Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

A Feel Good Andrew Luck Story from the Way Back Machine....


NewColtsFan

Recommended Posts

 

So,  this is a story that's nearly 10 years old.     It just surfaced on one of the Stanford websites that I'm on.

 

The scene is that it's the late summer of 2007,  Luck has already given his verbal to Stanford, but it's still about 6 more months to Letter of Intent signing day.

 

And Jim Harbaugh has found another player he wants to offer.    Another quarterback.    Now, high school kids can be funny,  you recruit more than one QB in a class and some of them are going to get bent and maybe decide to go to another school.     So the Stanford football staff decides that Harbaugh should call Luck personally and inform him of the decision to offer this other QB.   Better to hear this from Harbaugh,  then the grapevine or another school.     The other QB is also from Texas.     So, Harbaugh calls and explains that this other QB has freakish athleticism and while they'll create a package for him to be a QB,  they see him as a WR where his incredible athletic skills can be better used.

 

At some point early on in the conversation, Luck, who is not quite yet 18,  cuts-off Harbaugh and says.....   "Coach,  you don't EVER have to inform me of what you're doing to make Stanford better.     Whatever you're doing,  I'm fine with.     Just go ahead and do it.    And, if you have the kid's number,  give it to me,  and I'll call the kid and try to recruit him to come to Stanford."

 

Anyway....   the call ends and the staff looks at each other with a real "Holy Poop" moment.    17 year old kids just normally aren't wired that way.

 

Oh,  if you haven't figured it out yet....   the other Texas HS QB with the freakish athleticism who ultimately turned down Stanford?      Robert Griffin the 3rd.

 

Happy New Year.       

 

Rooting for a Colts win tomorrow.      An 8-8 season makes for a better off-season than 7-9.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
    • In a year when the Colts were in serious need of a QB and in position to draft one, Ballard came up in front of the media 3 days before the draft and straight up said something to the effect of "That guy everybody in media is talking about(Levis), we are not taking him". I don't know why you think the Colts are trying to throw us off the scent this year specifically. They are not trying to give us away the pick(thus the vagueness), but I also don't really think they are trying to mislead anybody. This usually becomes specifically apparent in retrospect after the draft when you look back at a lot of those quotes in the videos they release pre-draft... and they were talking precisely about players we ended up drafting, which they reveal in the post-draft video by extending some of those quotes(they did that with AR last year for example).    And about why people are doing it(guessing who they are talking about) - because it is fun. Nobody has the illusion that we will be right in our guesses 100% of the time... or anywhere close really... but it's still fun. And it's part of why the Colts release those videos with those quotes - to create engagement with the fanbase... part of which, and the entirety of which that 70 pages thread and whole board is about in the offseason. is to guess who the Colts might take and how they might feel about specific prospects.
    • Sir, I was just trying to help you out. No good deed goes unpunished! 
    • Not the least bit surprised to hear from you at this moment.   You see me in an uncomfortable conversation (with a moderator no less) and you seize the moment to take a shot at me.  And you try to act like you’re giving me a sincere explanation of what you’re doing.   Like you have an ounce of credibility with me.      This is not the first time you’ve done this.  While I may not be surprised, I’m certainly disappointed.   
    • Things have now gone from bad to worse.     After I explained myself, I was kind of hoping you’d simply come back with “I’m sorry, I misunderstood you,  may bad.”  And we’d be done with this.  It would be over.      But instead, you double down on the roommate issue and follow up by questioning everything I said by breaking down some of my comments and what you think I really meant by them.     In other words, you’re telling me my motive, my meaning, as if you know my meaning better than I do.    It’s interesting to me…. I was recently told there’s an unofficial moderator policy:  don’t attack the poster, attack the argument.    Well, I don’t see that here.  You attacked me personally the first time and instead of a simple apology, you’ve double downed on a bad hand by attacking me personally AGAIN.      Why you’re comfortable telling me you know my meaning , my intention, better than I do is mystifying to me.  And frankly, I think you’re comfortable doing this because one of us is a moderator, and it certainly is NOT me.     I’ll say it again: you misunderstood my meaning, and intention,  the first time, and you’ve misunderstood me even worse the second time.   As I said before, I’m happy to withdraw and apologize for “go figure”, but the negative inference was not my intention.  Poorly phrased, I give you (in two posts now).   I don’t know what else to say…. I’m hoping this brings this very unfortunate exchange to an end.       
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...