Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

CR91

2017 NFL Draft Day 2 Thread

Recommended Posts

Lots of secondary going and better teams have OL needs. Could be some nice lbs for us next rd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, grmasterb said:

Or get on Twitter and follow.

Good Lord...

Or maybe just respect the forum communities overall wish that they don't want it spoiled...

Is that too much to ask???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ar7 said:

I never thought there would be this many receivers and tight ends draft at this point but i'm totally fine as it drops guys like Wilson. I wasn't going to be upset if the Colts went offense in either of the first two rounds but it's good to see two defensive players taken. Hopefully Wilson can contribute right away. If he can it should be a big help to Vontae.

Don't know much about Wilson but if he and Hooker play to the hype plus if Hankins and the other pick ups play even average I think we just moved from 30th in D to top 15. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, csmopar said:

So who do we get later tonight, last chance guesses anyone?

Rivers, Bashem, Feeney, Anzalone. Maybe Tim Williams will still be there

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rivers or Willis in round 3. If not, then Terrell Basham. Tim Williams I wouldn't mind either. Zach Cunningham too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, csmopar said:

Don't know much about Wilson but if he and Hooker play to the hype plus if Hankins and the other pick ups play even average I think we just moved from 30th in D to top 15. 

 

I'll cross my fingers that Green becomes a Tight End coverage machine also :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hankins, Simon, Sheard, Hooker, and Wilson + Vontae looks much better than last season already - all young guys. Glad Butler is back too. Still a ways to go. I bet Ballard goes after a Pass Rusher next? If we took a RB next though I wouldn't be too upset, if Foreman or Hunt is the pick. Our O.Line still needs help but I think Kelly will be much better anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Come on really? This again?

Whats not to like about Ozzies draft.  We would have a CB Opposite VD from day one and the quality edge to fill our two biggest needs.. Maybe we can get an EDGE to back up Sheard in the 3rd and maybe Balt will find a FS in the third.    I don't know if there will be an EDGE in the third that has quickness, bend, and ability to stop the run.  Not sure if there will be a FS in the third that can run fast to where the QB throws the ball. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, csmopar said:

Don't know much about Wilson but if he and Hooker play to the hype plus if Hankins and the other pick ups play even average I think we just moved from 30th in D to top 15. 

That becoming true would be music to my ears !...........GO COLTS !!!!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Reminder Everything Will BevOkay

I for one like our draft so far :thmup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ColtsUrUs said:

Guess we're building the baby legion of boom. :rock:

 

 

Legion of Blue 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the Wilson pick and I actually picked him with my 2B selection in Dr. T's draft, but I have a question for those in the know.  With Awuzie still available I was thinking he would go before Wilson, but is the fact that he's still out there because he is considered more of a slot CB than an outside CB?  Or do people just think Wilson is better?  Just wondering.  For the record I would have been pleased with either.  Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DougDew said:

Whats not to like about Ozzies draft.  We would have a CB Opposite VD from day one and the quality edge to fill our two biggest needs.. Maybe we can get an EDGE to back up Sheard in the 3rd and maybe Balt will find a FS in the third.    I don't know if there will be an EDGE in the third that has quickness, bend, and ability to stop the run.  Not sure if there will be a FS in the third that can run fast to where the QB throws the ball. 

I like Ozzie's Draft but what is not to like about our Draft was my point to my Post. You just immediately poo poo'd our pick and was praising Ozzie's. I personally like our Picks better. Wilson looks like he will be a Good player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are still lots of good LB's available for the 3rd round.Lawson, Cunningham, Willis, Williamson, McMilan, Anzalone, Beckwith and many others still not picked.

Also some solid DT/DE options still around.

Lets get some defence this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, ColtsUrUs said:

Guess we're building the baby legion of boom. :rock:

 

 

Yeh. Hooker is obviously our Thomas. We have our Chancellor in Geathers. Quincy is Sherman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I like Ozzie's Draft but what is not to like about our Draft was my point to my Post. You just immediately poo poo'd our pick and was praising Ozzie's. I personally like our Picks better. Wilson looks like he will be a Good player.

