Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Report (as of 01/28/17): Chris Ballard back for second interview


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 212
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You all should look at KC draft picks the past few years compared to their depth chart, they have built their entire team through the draft, and alot of them are starters. Example in the 6th round of the 2014 draft they selected 2 offensive linemen both of them are starters on their offensive line, Zach Fulton and Laurent Duvernay Tardif. They draft very very well.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, CS5959 said:

You all should look at KC draft picks the past few years compared to their depth chart, they have built their entire team through the draft, and alot of them are starters. Example in the 6th round of the 2014 draft they selected 2 offensive linemen both of them are starters on their offensive line, Zach Fulton and Laurent Duvernay Tardif. They draft very very well.

 

What I really liked about looking at the Chiefs' recent drafts is that they almost always got quality starters with their first 3 picks... I don't know how much of that to attribute to Ballard, but I think that their drafts since 2012 were  better than Seattle's and at least as good as Minnesota's 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Buddy Lee said:

With all these great candidates this year I'm wondering how was Grigs was the choice five years ago. Was he even on the radar screen? I wasn't on this board back then.

Yeah, what was on Grigsons resume that impressed Irsay?

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, NorthernBlue said:

I wonder how much of an effect getting Ballard would mean on perhaps the chances of say, an Eric Berry or Dontari Poe signing in Indy?

 

I know, chances are still gonna be really low regardless, but you gotta think they'd be increased somewhat if they do indeed get Ballard.

 

I doubt he would impact it all.  

 

Now if he, providing he gets the job, were to offer either of them the best contract available, then you might have something.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Imagine had Mathis been healthy coming off of 2013. I seriously doubt the Pats beat us 45-7 had we had Mathis but that is JMO. That game would've been much closer.

Game probably would of been around the same score. Our offense was shut down and the run D would of still been Swiss cheese

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, runthepost said:

Tyrek hill, Travis Kelce...

 

Ballard was hired by the Chiefs after the '13 draft. He didn't have a role in drafting Kelce.

 

So he's been with the Chiefs for 3 drafts. They haven't been able to get lot of talent at skill positions on offensive side (solid picks on oline though) but it's been only 3 drafts. Can't nail picks at every position in such a short time.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Finball said:

 

Ballard was hired by the Chiefs after the '13 draft. He didn't have a role in drafting Kelce.

 

So he's been with the Chiefs for 3 drafts. They haven't been able to get lot of talent at skill positions on offensive side (solid picks on oline though) but it's been only 3 drafts. Can't nail picks at every position in such a short time.

Prolly cause they don't reach for offensive players and just take the best player avaliable even if it's on D. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, jskinnz said:

 

Why would you say that?

 

The Meh was directed at the "reports" and "unnamed sources" . Have we not figured out that 99% of these are false?

 

now if Ballard becomes GM , I'll be happy but until a press conference is called and he is introduced, I'll continue doubting the sources

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, CS5959 said:

You all should look at KC draft picks the past few years compared to their depth chart, they have built their entire team through the draft, and alot of them are starters. Example in the 6th round of the 2014 draft they selected 2 offensive linemen both of them are starters on their offensive line, Zach Fulton and Laurent Duvernay Tardif. They draft very very well.

And they don't reach on project players, although I thought Chris Conley went too high. It also seems like they know how to handle character issue guys. They took Peters in the 1st round because his concerns were an attitude issue when he was on his team. But Tyreek Hill they didn't take until round 6. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, csmopar said:

The Meh was directed at the "reports" and "unnamed sources" . Have we not figured out that 99% of these are false?

 

now if Ballard becomes GM , I'll be happy but until a press conference is called and he is introduced, I'll continue doubting the sources

 

Thanks.  Assumed it was directed toward Ballard as the choice.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, jskinnz said:

 

I doubt he would impact it all.  

 

Now if he, providing he gets the job, were to offer either of them the best contract available, then you might have something.

I agree.  If we get beck to the playoffs, THEN maybe players will take less to play in a successful system.  With Andrew Luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Finball said:

 

Ballard was hired by the Chiefs after the '13 draft. He didn't have a role in drafting Kelce.

 

So he's been with the Chiefs for 3 drafts. They haven't been able to get lot of talent at skill positions on offensive side (solid picks on oline though) but it's been only 3 drafts. Can't nail picks at every position in such a short time.

Look at his bears drafts.

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, JColts72 said:

Look at his bears drafts.

 

If I'm not mistaken, he was mostly just a scout with the Bears (and director of pro scouting at the ned of his tenure), so he wouldn't have had as much say in the drafts as he's had now with the Chiefs.


 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did found this article pretty interesting.

