Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ColtsStrong86

GM Candidates, including Jimmy Raye (merge)

Recommended Posts

People go on and on about head coaching experience.  I posted a list a while back of Super Bowl winning head coaches.  The vast majority, over 2/3, had no previous experience and won their first Super Bowl within 5 years with their team - most within 2-3 years, just as Belichick did and Quinn now has a chance to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who’s the G.M. favorite in Indy?

Mike Florio is now saying that, despite all the reports of the Colts focusing on prospects from outside the organization, the choice will probably be Jimmy Raye.

And he goes on to say, basically, how Raye would be easier to fire, if the team stinks again next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

Who’s the G.M. favorite in Indy?

Mike Florio is now saying that, despite all the reports of the Colts focusing on prospects from outside the organization, the choice will probably be Jimmy Raye.

And it he goes on to say, basically, how Raye would be easier to fire, if the team stinks again next year. 

It's the same thing he said four days ago.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

Who’s the G.M. favorite in Indy?

Mike Florio is now saying that, despite all the reports of the Colts focusing on prospects from outside the organization, the choice will probably be Jimmy Raye.

And he goes on to say, basically, how Raye would be easier to fire, if the team stinks again next year.

I don't think that piece makes much sense. Go for a certain candidate because he is easier to fire? That is just a silly idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

Who’s the G.M. favorite in Indy?

Mike Florio is now saying that, despite all the reports of the Colts focusing on prospects from outside the organization, the choice will probably be Jimmy Raye.

And he goes on to say, basically, how Raye would be easier to fire, if the team stinks again next year.


I hope he's just speculating because of the new info that Pagano has talked with candidates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

Who’s the G.M. favorite in Indy?

Mike Florio is now saying that, despite all the reports of the Colts focusing on prospects from outside the organization, the choice will probably be Jimmy Raye.

And he goes on to say, basically, how Raye would be easier to fire, if the team stinks again next year.

 

Not only does Florio not have a good batting average for predictions,  but this one is incredibly poor.     

 

He fires Grigson,  does a 6-man search with the top names for the new GM.    Passes on the 5 outsiders to promote Jimmy Raye.     But then, if the team does poorly next year,  (which would be on Grigson/Pagano)  Irsay would use that as an excuse to also fire Raye after one year.

 

That's among the lamest bit of analysis and forecasting I've ever read.

 

I'd be embarrassed to write that with my name attached.

 

Wait until Superman reads this!!         :peek:                  :facepalm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

Who’s the G.M. favorite in Indy?

...Promoting Raye also makes it easier to put G.M. and coach on equal footing for accountability purposes, with both being told that either they succeed together or fail together. It would be difficult to tell a new G.M. from the outside that he’s fused at the hip with Pagano.

So if it doesn’t work between Raye and Pagano, that would be the occasion to press the reset button, hire someone from the outside, and hire a new coach.

 

Here we go again with the stupid "fused at the hip" analogy.

How did that work out the last time with Grigson and Pagano??

And now they figure Irsay wants Grigson's replacement to be "fused at the hip" with Chuck?

 

Good Grief!

 

If Irsay does pick Raye. 

I hope it is not because Irsay wants to try Raye and Pagano for one season (and assuming the team continues to struggle)  

Then fire them both and start this whole process over again next year?

What an asinine approach that would be.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are hiring somebody with the thought in mind that you could easily fire them, then you do not believe in that person. Florio is an embarrassment. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Colts have been pretty open with their information.  Now that we know they are bringing in certain candidates for a 2nd interview, and we find out one of them is Raye, that will enlighten us a bit.  How could he say no to a 2nd interview with one of his own?  I would think, Raye, Paton, Ballard for round 2.  hard to say no to Wolf, but at 34, probably needs to cut his teeth a bit more.... did you hear he's been helping with the draft since the age of 11 ?  Wow!!!  maybe he's cut those NFL scouting teeth a long time ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, chrisfarley said:

The Colts have been pretty open with their information.  Now that we know they are bringing in certain candidates for a 2nd interview, and we find out one of them is Raye, that will enlighten us a bit.  How could he say no to a 2nd interview with one of his own?  I would think, Raye, Paton, Ballard for round 2. Professor John Clayton says Raye, Wolf & Ballard.  hard to say no to Wolf, but at 34, probably needs to cut his teeth a bit more.... did you hear he's been helping with the draft since the age of 11 ?  Wow!!!  maybe he's cut those NFL scouting teeth a long time ago. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Derakynn said:

If you are hiring somebody with the thought in mind that you could easily fire them, then you do not believe in that person. Florio is an embarrassment. 

