Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ColtsStrong86

GM Candidates, including Jimmy Raye (merge)

Recommended Posts

People go on and on about head coaching experience.  I posted a list a while back of Super Bowl winning head coaches.  The vast majority, over 2/3, had no previous experience and won their first Super Bowl within 5 years with their team - most within 2-3 years, just as Belichick did and Quinn now has a chance to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who’s the G.M. favorite in Indy?

Mike Florio is now saying that, despite all the reports of the Colts focusing on prospects from outside the organization, the choice will probably be Jimmy Raye.

And he goes on to say, basically, how Raye would be easier to fire, if the team stinks again next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

Who’s the G.M. favorite in Indy?

Mike Florio is now saying that, despite all the reports of the Colts focusing on prospects from outside the organization, the choice will probably be Jimmy Raye.

And it he goes on to say, basically, how Raye would be easier to fire, if the team stinks again next year. 

It's the same thing he said four days ago.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

Who’s the G.M. favorite in Indy?

Mike Florio is now saying that, despite all the reports of the Colts focusing on prospects from outside the organization, the choice will probably be Jimmy Raye.

And he goes on to say, basically, how Raye would be easier to fire, if the team stinks again next year.

I don't think that piece makes much sense. Go for a certain candidate because he is easier to fire? That is just a silly idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

Who’s the G.M. favorite in Indy?

Mike Florio is now saying that, despite all the reports of the Colts focusing on prospects from outside the organization, the choice will probably be Jimmy Raye.

And he goes on to say, basically, how Raye would be easier to fire, if the team stinks again next year.


I hope he's just speculating because of the new info that Pagano has talked with candidates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

Who’s the G.M. favorite in Indy?

Mike Florio is now saying that, despite all the reports of the Colts focusing on prospects from outside the organization, the choice will probably be Jimmy Raye.

And he goes on to say, basically, how Raye would be easier to fire, if the team stinks again next year.

 

Not only does Florio not have a good batting average for predictions,  but this one is incredibly poor.     

 

He fires Grigson,  does a 6-man search with the top names for the new GM.    Passes on the 5 outsiders to promote Jimmy Raye.     But then, if the team does poorly next year,  (which would be on Grigson/Pagano)  Irsay would use that as an excuse to also fire Raye after one year.

 

That's among the lamest bit of analysis and forecasting I've ever read.

 

I'd be embarrassed to write that with my name attached.

 

Wait until Superman reads this!!         :peek:                  :facepalm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

Who’s the G.M. favorite in Indy?

...Promoting Raye also makes it easier to put G.M. and coach on equal footing for accountability purposes, with both being told that either they succeed together or fail together. It would be difficult to tell a new G.M. from the outside that he’s fused at the hip with Pagano.

So if it doesn’t work between Raye and Pagano, that would be the occasion to press the reset button, hire someone from the outside, and hire a new coach.

 

Here we go again with the stupid "fused at the hip" analogy.

How did that work out the last time with Grigson and Pagano??

And now they figure Irsay wants Grigson's replacement to be "fused at the hip" with Chuck?

 

Good Grief!

 

If Irsay does pick Raye. 

I hope it is not because Irsay wants to try Raye and Pagano for one season (and assuming the team continues to struggle)  

Then fire them both and start this whole process over again next year?

What an asinine approach that would be.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are hiring somebody with the thought in mind that you could easily fire them, then you do not believe in that person. Florio is an embarrassment. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Colts have been pretty open with their information.  Now that we know they are bringing in certain candidates for a 2nd interview, and we find out one of them is Raye, that will enlighten us a bit.  How could he say no to a 2nd interview with one of his own?  I would think, Raye, Paton, Ballard for round 2.  hard to say no to Wolf, but at 34, probably needs to cut his teeth a bit more.... did you hear he's been helping with the draft since the age of 11 ?  Wow!!!  maybe he's cut those NFL scouting teeth a long time ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, chrisfarley said:

The Colts have been pretty open with their information.  Now that we know they are bringing in certain candidates for a 2nd interview, and we find out one of them is Raye, that will enlighten us a bit.  How could he say no to a 2nd interview with one of his own?  I would think, Raye, Paton, Ballard for round 2. Professor John Clayton says Raye, Wolf & Ballard.  hard to say no to Wolf, but at 34, probably needs to cut his teeth a bit more.... did you hear he's been helping with the draft since the age of 11 ?  Wow!!!  maybe he's cut those NFL scouting teeth a long time ago. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Derakynn said:

If you are hiring somebody with the thought in mind that you could easily fire them, then you do not believe in that person. Florio is an embarrassment. 

