent...and if we do cut Clark, then Eldridge is our only remaining TE

Possibly; some half decent free agents knocking about in John Carlson, Joel Dreessen...I think Tamme stays to be honest, but it would be good to have a really athletic Tight End.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.Andrew Luck

2 coby fleener TE Stanford (giving Luck a familiar weapon)

3 kendall reyes Dt/De Uconn (could play both DT/DE)

4 Dequan Menzie CB Alabama (desperatly Needed CB)

5 CB/Dt

6. CB/DT/LB

7. DT

I like Reyes in Pagano's defense. Very Antonio Smith-like, to me. Only saw him a couple of times, but I think he'd be a good fit. High motor, great size at 5-tech end, good interior pass rush at 3-tech tackle. His stock is climbing right now, but he'll probably still be available at #34. I don't know about #65.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Reyes in Pagano's defense. Very Antonio Smith-like, to me. Only saw him a couple of times, but I think he'd be a good fit. High motor, great size at 5-tech end, good interior pass rush at 3-tech tackle. His stock is climbing right now, but he'll probably still be available at #34. I don't know about #65.

Walter football has his at the final pick of the second round but the teams in that area aren't needing his position

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Round 1 - #15 A. Xavier Worthy, WR, Texas B. Brian Thomas, WR, LSU C. Brock Bowers, TE, Georgia   Round 2 - #46  A. Edgerrin Cooper, LB, Texas A&M B. Marshall Kneeland, DE, Western Michigan C. Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State   Round 3 - #82 A. Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon B. Darius Robinson, DE/DT, Missouri C. Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State   Round 4 - #117 A. Jalyx Hunt, DE, Houston Christian B. Mason McCormick, OG, South Dakota State C. Malik Washington, WR, Virginia   Round 5 - #151 A. Beaux Limmer, OC, Arkansas B. Tanor Bortolini, OC, Wisconsin C. Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville   Round 6 - #191 A. Decamerion Richardson, CB, Mississippi State B. Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto C. Nick Gargiulo, OC, South Carolina   Round 7 - #234 A. Millard Bradford, SS, TCU B. Mark Perry, FS, TCU C. Dalton Tucker, OG, Marshall   BONUS: Will the Colts trade the #15 pick this year?  A: Yes, they will trade back.  
    • Yeah... Richardson needs players who can separate and who can get open deep. IMO "give the inaccurate QB a contested catch receiver with large catch radius" is one of the tropes that hasn't proven to work well. Contested catches have about 50-55% success rate even with the best of contested catch receivers and with relatively accurate QBs... now if you think AR's accuracy is not good, drop that rate even more. The best way to give a relatively inaccurate QB better chance to complete passes is to give him a WR who separates and and who is open so the QB would have more of a margin for error to throw the ball a little behind or ahead or a little higher or lower than ideal. (we are not talking about uncatchable balls here... those will be uncatchable for anyone really). In that regard, one thing I would agree about is - we need WRs who have good hands and have good ball skills.   And this is ignoring that AR has indeed been pretty good with his accuracy on passes at intermediate and long range. His biggest problem coming into the league was the short stuff and he was already showing improvements in that deparment before he got injured.    And Worthy is the WR who created the most separation from anybody in this draft :   
    • Richardson  accuracy  on deep balls is his strength.  Hence why you pair an elite deep threat in worthy.
    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
  • Members

    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 6

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rob220

      rob220 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dark Superman

      Dark Superman 1,778

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...