Jump to content
Click here to get your free tickets for Colts Training Camp today!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

21isSuperman

The 2017 Colts Forum Mock Draft

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, jseg18 said:

With the 37th pick the Los Angeles Rams select . Garett Bolles.

 

:Cry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cards trade 3rd and 4th(119) for colts 3rd 

 

@tweezy32 confirm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, tweezy32 said:

Colts and arizona made a trade.

Arizona gets colts #90

Colts get Arizona's #94 and #119

@CR91 confirm

 

Confirm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, tweezy32 said:

Confirm 

 

Wait you moved down? I thought it was in the middle. No deal. Sorry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CR91 said:

 

Wait you moved down? I thought it was in the middle. No deal. Sorry

... Kinda confirmed it...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, tweezy32 said:

... Kinda confirmed it...

 

 

On come on moving up 4 spots isn't worth that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

On come on moving up 4 spots isn't worth that

It is if depending on who's there at that spot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, tweezy32 said:

It is if depending on who's there at that spot

 

Person I want will be long gone which is why I was trying to move up. This was an oversight on my part

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MPStack said:

It`s getting stupid again!

 

 

Sorry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, MPStack said:

It`s getting stupid again!

 

 

I promise I won't contribute to the stupidity anymore moving forward, that is my pledge till round 4 is over. :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this round is going slower than the 1st. Need to pick this thing up as I`m on Berlin time! haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, tweezy32 said:

It is if depending on who's there at that spot

Just FYI - that's usually why you don't make trades like this until the pick being traded away is on the clock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Didn't something similar happen a few years ago in the actual draft

It involved the Ravens and Vikings, if I recall correctly.  One team ran out of time.  The NFL rule is that if the team runs out of time, the next team can make a selection with the previous team being allowed to submit their selection at any time.  I think the Vikings ran out of time, so the Ravens submitted their pick before the Vikings submitted theirs, even though the Vikings were ahead of the Ravens.  At the end of the day, both teams got who they wanted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All these trades are beginning to confuse me...

 

With the recent departure of Kony Ealy, the Panthers select Caleb Brantley, DL, Florida

 

@loudnproudcolt and the Bengals are on the clock

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CR91 said:

Confirm

 

1 hour ago, tweezy32 said:

Confirm 

 

I'm going to give CR91 a break and consider the trade void.  Mistakes happen and he made an oversight.  However, I won't be as forgiving in the future.  Once a trade is publicly confirmed, it is final, even if an oversight is made.  It is the responsibility of a GM to make sure he/she knows what is being dealt before confirming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 21isSuperman said:

 

 

I'm going to give CR91 a break and consider the trade void.  Mistakes happen and he made an oversight.  However, I won't be as forgiving in the future.  Once a trade is publicly confirmed, it is final, even if an oversight is made.  It is the responsibility of a GM to make sure he/she knows what is being dealt before confirming.

 

thanks 21. also the jags pick needs to be changed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CR91 said:

 

Sorry

It's been quite realistic.  No doubt the cards would trade a proven player on his rookie deal like Buchanan and replace him with a rookie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

It's been quite realistic.  No doubt the cards would trade a proven player on his rookie deal like Buchanan and replace him with a rookie

 

last year of his rookie deal and would command top dollar, plus their LBers were a weakness and now i made it a strength 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, CR91 said:

 

last year of his rookie deal and would command top dollar, plus their LBers were a weakness and now i made it a strength 

No you didn't,  You brought in rookies who bust at a rate of over 40%.  No GM would roll with three rookie LBers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jvan1973 said:

No you didn't,  You brought in rookies who bust at a rate of over 40%.  No GM would roll with three rookie LBers

 

better then an aging vet and a backup

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

better then an aging vet and a backup

Buchanan was neither of those.  But I digress.  Carry on

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if your coming up in the next 5 picks message me, 21isuperman, or warghost your top 5 choices, so we can go faster

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jvan1973 said:

Buchanan was neither of those.  But I digress.  Carry on

 

wasnt referring to him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 21isSuperman said:

It involved the Ravens and Vikings, if I recall correctly.  One team ran out of time.  The NFL rule is that if the team runs out of time, the next team can make a selection with the previous team being allowed to submit their selection at any time.  I think the Vikings ran out of time, so the Ravens submitted their pick before the Vikings submitted theirs, even though the Vikings were ahead of the Ravens.  At the end of the day, both teams got who they wanted.