I like ours too.  I like Ozzies better.  But thats okay, Ozzies one of the best.

 

I hope we can get an edge in the 3rd that can be more than just a situational speed rusher.  I don't know if Baltimore will be looking for a FS that can do more than run fast to where the QB throws the ball.  But if thats all they want in a FS, they should be able to find one in the third. 

 

Hey, Grigson got Henry Anderson in the third, so maybe we can get a gem edge in the thrid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, CopenhagenColt said:

There are still lots of good LB's available for the 3rd round.Lawson, Cunningham, Willis, Williamson, McMilan, Anzalone, Beckwith and many others still not picked.

Also some solid DT/DE options still around.

Lets get some defence this year.

 

I think Cunningham and Willis will be gone soon. Surprised they are still there, especially the lattter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DougDew said:

I like ours too.  I like Ozzies better.  But thats okay, Ozzies one of the best.

 

I hope we can get an edge in the 3rd that can be more than just a situational speed rusher.  I don't know if Baltimore will be looking for a FS that can do more than run fast to where the QB the ball.  But if thats all they want in a FS, they should be able to find one in the third. 

Fair enough. I like both actually. It's like splitting hairs between the 2. I am glad we went Corner tonight. I now hope we go Pass Rush.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, PrincetonTiger said:

 I might be gone for a while

Strong to Severe Storms heading for TigerTown

Be safe. We just went thru a tornado warning. I've got some pretty good wind damage myself. Again, stay safe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Finball said:

 

I think Cunningham and Willis will be gone soon. Surprised they are still there, especially the lattter.

I'll be surprised if they're there when we pick in the third, but we'll still have solid options at LB, if that's what the management want.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Fair enough. I like both actually. It's like splitting hairs between the 2. I am glad we went Corner tonight. I now hope we go Pass Rush.

Me too.  Grigson got Henry Anderson in the 3rd, so hopefully Ballard can do as well and get a similar quality edge player in the 3rd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, csmopar said:

Be safe. We just went thru a tornado warning. I've got some pretty good wind damage myself. Again, stay safe

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. Up until that neck injury I don’t think manning missed a snap his entire career here.
    • Andrew has had 3 maybe 4 injuries since the beginning of his career, manning only missed one season here. So no worries the bad luck was all Bob's. 
    • that guy is too short, has no wheels, and has to take a time out after every 6 attempts. will never make it.. nice jugs though
    • The facts.. a hung jury (twice) mistrial with most voters having sided for the alleged accuser/victim... both times.     She (prosecution) didn't drop the charges, the school (judge/jury) did.  She wanted round 3.  She wanted a full yes or no vote (4-1 or 5-0) either way, not we're split 3-2 so we'll just call it against the majority vote and designate as "Not Responsible" because it isn't 4 or more votes either way. - 'Case closed'.     There were questions (and other items) from the accuser that were never allowed in or asked in follow up questioning.  I think one of the changes to the Stanford Title IX hearing rules is to also allow an attorney to be not only in attendance but to also perform all duties of representation.  And an outside group determines what is admissible as questions/evidence, follow questions, etc...     At some level, it did, and many things at Stanford were changed after. At the  minimum, it was a mistrial x2, with no conclusive verdict either way. Then school (not prosecution) drops the case.   So she really needed to report this to both the school, and also the Police.  But with what evidence does she have to convince the LEO?  Guess the gals need some hidden body cam w/audio these days, like many folks do with dash cams (like me and my wife's cars...) and be their own TMZ...   Video, apparently the only way things get rectified anymore...     No worries, at least we know each others positions.  All is good.     Except to have (at some level) differing story from a another high achieving Stanford student about another high achieving Stanford student-   https://www.collegesimply.com/colleges/california/stanford-university/admission/     We don't even know for certain they ever got the FULL story, but articles I've read suggest that the Stanford Panel repressed/disallowed many/most of her interrogating questions and supplemental follow up inquiries to be asked of the accused.  Unless someone directly asks her directly, how could you answer as to whether her whole story was even heard or not?   If you are not truly interested to fully know those answers, then you don't ask.  At least, that's my perspective.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...