Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

CR91

Gareon Conley accused of sexual assault (edit)

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, MPStack said:

Wow, this has to be about the stupidest draft class period.  Throwing millions away for weed, punching girls and now this. Good Lord.

Agreed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets wait it out and see how it develops. The fact that the media is reluctant to publish the name gives some reason for caution about the allegation. I hope the police do their job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, stitches said:

Lets wait it out and see how it develops. The fact that the media is reluctant to publish the name gives some reason for caution about the allegation. I hope the police do their job.

Agreed but the situation if true is very scary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, stitches said:

Lets wait it out and see how it develops. The fact that the media is reluctant to publish the name gives some reason for caution about the allegation. I hope the police do their job.

 

Teams will find out by themselves so I don't see how the media holding back the name really helps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CR91 said:

 

Teams will find out by themselves so I don't see how the media holding back the name really helps

Agreed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Teams will find out by themselves so I don't see how the media holding back the name really helps

It's about keeping the name out of public eye, more than keeping it from teams IMO. Teams will probably get the name. If I were to guess they don't want the guy's name to be dragged through the mud 2 days before the draft in case the allegations are not substantiated. It's usually not the job of the media to do that, and this is why I find it weird that they are not releasing the name. The only reason I can think of is - they migh have doubts about the veracity of the claims. Of course, all of this is just speculation on my part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, stitches said:

It's about keeping the name out of public eye, more than keeping it from teams IMO. Teams will probably get the name. If I were to guess they don't want the guy's name to be dragged through the mud 2 days before the draft in case the allegations are not substantiated. It's usually not the job of the media to do that, and this is why I find it weird that they are not releasing the name. The only reason I can think of is - they migh have doubts about the veracity of the claims.

But the teams are the ones who determine where player X goes in the draft

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, stitches said:

It's about keeping the name out of public eye, more than keeping it from teams IMO. Teams will probably get the name. If I were to guess they don't want the guy's name to be dragged through the mud 2 days before the draft in case the allegations are not substantiated. It's usually not the job of the media to do that, and this is why I find it weird that they are not releasing the name. The only reason I can think of is - they migh have doubts about the veracity of the claims. Of course, all of this is just speculation on my part.

 

Doesn't matter to us though. We're not the ones giving him millions of dollars

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

But the teams are the ones who determine where player X goes in the draft

 

9 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Doesn't matter to us though. We're not the ones giving him millions of dollars

 

Yes, but it will be the team's reputation on the line at draft night with all the media circulating stories about how team X has just drafted a rapist. Imagine the team knows with high level of certainty that the guy is innocent(through private investigators, through police work, etc). Would they still draft him where he's projected to go? Or would most teams just decide to save themselves the hastle and reputation hit and draft a player with clean image instead? Even if the guy gets cleared afterwards, a good portion of people would still think he did it and the team will still be the team that drafted a rapist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, richard pallo said:

So, which 1st. rd prospect is from Cleveland?

Trubisky. But I'm not sure there is enough info to conclude that it's a player from Cleveland.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, stitches said:

Trubisky. But I'm not sure there is enough info to conclude that it's a player from Cleveland.

Okay then which first round players have ties to Cleveland or Ohio

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, PrincetonTiger said:

Okay then which first round players have ties to Cleveland or Ohio

 

Hooker lattimore Conley Ohio state

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, PrincetonTiger said:

Okay then which first round players have ties to Cleveland or Ohio

Trubisky - he's from Mentor, Ohio

Malik Hooker - Ohio state

Marshon Lattimore - Ohio State

Gareon Conley - Ohio State

Raekwon McMillan - Ohio State

Deshone Kizer - he's from Toledo, Ohio

 

?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The more interesting thing is to follow up who is represented by this agent - Kevin Spellacy? I don't know where to look up this info. If anyone knows, you are welcome to share.

 

Edit: my bad, this is his lawyer, not agent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, stitches said:

The more interesting thing is to follow up who is represented by this agent - Kevin Spellacy? I don't know where to look up this info. If anyone knows, you are welcome to share.

 

Edit: my bad, this is his lawyer, not agent.

You could probably do the same thing by looking at who Spellacy is the lawyer for

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Teams will find out by themselves so I don't see how the media holding back the name really helps

How about a lawsuit? The whole thing seems shady, the article says that there are 3 witness who didn't see anything wrong and if he drops because an history without any kind of corroboration they can sue.

 

I think a lot of you guys overreacted for a history that has little to none truth behind.

 

This is a draft week's article, if something really happen then Rapoport would be reporting it, all the insiders won't sleep until the draft it's over they have their ears pretty open right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be shocked if it was someone from Ohio State. A few of their prospects have had some off the field issue the last couple of years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

Accused doesn't mean guilty.  