Irsay is on record saying that he values stability and continuity. This hire Raye because he would be easier to fire is the opposite. I don't believe it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, grmasterb said:

May I introduce you to John Harbaugh?

 

Heres the problem though...name another example.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, coltsblue1844 said:

 

Marv Levy, Dick Vermeil, Mike Ditka, Bill Cowher, Bill Belichick and John HHarbaugh

 

Aside from harbaugh, did any of the others jump straight from ST to HC?  THATS the difference

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Irsay is playing around here.  That said, it could just as easily be Raye as anyone else. Getting interesting for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Jason_S said:

 

Aside from harbaugh, did any of the others jump straight from ST to HC?  THATS the difference

 

Harbaugh didn't do that either.

 

from wiki

 

Quote

In 2007, after serving as Eagles' special-teams coach for nine years, he became their defensive-backs coach. This fulfilled his request to head coach Reid and improved his chances of landing a head coaching job, since executives at that time viewed special teams coaches as unqualified to move up to head coach.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Harbaugh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't really have a problem with Raye to begin with, and still don't think he would necessarily be a bad choice.  But, after seeing the other potential GMs and reading up on them I have to admit I think I would feel kinda "blah"/let down if Raye ended up as GM. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would assume Paton would want an answer from the Colts fairly quickly with things moving along in SanFran. (ARTICLE: Nick Wagoner 01/27)

I bolded the more salient & relevant items below that pertain to the way they are conducting their search and items pertaining to Paton.

 

SANTA CLARA, Calif. -- Atlanta Falcons offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan hasn't been allowed to speak to the San Francisco 49ers since the parties first met on Jan. 6.

The Niners can't hire Shanahan as their next head coach -- the expected outcome from this extended search -- until after the Super Bowl. But the Niners can have contact with Shanahan again before he sits at the controls of Atlanta's offense in the Super Bowl.

While his focus remains on the Falcons' offense and the Super Bowl, Kyle Shanahan also has his eye on the 49ers and their search for a coach and a general manager. Curtis Compton/Atlanta Journal-Constitution via AP

That contact is set to happen this weekend, as the Niners and Shanahan have scheduled a second interview session. Shanahan has spent this week preparing a game plan for the New England Patriots but now has a window of Friday afternoon through Saturday in which he is eligible to meet with the 49ers.

“It’s worked out pretty good because getting this bye week before the Super Bowl, we have two weeks to prepare for it," Shanahan said Thursday. "We all get the day off on Saturday before we travel on Sunday. So on Saturday, I’m going to do what I did a couple of Saturdays ago and interviewed for the first time. So I’ll get a chance to talk with them again, and we’ll see how it goes.’’

Of course, these meetings will take on a much different tone and look from the initial interview. The Niners honed in on Shanahan as their primary target almost two weeks ago, which means there's little need for trying to determine if Shanahan is the right guy for the job.

Instead, this second meeting will be more focused on what the Niners can do to put Shanahan in the best position to succeed. Niners CEO Jed York said at the outset of this process that he didn't care if he hired a general manager or a coach first, so long as the duo had a good rapport and could work together.

“I think we need to be open and flexible to structure," York said. "We need to make sure that the head coach and the general manager know each other, have a good understanding for each other. Doesn’t mean that they had to have worked together in the past, but they have to have a good respect for each other and a good understanding and know that they have similar visions and philosophies on building a football team.

"And whatever structure is the best with the people that we’re interviewing is the structure that we’re going to go with.”

Half of that equation is presumably complete as the Niners await the chance to formally hire Shanahan. But this weekend's meetings will be largely devoted to finishing the puzzle. In addition to meeting with Shanahan, the Niners are also set to meet with their two remaining general manager candidates, Minnesota Vikings assistant general manager George Paton and Arizona Cardinals vice president of player personnel Terry McDonough.