Irsay is on record saying that he values stability and continuity. This hire Raye because he would be easier to fire is the opposite. I don't believe it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, grmasterb said:

May I introduce you to John Harbaugh?

 

Heres the problem though...name another example.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, coltsblue1844 said:

 

Marv Levy, Dick Vermeil, Mike Ditka, Bill Cowher, Bill Belichick and John HHarbaugh

 

Aside from harbaugh, did any of the others jump straight from ST to HC?  THATS the difference

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Irsay is playing around here.  That said, it could just as easily be Raye as anyone else. Getting interesting for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Jason_S said:

 

Aside from harbaugh, did any of the others jump straight from ST to HC?  THATS the difference

 

Harbaugh didn't do that either.

 

from wiki

 

Quote

In 2007, after serving as Eagles' special-teams coach for nine years, he became their defensive-backs coach. This fulfilled his request to head coach Reid and improved his chances of landing a head coaching job, since executives at that time viewed special teams coaches as unqualified to move up to head coach.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Harbaugh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't really have a problem with Raye to begin with, and still don't think he would necessarily be a bad choice.  But, after seeing the other potential GMs and reading up on them I have to admit I think I would feel kinda "blah"/let down if Raye ended up as GM. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would assume Paton would want an answer from the Colts fairly quickly with things moving along in SanFran. (ARTICLE: Nick Wagoner 01/27)

I bolded the more salient & relevant items below that pertain to the way they are conducting their search and items pertaining to Paton.

 

SANTA CLARA, Calif. -- Atlanta Falcons offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan hasn't been allowed to speak to the San Francisco 49ers since the parties first met on Jan. 6.

The Niners can't hire Shanahan as their next head coach -- the expected outcome from this extended search -- until after the Super Bowl. But the Niners can have contact with Shanahan again before he sits at the controls of Atlanta's offense in the Super Bowl.

While his focus remains on the Falcons' offense and the Super Bowl, Kyle Shanahan also has his eye on the 49ers and their search for a coach and a general manager. Curtis Compton/Atlanta Journal-Constitution via AP

That contact is set to happen this weekend, as the Niners and Shanahan have scheduled a second interview session. Shanahan has spent this week preparing a game plan for the New England Patriots but now has a window of Friday afternoon through Saturday in which he is eligible to meet with the 49ers.

“It’s worked out pretty good because getting this bye week before the Super Bowl, we have two weeks to prepare for it," Shanahan said Thursday. "We all get the day off on Saturday before we travel on Sunday. So on Saturday, I’m going to do what I did a couple of Saturdays ago and interviewed for the first time. So I’ll get a chance to talk with them again, and we’ll see how it goes.’’

Of course, these meetings will take on a much different tone and look from the initial interview. The Niners honed in on Shanahan as their primary target almost two weeks ago, which means there's little need for trying to determine if Shanahan is the right guy for the job.

Instead, this second meeting will be more focused on what the Niners can do to put Shanahan in the best position to succeed. Niners CEO Jed York said at the outset of this process that he didn't care if he hired a general manager or a coach first, so long as the duo had a good rapport and could work together.

“I think we need to be open and flexible to structure," York said. "We need to make sure that the head coach and the general manager know each other, have a good understanding for each other. Doesn’t mean that they had to have worked together in the past, but they have to have a good respect for each other and a good understanding and know that they have similar visions and philosophies on building a football team.

"And whatever structure is the best with the people that we’re interviewing is the structure that we’re going to go with.”