 

No, but it doesn't mean innocent either. Just have to wait and see

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, stitches said:

Lets wait it out and see how it develops. The fact that the media is reluctant to publish the name gives some reason for caution about the allegation. I hope the police do their job.

 

Also the fact that the lawyer says he has 3 witnesses saying his player and the woman where never alone in the hotel makes me suspicious about it.  

 

Standard denials do not usually include specifics about witnesses or outright saying that the player was never alone with her.  The are usually very general and just say "this is a lie" blah blah blah.

 

When a lawyer is willing to say a number of witnesses and completely deny that the 2 where alone together to me it sounds like he's pretty sure of his case.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jact.stark said:

How about a lawsuit? The whole thing seems shady, the article says that there are 3 witness who didn't see anything wrong and if he drops because an history without any kind of corroboration they can sue.

 

I think a lot of you guys overreacted for a history that has little to none truth behind.

 

This is a draft week's article, if something really happen then Rapoport would be reporting it, all the insiders won't sleep until the draft it's over they have their ears pretty open right now.

I don't believe anyone here is overreacting just discussing how this could devastating to all sides

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How does a sexual assault aggressor go unnamed?  Forget about the football prospect part - I don't think Ive ever even heard of that before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

Also the fact that the lawyer says he has 3 witnesses saying his player and the woman where never alone in the hotel makes me suspicious about it.  

 

Standard denials do not usually include specifics about witnesses or outright saying that the player was never alone with her.  The are usually very general and just say "this is a lie" blah blah blah.

 

When a lawyer is willing to say a number of witnesses and completely deny that the 2 where alone together to me it sounds like he's pretty sure of his case.  

That could also be lawyer speak

 

At this point it is hard to tell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

Accused doesn't mean guilty.  

He's been charged the article says there's no charges if after 2 weeks there's no charges then the whole thing just seems more shady, this is an click bait thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, OffensivelyPC said:

How does a sexual assault aggressor go unnamed?  Forget about the football prospect part - I don't think Ive ever even heard of that before.

The privileges of being famous

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, PrincetonTiger said:

The privileges of being famous

Charges haven't been filed yet.  If they had it would be public knowledge.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

The privileges of being famous

Even then, you don't see celebrities going unnamed in stories like this.  I haven't anyway.  I am just curious how this is even possible in the first place.  TMZ or one of those types of sites I would think could unearth that information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, PrincetonTiger said:

B/R is reporting that it is Conley

Yep, there it is lol.  Man is that disappointing.  Not enough time before the draft to clear his name I don't think

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Hypothetical.

 

The media releases the name.      The kid plummets in the draft.

 

Then the girl is found to either be lying,  or, she can't prove her case.      Or, he can prove his case to the satisfaction of law enforcement or a jury.

 

Then what?      The player has been damaged to the amount of millions of dollars.     Odds are she doesn't have that.      How he is to re-coup that loss?         

 

His name will be revealed perhaps by the end of the week, or maybe sometime next week.

 

This is not as cut and dry as it might appear.      Right now, he's only been accused,  he's not charged...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not nearly as bad, or as big of deal as you are making it out to be. Even in the stories I have seen and read today it's not getting that much attention.  The Colts not going after the money they could get back is what's getting the press.    The booing won't have any effect on FAs; If anything, the absence of an elite QB will be a bigger issue when it comes to attracting FAs.        
    • Yeah...I shouldn't have said active. I meant games he has appeared in.   But if you just look at active games...he will have played in more than half...which is still pretty incredible for a guy drafted into the situation he was. 
    • I do agree with Jimmy our owner too. Andrew isn't really being selfish when you remember all the millions of dollars he leaving on the table.   If you're heart's not in the game anymore because your body keeps betraying you, I could see why turning the page to something else seems appealing to Luck. You watch his press conference & can't help but feel for the guy & what he's endured since he first got here in 2012. He raves about Mathis, Wayne, Hilton, Adam V. The guy doesn't have a malicious bone in his body man. He loves INDY & her diehard fans. The guy is genuinely broken up emotionally over this decision man. He didn't reach it lightly at all.    The funny thing about rage & anger is this: It's only a burden to those who carry it & refuse to release it & let it go over time. Fans have a right to be upset just remember that no one was hoodwinked, swindled, or lied to here. The situation was abrupt, unexpected, even awkward perhaps, but I honestly don't think this news was withheld on purpose by anybody inside the Colts organization. Life teaches us to adapt all the time. The only constant is change & our organization will handle this change with professionalism, dignity, & a sense of renewed purpose like we always do. 
    • I am pretty sure he was active for all 16 games plus two playoff games last year.
    • I would guess not.    He honestly looks like a 155 pound incel there who has been on a bender for 3 weeks.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...