Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Luck is Good

NFC Championship: Packers at Falcons Game Thread

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

   The first thing to see is: How much of a factor will Jordy Nelson be...

I think he'll surprise some people today. This is one tough player. A very good player

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love how the players have to stand on the field 5 minutes before the kickoff while the 2 sideline talking heads give us almost meaningless information

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

Some of the Falcons offensive numbers have to do with the fact that they played the Saints twice

They put up big numbers on almost every defense they played

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jvan1973 said:

They put up big numbers on almost every defense they played

But the saints have little 'D' and play shootout style most teams don't play them twice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, oldunclemark said:

But the saints have little 'D' and play shootout style most teams don't play them twice

Take the saints stats out,  and they still have the best offense in the league

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, I wish would could steal Shanahan from SF. I know it's unlikely though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jvan1973 said:

Take the saints stats out,  and they still have the best offense in the league

But their stats, as I said, are inflated by the NOLA games....I'm not taking them louit

 

Just saying those are always shootout numbers that GB or Dallas, for example, don't get

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, snkdy said:

Man, I wish would could steal Shanahan from SF. I know it's unlikely though.

you think we could run that offense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, oldunclemark said:

you think we could run that offense

 

They have more (and better) weapons than we do, but I would love to see Shanahan work with Luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its got to be a great feeling to lose the toss...get a mediocre return and then drive the length of the field in a title game

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, snkdy said:

 

They have more (and better) weapons than we do, but I would love to see Shanahan work with Luck.

I think we could, actually...They have speedy RBs we don't have  but we have the receivers and TEs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, snkdy said:

 

They have more (and better) weapons than we do, but I would love to see Shanahan work with Luck.

If we had a lightning fast RB, like a Sproles type we could be dangerous. Falcons have speed at every position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

If we had a lightning fast RB, like a Sproles type we could be dangerous. Falcons have speed at every position.

we arent slow at WR are we?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

If we had a lightning fast RB, like a Sproles type we could be dangerous. Falcons have speed at every position.

 

Hoping we address that in the draft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

No but our Rbacks are

Agreed. A guy playing in this game is what I would want in a RB. Tevin Coleman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

No but our Rbacks are

You mean,. Frank Gore is, right?  He cant help it if he's old

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I didn’t say you did.  I said they were.   Marvin is fifth in career catches and Wayne is 10th.  Bruce is 13th and Holt doesn’t make the top 13.   Holt is 16th in career yards and 36th in TDs.     So Harrison tops Bruce in catches and TDs while Bruce has the edge in yards.  I think TDs and catches are much more important than yards. Wayne tops Holt in everything and tops Bruce in catches.     As a duo give me Harrison and Wayne.   Moss and Carter is another good duo although it was short lived and the Steelers had Stallworth and Swann.  Those are the best sets I can come up with.     The Steelers have been good at producing stud WRs as a franchise but I am not sure I would take them over Harrison and Berry who are probably two of the top 10 WRs to ever play the game and Wayne who is also probably going to end up a Hall of Famer.  
    • Where did I say they were?  Harrison and Wayne were 9th and 10th in career yards while Bruce was 5th. Harrison was 5th in TDs while Wayne was 24th. Bruce was 12th.  So it's debatable.   
    • Wayne and Harrison were just as good.
    • The St. Louis Rams had a couple of great WRs with Holt 1999-2008 and Bruce 1994-2007. Kind of hard to beat those two at the same time. Add Faulk 1999-2005 as he was maybe the best RB receiver in history. 
    • I love what Ballard has done with the roster, but honestly could care less about rankings.  Give me Ws...   Sorry man, couldn't help myself!  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...