Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

rock8591

2017 NFL Draft - Day 3 Thread - starts at NOON EST

Recommended Posts

Banner has nice size but bad mobility...Doesn't move well at all. A project type of guy, probably needs to be told to loose about 30lbs at least. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone joked on twitter that they should put Zach Banner and Margus Hunt on every kick block unit, LOL :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, DougDew said:

A wasted pick.  If we want a huge slow OLineman, we can keep Good.

 

Agree...wasted pick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 picks back to back coming up soon. This is where late round gems are made.

 

I am thinking RB and LB. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, wig said:

 

I would hope people could figure out we didn't trade a 4th for a 5th. 

 

Evidently not all...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, wig said:

 

I would hope people could figure out we didn't trade a 4th for a 5th. 

Right, just saying when I saw the trade & was checking the NFL tracker, (I'm out & about so I'm not watching the coverage) I couldn't figure what the trade was for, the tracker had updated the 5th round pick, but hadn't & still haven't updated that 4th, so I could see how one could've been confused, that is all...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how is adding oline dept a waste at this point? we don't know what he can be. They have been following the board and maybe the scouts and staff see some traits they like. Key words for ballard have been unique and this guy has some size that you don't see often at guard or tackle. If he can play and they think he can play give him a chance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we go with Marlon Mack here, our hands may be forced to with 143 or 144

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Calling Banner a wasted pick despite him being an OL and without having seen him play...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Coltsman1788 said:

There goes Gallman.  Fuuuuuuuuug! 

 

Draft McNichols....please.  For the love of...

Sushi?  :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Coltsman1788 said:

There goes Gallman.  Fuuuuuuuuug! 

 

Draft McNichols....please.  For the love of...

Excellent as pass receiver.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

Agree...wasted pick

I imagine we get this kid in the weight room and on a nutritional diet. Slim him down and add some more muscle and things may look much different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dgambill said:

I imagine we get this kid in the weight room and on a nutritional diet. Slim him down and add some more muscle and things may look much different.

Banner has said hes already slimming down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Majin Vegeta said:

Apparently Banner is going to play T.. :thinking:

I think Clark is our future left tackle and we will still need a right tackle. Constanzo's play has been inconsistent to say the best and he is getting older. Doubt he gets another contract from us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now, Anthony Walker Jr. for LB depth or Jalen Myrick for CB depth would be nice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Tampa works best when you have a strong front and or an offense that can score early and often.
    • i like the new rule better than trying to fix onside kicks.  they are almost impossible to catch when they are expected now   they could make adjustments to the kick but im not really a fan of them, just feels like they got a lucky bounce when they do convert 
    • They tabled the “4th and 15” option for teams coming from behind.    If the elimination of a running start is what the problem is, why can’t they just allow the kicking team 2 or 3 extra yards, so they have a better chance to get to the ball? I may be oversimplifying the issue but to me, it makes more sense than the 4th and 15 option.      Thoughts?   https://www.nfl.com/news/nfl-tables-fourth-and-15-onside-kick-alternative-proposal  
    • His explosion is fine, it's his coverage that stinks. I really hope he practiced more on coverage than explosion. He's already great explosion vs the run, and has an awesome nose for the ball in that aspect.   Oke is just the opposite. Stinks on the inside vs the run, but does well in coverage. He's much better vs the run when playing on the outside in space.
    • I like Woods, but he had one good year for us (2017). In 2018 he really struggled, and by mid season lost his starting job and played less than 20 snaps a game. His PFF rating dropped a bunch too. There's a reason he wasn't brought back. He played decent last year with Seattle but his snaps and performance dropped off later in the year before he was suspended for PED use. He's with the Jags now, so it'll be interesting to see how he does. He just turned 33 and is still 330lbs.... Not sure I'd take those odds. Had Leonard not missed 3 games, his production would have been similar to 2018. Had zero to do with Woods being gone. Like I said earlier, Woods played sparingly the last half of the 2018 season, and didn't play in the last two games at all. I think you're reaching here. And Stewart's PFF rating in 2019, was higher than Woods PFF rating... And Leonard also struggled with both abdominal and back issues lat in 2019 which likely limited his production too. Again, nothing to do with Woods. 2 things... We were ranked 7th best vs the run in 2019 (vs 8th in 2018, and 26th in 2017 which was Woods' best year), which is the only downs Woods would have played on.... Our problem was coverage (and Charmin soft zone D), not vs the run.... Two, we played 4 games vs top 10 rushing teams. Leonard had double digit tackles in 3 of 4, and was struggling with injury the 4th. Again, Woods' absence didn't hurt us vs the run (nor did it hurt our LB performance), which is the only downs he traditionally played. Ballard has talked about the need for a 3 tech since for at least a couple years now, so doubt his going after Buckner had anything to do with Dungy. It was a no brainer opportunity.... Ballard should have addressed 3 tech last year, but he simply chose to address DE first. And everyone that runs a C2 knows it's critical to have a good 3 tech. Also,,,Ballard and Dungy both specifically talked about 3 tech, not NT (Woods).  Not so worried about depth. Sure we're a few key injuries away from pain.... but all teams are... Rock was playing top 10 (pff wise) the last half of the year. Not to worried about him. Rhodes is an upgrade over Desir if he stays healthy. That's a big IF though, so I share your concern. I'd love to see them resign Desir (and Geathers) later once he has time to test the waters. Moore will be fine, and Carrie is a decent backup who can handle NB or CB2. I'm hopeful about Rogers to, although it will be later in the year before he gets a chance.   At S, Hooker should improve. I share your concerns with Willis too. Hoping Blackmon can take over SS on passing downs. Odum is a quality backup, and like I said, would love to bring Geathers back on a team friendly deal. Any competent QB could carve up our soft zone given how bad our pass rush was. I agree, our O will help our D a bunch. I also think we could see less-soft zone from our DBs now.
  • Members

    • gspdx

      gspdx 534

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 1,925

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chloe6124

      Chloe6124 7,606

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 36,766

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 11,862

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dogg63

      Dogg63 436

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Black0ut117

      Black0ut117 31

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jcrane

      Jcrane 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AZColt11

      AZColt11 1,719

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superfly

      Superfly 4,102

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...