Paton and McDonough are the only candidates left from the team's initial pool for the general manager job, and both will be in their second meeting with the Niners. This time, though, it's expected that Shanahan will participate in those meetings, which are scheduled to take place in Atlanta. Involving Shanahan would allow the Niners the chance to see how he interacts with Paton and McDonough and help them compare and contrast philosophies for building a team.

With no restrictions on when they can hire a general manager, it's possible the 49ers could choose one of the candidates and hire him before Shanahan would be eligible to be hired officially. That will likely depend on who hits it off with Shanahan.

Speaking to the MMQB podcast this week, Shanahan didn't sound fazed by the fact that the 49ers are looking to hire a coach again after firing each of their past two head coaches after just one season.

“You got to look into every situation for what they have, what they’re saying,” Shanahan said. “I got to talk to them a couple of weeks ago. I’ll be allowed to talk to them again this week. We’ll see what their plans are -- don’t really know yet. But that’s definitely something that’s enticing, and you hope to have an opportunity because everything takes time.

“I’ve believed it for a while. You always want the right opportunity. But I’ve been battle-tested. I think I went through a lot of situations that a lot of coordinators in the league haven’t. I think I’ve had to handle some situations or got some attention, mostly negative, that usually head coaches only have to deal with. So I think that’s helped me prepare from that standpoint.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

GEORGE PATON MAY NOT ACCEPT POTENTIAL OFFER

SUNDAY, JANUARY 29, 2017 10:24 AM EST
Minnesota Vikings assistant general manager George Paton is not a lock to accept the San Francisco 49ers' general manager job if he is offered the position, according to multiple league sources.

 

I'd be just as happy with Paton.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/28/2017 at 9:41 AM, #12. said:

just as Belichick did

 

I'm sorry, what?

 

Belichick was the Browns head coach for five years, and only made the playoffs once. He doesn't belong on your list.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/28/2017 at 9:50 AM, NewColtsFan said:

 

Not only does Florio not have a good batting average for predictions,  but this one is incredibly poor.     

 

He fires Grigson,  does a 6-man search with the top names for the new GM.    Passes on the 5 outsiders to promote Jimmy Raye.     But then, if the team does poorly next year,  (which would be on Grigson/Pagano)  Irsay would use that as an excuse to also fire Raye after one year.

 

That's among the lamest bit of analysis and forecasting I've ever read.

 

I'd be embarrassed to write that with my name attached.

 

Wait until Superman reads this!!         :peek:                  :facepalm:

 

This is why I typically don't read Florio.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎1‎/‎28‎/‎2017 at 9:50 AM, NewColtsFan said:

 

Not only does Florio not have a good batting average for predictions,  but this one is incredibly poor.     

 

He fires Grigson,  does a 6-man search with the top names for the new GM.    Passes on the 5 outsiders to promote Jimmy Raye.     But then, if the team does poorly next year,  (which would be on Grigson/Pagano)  Irsay would use that as an excuse to also fire Raye after one year.

 

That's among the lamest bit of analysis and forecasting I've ever read.

 

I'd be embarrassed to write that with my name attached.

 

Wait until Superman reads this!!         :peek:                  :facepalm:

That guy is a huge Colts hater. What a turd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Remember,  we are not debating whether Spring is doable.   I've stated from the beginning that I agree.    It's not as bad as some here think it is.    It's doable,   No question.   We are debating whether Spring is preferable, or desireable.    So, when you write,  that you don't think you have to say more about an issue,  any issue,  I'm sorry,   but NO!     You DO have to say more.  A heckuva lot more.    Because YOU have the burden of proof.    My position is the Industry Standard.   Your's has, by comparison,  a handful of examples.   Some are recent.   That's great.   But I view that as a nod to the position that it's doable.    You view it as a possibility that it might soon become the norm.   I'm happy to wait until that actually happens.   As to your primary argument.....    that all the prep work has been done,  and if you make the changes in winter,  that the GM is not up to speed on what the current scouts and player personnel people have done.    Except there is this......   Your argument that you yourself use to others here who complain that changing in the spring is bad.   To quote you....   it's just one draft.    One free agency period.    And there will soon be another,  and then another....   and another.   One season is nothing in the grand scheme of things.   That is what you wrote (roughly) to posters who think making the GM change in the spring is outright terrible and stupid.    Which I strongly disagree with their positin.   Your argument makes my argument for me.    I want the new GM in the building ASAP.    So he can sooner evaluate his players.    His front office.    His scouts.    The entire program.   Waiting until May or June just delays that.    I want it to begin ASAP.   I'd expect that he can and would be able to make some level of difference in his first free agency and draft.    Plus,  I think you way, way over-dramatize the handicap the new GM has arriving in January.   He's the GM.    He's already got a ton of information in his head,  and in his notebooks, his binders.    He's not in as much of a bind as you like to portray.     So, with your desired scenario, this draft could be used for a system that the new GM doesn't even want to run.    Like Chuck running a 3-4,  when Ballard wants to run a 4-3.    Like Chuck wanted to run a power running game and a deep pattern passing game.    While Ballard favors a zone running game and a get rid of the ball quick, move the chains offense.     In your preferred scenario,  you're the one who is burning the first year the GM has,  not me.     I see little of the benefits and mostly an approach that screams....   "Gee,  I hope this works out."   By the way,  I didn't want this post to end without addressing one of your main points.   Your paragraph that starts with this:   My Point:  There are always good candidates...   same is true for head coaches and coordinators.    I'm sorry,  but I'm going to STRONGLY disagree with that argument.  And I think you'll retract that.    Every so often you'll see an article about how did the class of GM's from a previous year turn out?   Or head coach hires?    I used to tell posters here who hated Pagano that the class of head coaches that included Chuck,  that all of the other coaches got fired before Chuck.    That Chuck was the best of his class.   And that happens with GM's too.   A class gets hired,  and quite often most of them, sometimes all of them don't work out.   I believe my position has far more facts to back that up.    There isn't always a Sean McVey.  There isn't always a Kyle Shannahan.   There isn't always a Josh McDaniels.   There aren't 32 good GM's, or 32 good head coaches,  or 32 good offensive or defensive coordinators.   That's why so many teams struggle for years to get those spots right.   So, no, I absolutely reject the idea that there are always good candidates.    Sorry.   I know you believe what you're writing.   But honestly, this feels like one big thought experiment. Like you're trying to make a case for something you really don't believe,  but you're trying to see if you can make a good argument anyway.   And yet I know that's NOT the case.    That you really, honestly do believe this.    That's what I find so astonishing.    There's lots of opinion,  and not a lot of evidence to back this up.    As I've said from the get-go....   I think this is doable.    I just don't think it's desireable or preferable.  
    • To your last paragraph....   yes,  I agree that if a GM,  any GM, inherits a bad roster,  then no matter how OK his draft picks may be,   they will likely stick on the roster.   But if you're a GM inheriting a poor team,  and you draft players that are only somewhat better than what you originally had,  then the improvement in the team will only be so good.   Again,  from 4 wis,  to perhaps 6-7.    That wouldn't be bad.    That would be reasonable.   But when you suddenly pop to 10 wins,  including 9 of the last 10 in the regular season,  and you win on the road in the playoffs,   then there's got to be something more there than just the GM's new guys.    Those guys have got to be good.    You can't do that well simply because they're better than the previous guys.    They're much better.    Yes, the coaching staff is better and the systems the team is running are better,  but so are the players.    They have to execute.    And we did.   Better than we thought possible.    Certainly better than when we were 1-5 and looked like a candidate for a top-10 or even a top-5 draft pick.    The players are good.   They may not be great yet,  but they're really good and much better than what we had.    The results are all the proof you need.   Again,  thanks for the exchange....  
    • I missed the first couple innings, was keeping track on phone, didn’t realize things got chippy with the benches clearing after the Contreras HR! Seems the Cubs were playing with a little extra edge tonight, I love it!!! 
    • and then NE goes into KC and throws for 350 and Sony runs for 100+ on them. our O, and O game plan just sucked.   i get KC was good, but our O just sucked.
  • Members

    • Nate!

      Nate! 44

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,321

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Franklin County

      Franklin County 452

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 7,668

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 9,354

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DaveA1102

      DaveA1102 1,864

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...