Half of that equation is presumably complete as the Niners await the chance to formally hire Shanahan. But this weekend's meetings will be largely devoted to finishing the puzzle. In addition to meeting with Shanahan, the Niners are also set to meet with their two remaining general manager candidates, Minnesota Vikings assistant general manager George Paton and Arizona Cardinals vice president of player personnel Terry McDonough.

Paton and McDonough are the only candidates left from the team's initial pool for the general manager job, and both will be in their second meeting with the Niners. This time, though, it's expected that Shanahan will participate in those meetings, which are scheduled to take place in Atlanta. Involving Shanahan would allow the Niners the chance to see how he interacts with Paton and McDonough and help them compare and contrast philosophies for building a team.

With no restrictions on when they can hire a general manager, it's possible the 49ers could choose one of the candidates and hire him before Shanahan would be eligible to be hired officially. That will likely depend on who hits it off with Shanahan.

Speaking to the MMQB podcast this week, Shanahan didn't sound fazed by the fact that the 49ers are looking to hire a coach again after firing each of their past two head coaches after just one season.

“You got to look into every situation for what they have, what they’re saying,” Shanahan said. “I got to talk to them a couple of weeks ago. I’ll be allowed to talk to them again this week. We’ll see what their plans are -- don’t really know yet. But that’s definitely something that’s enticing, and you hope to have an opportunity because everything takes time.

“I’ve believed it for a while. You always want the right opportunity. But I’ve been battle-tested. I think I went through a lot of situations that a lot of coordinators in the league haven’t. I think I’ve had to handle some situations or got some attention, mostly negative, that usually head coaches only have to deal with. So I think that’s helped me prepare from that standpoint.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

GEORGE PATON MAY NOT ACCEPT POTENTIAL OFFER

SUNDAY, JANUARY 29, 2017 10:24 AM EST
Minnesota Vikings assistant general manager George Paton is not a lock to accept the San Francisco 49ers' general manager job if he is offered the position, according to multiple league sources.

 

I'd be just as happy with Paton.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/28/2017 at 9:41 AM, #12. said:

just as Belichick did

 

I'm sorry, what?

 

Belichick was the Browns head coach for five years, and only made the playoffs once. He doesn't belong on your list.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/28/2017 at 9:50 AM, NewColtsFan said:

 

Not only does Florio not have a good batting average for predictions,  but this one is incredibly poor.     

 

He fires Grigson,  does a 6-man search with the top names for the new GM.    Passes on the 5 outsiders to promote Jimmy Raye.     But then, if the team does poorly next year,  (which would be on Grigson/Pagano)  Irsay would use that as an excuse to also fire Raye after one year.

 

That's among the lamest bit of analysis and forecasting I've ever read.

 

I'd be embarrassed to write that with my name attached.

 

Wait until Superman reads this!!         :peek:                  :facepalm:

 

This is why I typically don't read Florio.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎1‎/‎28‎/‎2017 at 9:50 AM, NewColtsFan said:

 

Not only does Florio not have a good batting average for predictions,  but this one is incredibly poor.     

 

He fires Grigson,  does a 6-man search with the top names for the new GM.    Passes on the 5 outsiders to promote Jimmy Raye.     But then, if the team does poorly next year,  (which would be on Grigson/Pagano)  Irsay would use that as an excuse to also fire Raye after one year.

 

That's among the lamest bit of analysis and forecasting I've ever read.

 

I'd be embarrassed to write that with my name attached.

 

Wait until Superman reads this!!         :peek:                  :facepalm:

That guy is a huge Colts hater. What a turd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wouldn't consider #10 a diss..... but I have a bit of an issue with the Cowpies ranked #2 at the same time.   We not only shut them out last season, we out manned, out-muscled and intimidated them in a way that none of us have seen a Colts team do to any team in a long, long time.   You could say "well its only one game".... and that's true.   But that was a statement game, and I just don't see how Brandt can justify a #2 ranking for Dallas given each team's additions this off-season....not to mention all those other teams he has them ranked ahead of.   As for the Colts...on our own merits.... I would have us closer to the middle of the pack on this list, around 7th and certainly ahead of Dallas.
    • His mom sounds awesome.  
    • Sigh...........   This is beyond really frustrating.    You're accusing me of things I literally haven't done.     That's very Irish of you.    Really annoying.      You ask for benefit of the doubt while never giving it out yourself.   I've put certain things into bold.   I'll try taking them one at a time.   Your first bold...   that this is not me saying that teams that aren't doing this are stupid.    I'm sorry, but when you declare that you've come up that you think is clearly and obvously better,  that you think you've re-invented the wheel and sliced bread,  it certainly feels like you're casting a disapporving eye toward any team that's not doing things your preferred way as a matter of course.   Then you claim,  that I want Ballard in the building ASAP,  but not before January.    Let me see if you understand this word.....   NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!   Was that clear enough for you?       If Irsay had decided in the spring of 16 to fire Grigson and hire Ballard in the spring, I would've been ok with it.   It's not desirable,  but if Irsay made that call THEN,  I'd be ok with it.     Where YOU mis-read me,  is that roughly 95 of owners make this decision during the season.    They see things they don't like and they decide during the season to make a change -- typically when the season ends.    Sometimes, an exec will be fired during the season and someone like Dorsey comes in during the season to oversee things and learn about the organization.    I'm fine with that.  There's no record of me opposing that.   I start with January,  because that's when the business season starts for front office and coaches.   Period.   The NFL views it as preferrable.    But making the switch in the spring is doable, as I've said in every post, and which you have ignored or confused badly.    But if Ballard had been hired in the spring of 16,  I'd have been fine with it.   This isn't the first time I've said some version of this.    This is not some ah-ha moment.   As to the bold declaring that there are tons of qualified guys and that CHOOSING the best guy is another story.   Here's my reponse to that.   No.   nonsense.     They are the same story.    They are connected.    Because you play down the fact that most GM's and most HC's fail.   They get fired before their 4 or 5 year contracts expire.   The owner has seen enough and makes a change.   Saying there are always qualified guys is meaningless.    Because FINDING the best guy who will succeed, isn't just important,  it's EVERYTHING.   All 32 teams can announce they hired a qualified guy.    That isn't hard.    But the vast majority of teams are introducing his successor in a few years.    That's why a franchise like Pittsburgh has very little turnover either in HC or the front office.   While franchises like the Jets or Buffalo or Miami are introducing someone new so often, you can practically set your watch to it.     Generally speaking,  the new GM has a long history of scouting and evaluating talent.   The new HC has a history of success, both as a position coach and a coordinator.   They can easily be called qualified,  (though new guys like Kliff Kingsbury and Zack Taylor do NOT have a long track record of success)  But the vast majority of hires...   are soon enough fired.   That doesn't speak well to their qualifications.      As to you meaning what you're saying...   Of course you mean what you say and I stated that clearly.  I don't know why this should rub you the wrong way.  I literally wrote that I know you mean what you say.    I said what I said as a rhetorical point,  not an attacking point.    My ultimate point was made at the end of my first post to you.   You typically write persuasive arguments.    You're able to frequently made me see your viewpoint.    But not here.    You accuse me of not considering your argument.    I'm sorry,  I am considering what you write.   But I don't see the typical high quality Superman argument.   I don't see points that connect.    Your argument feels like the one you'd make for doable.   It doesn't convince me at all that it's preferable.  
    • Yeah, Ballard said he's a patient guy, and he doesn't mind waiting to pick. We almost traded back from 34 as well if Rock wasn't there. I personally love the "trade back" strategy at the end of round 1, and wouldn't mind doing it in most every draft. A late 1st for a mid-second and early/mid second (from the Redskins) over two drafts is fine with me!
    • Haven't done research on the 2020 draft yet, but if it ends up having an elite WR or OT, I wouldn't mind trading up this year. We'll have to see where we finish (hopefully 32 ), and make a decision from there. Ballard landing the Redskins 2nd rounder may be a brilliant move.
  • Members

    • Jcrane

      Jcrane 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SVFD Colts Fan

      SVFD Colts Fan 37

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,322

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Old Colt

      Old Colt 292

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pacolts56

      pacolts56 3,035

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • gnet550

      gnet550 219

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 7,668

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Rackeen305

      Rackeen305 209

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 110

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • deadman

      deadman 198

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...