Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Poll: Who do you want to be our next GM?


Who do you want to be the Colts next GM?   

236 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you want to be the Colts next GM?

    • Jimmy Raye III - Colts VP of football operations
      5
    • Trent Kirchner, Seahawks co-director of player personnel
      17
    • Scott Fitterer, Seahawks co-director of player personnel
      10
    • Eric DeCosta, Ravens assistant general manager
      29
    • Eliot Wolf, Packers director of football operations
      23
    • George Paton, Vikings assistant general manager
      22
    • Chris Ballard, Chiefs director of football operations
      130


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, bap1331 said:

Wait, so they not only got smoked by the chiefs with luck but then you bring up the bears where manning smoked them in the Super Bowl? Lol.

Sent from my SM-G935T *

Manning didn't "smoke" anything in that Superbowl, unless it was a Marlboro at halftime.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 220
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

6 hours ago, Superman said:

My preference, in order:

1) Paton (the Vikings have drafted a lot of my favorite prospects)

2) Ballard (can't argue with that defense, and maybe he brings Eric Berry?)

3) Kirchner (has more experience than Fitterer)

4) Fitterer (still a good candidate with good background)

5) Wolf (YOUNG)

6) Raye (least attractive option, would probably be at the bottom of the list if there were 30 candidates)

 

This is not a bad list, at all, by the way. My only gripe is that DeCosta isn't on it. Not excited by Raye, but more willing to give him a chance than most.

 

Hey! That's My list- except flip flop #1 and #2 !!

 

1) Ballard     

2) Paton        

3) Kirchner  

4) Fitterer    

5) Wolf          

6) Raye       

 

DeCosta would be my #1, but I had a feeling he'd decline once again.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Superman said:

 

Good idea with the chart, but...

 

Bridgewater, Waynes, Hunter, Clemmings and Treadwell should all be projected starters, IMO. I get Bridgewater being held back due to injury, but the others are anticipated to be part of the Vikings core.

 

I think you can include Gerald Hodges as a starter. Wasn't he a starting LB for the 49ers this past season? 

 

I get the sense that Paton is going to the 49ers. What do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

I think you can include Gerald Hodges as a starter. Wasn't he a starting LB for the 49ers this past season? 

 

I get the sense that Paton is going to the 49ers. What do you think?

 

I felt that way until he accepted an interview with the Colts. He might be leveraging his position with the Niners, but if they've communicated anything to him, I would think he'd just sit tight until they make their decisions final. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

I think you can include Gerald Hodges as a starter. Wasn't he a starting LB for the 49ers this past season? 

 

I get the sense that Paton is going to the 49ers. What do you think?

If Paton has his choice it won't be to the 49ers

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, mahagga73 said:

Seems lateral to me. They haven't been much more successful than us since Grigano came around. With a better roster. Not just 2 games. I just prefer the guy coming in to have a ring that's all. 

 

How many former patriot coaches and front office personnel who had SB rings went on to other teams only to fail in a comedic way?

 

Let me answer that...so many that it's actually become a legitimate stigma on all future patriot coaches and FO men.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Zach Boyd said:

If Paton has his choice it won't be to the 49ers

 

 

You may be right, but he is from California and he'll probably be working with the hottest young coach in Shanahan.  Those are pros on the side of the 49ers. But the Colts have Andrew, which makes this situation better. 

 

I don't have a vote but if I did, I would vote anyone but Paton. :P

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's tough, I don't know any of these guys.  Nor do I feel qualified to examine their worth as GM's.  But if I'm going by just "buzz" that I read from respected guys around the NFL, DeCosta, who is out now, or Ballard seem the most viable, with Wolf maybe coming in third on that list, although he just re-upped with GB.  But the reality is we all won't really know about this hire until a good 2-3 years into it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't onow enough about any of them really to make an educated choice.  i do like hearing it is basically a "who's who" of candidates.

hearing these guys are very excited about the job is great as well.

the timing might be good too as only the 49Ers are looking.

 I will give credit to Jim as it sounds like he is taking all the steps necessary.

 Jim might make quick, rash decisions buying guitars and drum kits, but when it comes to the Colts, he's much more calculating thankfully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a very good list... I know that San Fran really wanted Ballard. 

 

I chose Ballard as well, because he is known to be "connected" per multiple reports. He should be able to assemble a scouting team quickly with well respected guys from around the league. 

 

I'm not as down on Chuck as most fans, but I have to assume that, if 2017 HC is a sticking point in negotiations, Irsay will acquiesce on that.

