2017 NFL Draft - Day 3 Thread - starts at NOON EST

[PrincetonTiger 8,706]

Just now, ColtsUrUs said:

Why doesn't it say we have the 143 pick anywhere? 

It is listed everywhere I look

[chad72 9,736]

1 minute ago, ColtsUrUs said:

Why doesn't it say we have the 143 pick anywhere? 

 

It does, on my CBS Sports draft tracker list.

[Jay Kirk 7,496]

Ballard is looking shrewd at this point . I like his style lets see what he does with these picks, and then in UDFA

[Coltsman1788 3,177]

Have Gallman, McNichols or Jamal White been taken yet?  Outside of those possible options  I'm not really interested in anyone else available  at running back. 

 

Looks like we might be stuck with  pretty much the same quality  of backfield as last year. That's the problem with trying to rely on finding mid to late round gems to address RB position.  Can't have it all though.  

[PrincetonTiger 8,706]

What a name

[chad72 9,736]

At this point, double down on CB, LB and OL depth, IMO, and get a specialist RB

[richard pallo 1,796]

Maybe he trades for Kendricks or Richardson? 

[il vecchio 114]

1 minute ago, Jay Kirk said:

Ballard is looking shrewd at this point . I like his style lets see what he does with these picks, and then in UDFA

With all the free agents he signed and the 8 draftees, this may be a harder than usual year for Colts' UDFA to make it.

[wig 898]

Very happy with the move after the run of guys I like. 

 

Would have preferred moving up to get one but will never knock patience. 

[PrincetonTiger 8,706]

Wow Broncos lost a draft pick this year in the Bibbs trade

[Jay Kirk 7,496]

1 minute ago, il vecchio said:

With all the free agents he signed and the 8 draftees, this may be a harder than usual year for Colts' UDFA to make it.

Good point but there always seem to be some that sneak in because of Special Teams play.

[BrentMc11 19,441]

9 minutes ago, DougDew said:

I like that our draft picks are grouped.  Can pick some players in bunches.

We could go Moe, Curly and Larry 

[PrincetonTiger 8,706]

Everything is working out for us

[Jay Kirk 7,496]

3 minutes ago, wig said:

Vwry happy with the move after the run of guys I like. 

 

Would have preferred moving up to get one but will never knock patience. 

At this point hes just looking for solid players

[Andrew Luck fan club 2,345]

Great pick there for the browns. 

[GoColtsGo5150 225]

If he falls to us, Desmond King would be a good pick for the nickel. Him, Hooker and Wilson with all those ball skills

[Buck Showalter 3,800]

13 minutes ago, James said:

 

Stupid post. Extra picks are better at this point if they don't like any prospect at 121.

 

Edit: a 4th and a 5th. Yeah, that's much better than staying if they don't like any player at 121.

 

Please, quit belly-aching.

At first the tracker was just showing the 5th, not the 4th too, I think anyone would question that trade...

[krunk 11,102]

damonte kazee ain't a bad pick as a Nickel back. Or maybe Desmond King.

[NewColtsFan 19,046]

 

First,  Ballard made a good trade to move down in the 4th and pick up a 5th.       Well done.

 

Second,   don't be surprised if he does the exact same thing in the 5th with one of our two picks.     Move down in the round  and pick up a later 5th and a 6th to go with it.        If it's possible,   I think Ballard will want to do that.

 

[PrincetonTiger 8,706]

Sharpe is huge

[polk_high_allstar 46]

Do you think we could pull the trigger on Brantley with 137th pick?

[RockThatBlue 8,254]

6 minutes ago, Majin Vegeta said:

Great pick there for the browns. 

I actually think the browns have quietly had a solid draft. At least on paper anyway...

[PrincetonTiger 8,706]

1 minute ago, RockThatBlue said:

I actually think the browns have quietly had a solid draft. At least on paper anyway...

Agreed

[Colts_Fan12 4,935]

I'd take Brantley would be killer value 

[BrentMc11 19,441]

Jake, Butt I am sure he will be out awhile. 

[polk_high_allstar 46]

Not seeing a lot of teams with a need @ RB in front of us.  Think we target one with the 143th or 144th pick.

[Colts_Fan12 4,935]

I wouldn't put it past the stupid patriots to take Brantley tho 

[BrentMc11 19,441]

Just now, Colts_Fan12 said:

I wouldn't put it past the stupid patriots to take Brantley tho 

Who you call in' stupid?  

[BrentMc11 19,441]

Is NFL keeping up with picks? ESPN sucks

[Coltsman1788 3,177]

Our picks are so far back in the 4th round that we basically now have 4 5th round picks. Hard for me to get excited much about 5th round or later picks. Lots of talent already flying off the board. 

[Boiler_Colt 3,720]

Eagles get their next Sproles

[egg 614]

25 minutes ago, ColtsUrUs said:

Why doesn't it say we have the 143 pick anywhere? 

I think it may be 2018....which would be great....high 4th instead of low 4th

[krunk 11,102]

3 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

I wouldn't put it past the stupid patriots to take Brantley tho 

I could see the Cowboys as well

[RockThatBlue 8,254]

1 minute ago, BrentMc11 said:

Is NFL keeping up with picks? ESPN sucks

ESPN is so behind its aggrevating. 

[Jay Kirk 7,496]

1 minute ago, BrentMc11 said:

Is NFL keeping up with picks? ESPN sucks

I'm watching NFL

[BrentMc11 19,441]

Just now, Jay Kirk said:

I'm watching NFL

Good coverage?

[Jay Kirk 7,496]

2 minutes ago, egg said:

I think it may be 2018....which would be great....high 4th instead of low 4th

Its showing on NFL

[waka waka 142]

Just now, BrentMc11 said:

Good coverage?

coverage is pretty good on the NFL network today.

[Cynjin 2,826]

Just now, BrentMc11 said:

Good coverage?

 

Yes it is, I just took a look at espn, it's like they're on a 10 minute delay.

[IinD 2,283]

I didn't think espn had any viewers this year...heard that Wingo guy for a minute and haven't tuned in since.