 

The Vikes got borderline HoF DT Kevin Williams. It worked out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

Hey guys, I had to do some things today. What pick are we on?

the bengals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

The Vikes got borderline HoF DT Kevin Williams. It worked out.

Wasn't it two teams that jumped you guys?  Byron Leftwich was one,  not sure on the other.  I'm at work or I would Google it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

Wasn't it two teams that jumped you guys?  Byron Leftwich was one,  not sure on the other.  I'm at work or I would Google it

I was way off.  I though the Ravens were involved.  It was Jacksonville and Carolina that jumped them

 

http://www.espn.com/nfldraft/columnist?id=1545117

 

The Vikings were forced on Saturday to make a rare "pass" on their first-round choice, the seventh pick overall, when they were unable to complete a proposed trade with the Baltimore Ravens before the 15-minute time limit lapsed. By taking a "pass," the Vikings delayed their choice, but were permitted to then make it at any ensuing time. But in frenzied flury in the minutes immediately following the Minnesota move, Jacksonville, choosing No. 8 overall, rushed in its card to pick quarterback Byron Leftwich. In lightning time after that, Carolina jumped in to choose offensive tackle Jordon Gross. Minnesota finally exercised its pick at the No. 9 slot, selecting defensive tackle Kevin Williams, one of the fastest-rising players in the lottery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "Everyone wanted him to fail so bad". Not really IMO to your post. I could care less about him and I still think at times he may abuse his wife and he has anger issues. She puts up with it because he has millions and they have a kid together. Based on his past I believe he has issues. This here doesn't change my mind about him. They won't have an excuse now when we beat them  . I hope Leonard knocks him silly when he goes over the middle, I would.   You seem to really defend the guy, why I have no idea. You say she is "a piece of you know what". I think he is too and a proven abuser. 
    • True.  But if I remember correctly Bellicheck sent Bledsoe to the Bills and then started Brady.  That was a long time ago of course and I don't remember what they received in return.  I wonder if there are more current examples of a star player being traded within the same division?  
    • If you say so.  It's not evident from your posts And I accepted that.  I'm just saying their previous method was flawed and their new method is flawed as well. But you are equating real life to the game.  Of course in the game a player is going to increase/decrease based on certain items.  For example, if somewhere were to play Madden 2019 through the 2019 season and then start the 2020 season, players ratings would increase/decrease based on the games algorithms.  But that doesn't have anything to do with real life and an actual players ratings. Wow, thanks.  Again, a lot of the Madden ratings leave me scratching my head. But according to you, it's not the same for every player.  You claimed that for oline it was a cumulative based on all their years but with skilled positions since they have more tangible skill sets, their ratings can be based on less information.
    • The NFL did the right thing. There was no evidence of child abuse and the hospital ruled it a accident. Sure maybe he could of got a couple games from the way that tape came off but they did the right thing. It looks like his fiancé is a piece of you know what. Everyone wanted him to fail so bad.  For the kids sake I hope these two go there separate ways so this kid isn’t stuck with them going at it all the time.
    • I personally don't think a QB has to win a SB to be considered great. If having to win a SB is the standard to make a QB great does winning a SB automatically make a QB great. The answer is no unless you consider Jeff Hosteler, Doug Williams, Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson, Joe Flacco great QBs. Those guys don't even belong in the same conversation as Luck and Marino when considering who is the better QB.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...