 

 It isn't easy to evaluate first-time GM candidates at all, especially for fans. Most of what I've read would indicate that it's a perfect time for Irsay to make a change, though... There are a number of very strong candidates and no real competition for them. Next year, most of the guys on our short list will probably be given GM jobs somewhere else in the league. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not just saying this because I am a Colts fan but if it came down to me taking a GM job with Indy or SF, I would choose Indy all day and yesterday. SF is a dumpster fire of a franchise with lousy QB's. With Andrew Luck, just give him a Good Defense and you are the GM that wins 11 games every season automatically.

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Superman said:

My preference, in order:

1) Paton (the Vikings have drafted a lot of my favorite prospects)

2) Ballard (can't argue with that defense, and maybe he brings Eric Berry?)

3) Kirchner (has more experience than Fitterer)

4) Fitterer (still a good candidate with good background)

5) Wolf (YOUNG)

6) Raye (least attractive option, would probably be at the bottom of the list if there were 30 candidates)

 

This is not a bad list, at all, by the way. My only gripe is that DeCosta isn't on it. Not excited by Raye, but more willing to give him a chance than most.

 

I like this list, I could flip Ballard and Patton depending on my mood.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, bap1331 said:

 

because coaches dont win unless they have the talent around them?http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/787/356/d6f.jpg

7 people liked my post that you quoted and disagree with. Nobody will like your post, because it lacks common sense.  What a dumb argument. 

Just because there's talent, doesn't mean the coach will take that team to the superbowl. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Majin Vegeta said:

7 people liked my post that you quoted and disagree with. Nobody will like your post, because it lacks common sense.  What a dumb argument. 

Just because there's talent, doesn't mean the coach will take that team to the superbowl. 

Well said. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a fan of Ballard and Paton. Both have contributed to great personnel moves in their respected organizations. But I'm surprised Elliot wolf is only at 10%!?! I mean talk about a young prodigy, son of a hall of famer to the same craft, he's breed for this. Of course he probably could wait it out in green bay and get there GM job but who knows how long that'll take. If he's chompping at the bit, ready to take control of his own franchise I welcome him with open arms. With these 3 plus the Seattle squad, I pray we dont go with jimmy raye III. I know Ryan had the final say in everything, doesn't mean jimmy Raye wasn't consulting with him. Sure I bet they disagreed sometimes and Ryan might have just ignored some of Jimmy's opinions, but I really doubt that the exec of football operations doesn't have a single finger print on this laughing stock of a roster. I really don't even care what his resume looks like be4 indi, becuz since he's been here he hasn't done a thing to help this team succeed. 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Tmoney said:

I'm a fan of Ballard and Paton. Both have contributed to great personnel moves in their respected organizations. But I'm surprised Elliot wolf is only at 10%!?! I mean talk about a young prodigy, son of a hall of famer to the same craft, he's breed for this. Of course he probably could wait it out in green bay and get there GM job but who knows how long that'll take. If he's chompping at the bit, ready to take control of his own franchise I welcome him with open arms. With these 3 plus the Seattle squad, I pray we dont go with jimmy raye III. I know Ryan had the final say in everything, doesn't mean jimmy Raye wasn't consulting with him. Sure I bet they disagreed sometimes and Ryan might have just ignored some of Jimmy's opinions, but I really doubt that the exec of football operations doesn't have a single finger print on this laughing stock of a roster. I really don't even care what his resume looks like be4 indi, becuz since he's been here he hasn't done a thing to help this team succeed. 

 

 

 

 

I think the main issue people have with Elliot is his age. Some fans also might be scared away by the idea of a son-prodigy type GM after what happened with Chris Polian.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Restored said:

 

I think the main issue people have with Elliot is his age. Some fans also might be scared away by the idea of a son-prodigy type GM after what happened with Chris Polian.

I would also be concerned because of the ego that can come with that and seeing how poorly an egomaniac like Grigson worked with others. I would also like someone with a longer period of experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted Ballard and stick with that vote based upon what I've read.  It's an impressive list of candidates and as someone mentioned, they have agreed to be interviewed and apparently not put off that Pagano will be the HC in 2017.

 

But, if Paton gets the job, just imagine some of the marketing opportunities...Colts GM "General" George Paton!!  Remember the last time Indiana had a General?  Just having a little fun after I saw the names and instantly this image came to mind.

 

 

300px-Patton.jpg

c553f0d1a46d6771de7a71e46cfb9084.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Majin Vegeta said:

7 people liked my post that you quoted and disagree with. Nobody will like your post, because it lacks common sense.  What a dumb argument. 

Just because there's talent, doesn't mean the coach will take that team to the superbowl. 