 

Some big hits, some big misses. Really hard to say without more info though. But at least he has eye for the talent

 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-chris-ballard-gm-trivia-20150107-story.html

 

Quote

He was directly involved in many notable Bears acquisitions. The Bears’ offseason moves haven’t been fruitful of late, but Ballard helped bring a host of talent to Chicago during the Angelo era. He assisted on the draft selections of six former Pro Bowlers in Matt Forte, Charles Tillman, Johnny Knox, Nathan Vasher, Tommie Harris and Henry Melton; former Bears scout Greg Gabriel told WSCR-AM (670) on Tuesday that Ballard “literally jumped on the table” for Tillman. Ballard also had a direct hand in bringing Brandon Marshall, Martellus Bennett and Jermon Bushrod to Chicago. Not all of his endorsements have been successful, though: Ballard was a strong proponent of Cedric Benson, who was taken in the 2005 NFL draft ahead of fellow first-round picks Aaron Rodgers, Roddy White, Antrel Rolle and DeMarcus Ware.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Dustin said:

 

I want him to change the coach too. Hopefully not just for the sake of changing coach, but rather with a clear idea and plan about the future of the team.

 

BTW, this might be a stupid question but I'm relatively new to football - how often do teams change their base defensive scheme with new head coach?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's telling here is that ALL these candidates are defensive minds, ALL had a chance to meet with Pagano, who is also a defensive mind, and 3 so far still doesn't want Pagano. That should say it all right there.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Indeee said:

What's telling here is that ALL these candidates are defensive minds, ALL had a chance to meet with Pagano, who is also a defensive mind, and 3 so far still doesn't want Pagano. That should say it all right there.

Like I've said all along, I don't see Pagano being here next year if Irsay hires outside of the org. If Raye gets GM , pagano stays

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Mr Clueless said:

LOL, just think what would happen to this forum if Irsay says no to Ballard's demand and goes for Ray because he kinda likes Chucky. 

 

lmao

If you think about it, it's probably Irsay's "Can't lose" choice (promoting Raye).  He gets to keep his word on Pagano, keeps everyone happy inside the horseshoe, and he can make that choice almost immediately and keep the wheels turning as it relates to draft, FA, etc.  I say this only with these supposed latest developments in mind, as far as GM's wanting new coaching blood.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

 

Ballard is his own man with his own opinions and he has spent the last two seasons working as the director of player personnel for the Chiefs under John Dorsey, whose Packers background includes time working for Ron Wolf and draft-driven Ted Thompson.

 

 

Yes, Ballard was the area scout when the Bears drafted running back Cedric Benson No. 4 overall out of Texas in 2005. Two years later, when it was becoming evident Benson wasn't going to work out, he thought the Bears should move up to draft Oklahoma running back Adrian Peterson if they had a chance.

 

That's a good sign. Ballard has strong enough conviction in what he's doing to admit when he has erred. He's the best salesman in the room with a clear-eyed belief in what he's doing but he also listens well.

 

 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-chris-ballard-biggs-bears-spt-0108-20150107-story.html

 

 

Now this is something I like. No GM bats perfectly, there are going to be misses. But this guys seems to be willing to learn from his mistakes, admit that he's made one and fix it.

 

The whole article is a good read.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Irsay was very serious about Pagano's status for 2017. He said that Pagano is coming back multiple times and it makes sense on some level (Andrew Luck being injured will hurt if we install a new everything with a new head coach). However, now that there are reports saying that GM candidates (especially the top ones) want to switch head coaches, I don't think Irsay is just gonna automatically set aside Pagano (even though it seems we all want him to) for a Cable or a Taub. I think if Irsay looks past Ballard because he wants to make a HC switch he will go the next guy on the list until a guy is there that wants Pagano. Now, if ALL of them, except Raye, obviously want to kick Pagano out then I will believe Irsay would rather have the new GM and a new HC rather than have Raye and Pagano based on recent information. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Pacers are an amazing organization IMO.  They’ve assembled competitive teams for most of the last 25 years with very few high draft picks and not much FA draw to the square city in the middle of a cornfield.   They stink because of injury.  I’m pretty bullish in them assuming a return to the court for all these injured guys.  Are you?
    • The Seahawks allocated about 20% of the cap to the oline, raves about 12,  and 2011 NYG about 15.  That is what this thread is  about, cap economy.
    • In one of the posts I’ve said it’s possible that the Colts are revolutionizing football which happens every so often.  It’s not likely statistically because these type of changes happen once or twice a decade or so.   I said think the rules dictate that the passing game is the most efficient way to score.   One thing that might favor such a revolution, is the fact that since the rules are set up for passing success, teams have adjusted their personnel characteristics,  smaller LBs, nickel base ds.  It’s possible that  emmit smith era emphasis will come back.  I doubt it though.  You still are going to need to throw it into the end zone.
    • I’m not talking about having a great oline.  I’m talking about spending 30 to 40% of your cap in them..  Of course having a great o line is helpful.     The Hoggs aren’t recent.
    • They did Kelly's extension in September, just before the season started.   As for the percentage of the cap, the correct projection is to compare the projected cap hits to the projected salary cap figures. Just because contracts account for X percentage of today's salary cap doesn't mean they'll be the same percentage of the salary cap two or three years from now. 
  • Members

    • jblastick

      jblastick 21

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 705

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheUnshuffler

      TheUnshuffler 29

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tannurr

      tannurr 8

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • uniquicity

      uniquicity 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...