 

all I can say is...don't bother. :rock:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is the thing, you can't always look at position value because there are outliers like Nelson. Of course DE is more valuable than OG but if there is an outlier like a Larry Allen or Nelson it isn't. At the time we selected Nelson we needed a major upgrade to the O.Line and to protect Luck. Had we picked 3rd, I still would've took Nelson. I just seen him as being great, one of those outliers coming out of the draft.
    • Alarming?    When the time comes, you don’t think Pittman is going to get a big contract?   You don’t think Taylor is going to get a big contract?   The answers are right in front of you, and for some odd reason, you’re not seeing it.  
    • The Colts have the cap space to sign Leonard and Smith to long-term deals this year and Nelson fortunately for us we are able to extend his 5th-year rookie contract option and post-pone his big payday a year later.   Leonard is not a true MLB so I doubt he will reset the market value at the linebacker position.  Originally thought Leonard could get a 5 year/$100 million contract with $60 million guaranteed but think it will be closer to 5 years/$82.5 million with $40 million guaranteed.   Smith am guessing closer to a 4 year/$58 million contract with $30 million guaranteed.   Depending on whom we keep/sign at left tackle I think will set the stage of how much cap space we will have left to resign players.  Do we keep an older Fisher or try to go after Viking's O'Neill (RT) and move him back to his LT position he played in college.  Both will cost a lot to retain either way and have some flexibility with O'Neill and Smith combination.   Do think Glowinski will be a cap causality since he is already on the books for $7.5 million for 2021 and expect him to make over $8 million in 2022.   The only other pending FA of note after this season to play RG Brandon Scherff but expect him to be too high priced out of the Colt range (4yr/$66 million).  So looks like OL Chris Reed might be a future option or another current OL on the roster might be able to take over.    As for the draft will have to keep in mind RG Baer Hunter from Appalachian State.  Hunter's team's OL ranked as a top-15 unit nationally that was very good at running the football.  Biggest issue have seen about Hunter from his game tapes is his a  drive killer with potential penalties with unnecessary holding and block in the backs once the play has extended past the second level.  The young man I do like best at this point in time is RG Cain Madden from Marshall.  Madden's run-blocking abilities improved form 60.3 to 74.2 from 2019/2020 and he finished top 10 among RGs.   Wouldn't be surprised next off-season if we cut IDL Grover Stewart – save 8.125m or 9.378m June 1 Cut and TE Jack Doyle – save 5.45m.  Some of the other FA's doubt we resign are Stallworth, Rochell, Muhammad, Carrie, Mack, Eldrenkamp, Dulin and Campbell.   After we resign Leonard and Smith to big contract extensions can see the Colts resign, MAC, Pascal, Lewis, Turray,Holden, Hunt and Reed.  Hines should also get resigned and looking at something similar to Austin Eckler contract APY $4.55 million 3 year/$13.645 million (base 3.9 million, 4.5 million, 5.65 million with 1.35 million roster bonus each year).  One FA name I like to replace Stewart with a younger improved version is Bear's IDL Bilal Nichols at best am comparing him to IDL Dalvin Tomlinson where I would offer him a 3 year/$33 million $11 million APY with $20 million signing bonus.  Again we get back either $8.125 million or $9.378 million depending on when we release Stewart under this scenario which after these movements only leaves the Colts with a projected $7-8 million in cap space currently.   Will have to do more research and play around with the futures but can envision the Colts will need to find starting WR, RG, RCB with backups at RDT, RDE, RB, FS, SS,  and TE.   Early watch list RD 1 Draft picks 2022 TE Jalen Wydermyer, Texas A&M George Pickens, WR, Georgia Drake Jackson, Edge, USC Ahmad Gardner, CB, Cincinnati Derek Stingley JR, CB, LSU Kaiir Elam, CB, Florida   RD 2 picks Myjai Sanders, EDGE, Cincinnati Kolby Harvell-Peel, S, Oklahoma State Justyn Ross, WR, Clemson John Metchie III, WR, Alabama Aidan Hutchinson, IDL, Michigan          
    • If what Ballard says about a Achilles is what happens with Fisher that means he could be ready by TC. Mack looks like he might be close to 100% and he is at the 8th mark. I think they will be extra careful with Dayo. But Fisher is a vet so if he is ready he will go.  Very possible Fisher is ready week one.
    • Those shoulder pads make him look huge. Lol
  • Members

    • Shyne7

      Shyne7 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Gigc

      Gigc 273

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Virtuoso80

      Virtuoso80 227

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 9,843

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • shasta519

      shasta519 3,090

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Larry Horseman

      Larry Horseman 18

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 22,689

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 7,266

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 9,266

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BillHill

      BillHill 6

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...