Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Jay Kirk

Jay Kirk Baseball Thread since 2017: The 2020 season, Nationals Repeat?

Recommended Posts

I have to admit, I thought the Mets would take 2 of 3 in this series. I am pleasantly surprised. @NFLfan has deGrom pitching tomorrow, Mets will probably take that one.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

We are only 2 games out of 1st place now in the NL Central. Cards are now 73-59, Cubs are at 71-61 and have a 2 game lead over the Phillies who are 69-63 for that final wildcard spot. Cubs have just 30 games left.

To add to this the Brewers are still hanging around at 68-65. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I have to admit, I thought the Mets would take 2 of 3 in this series. I am pleasantly surprised. @NFLfan has deGrom pitching tomorrow, Mets will probably take that one.

 

You're jinxing us. hahaCubs will sweep. 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, HOZER said:

 

I think you have told me this before. Sorry lots of blows to my head have taken their toll! 

 

It it takes me about 20 mins to drive to work, sometimes longer with construction or traffic. I think it’d be neat to live in New York, maybe not forever, but for a while and work downtown, use the subways and other forms of transport. A lot of people I talk to about living there say no thanks due to the traffic, crime, etc, but IDK something’s always appealed to me about New York.

 

Crime is not high in NYC anymore, especially not in Manhattan. Compared to other big cities, crime rate is low. It has one of the lowest murder rates per capita. Other big cities are much higher. My mom is 80 and she has gone out by herself or with her other 80ish year old friends at night and they feel safe. Last Christmas, she went to midnight mass and walked home alone at around 2am (church was only 1/4 mile away). She did not want us to pick her up or send an Uber.

 

Anyway, you should visit. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

1-1 Cubs at Mets, Top of the 6th. Lester vs deGrom

 

Mets getting swept :(

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Cubs trying to pull off a shocking sweep of the Mets at NY. Not over yet though. Cubs lead 4-1 in the 8th.

 

Getting swept at home (6 in a row) allows me to focus on football. :D

(I'm looking at the bright side haha)

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

Getting swept at home (6 in a row) allows me to focus on football. :D

(I'm looking at the bright side haha)

I hear ya, I am more into baseball right now. I have watched maybe 10 minutes of the Colts game tonight. Kelly looked ok, Walker had a TD pass that was dropped. Cubs are in the middle of a playoff push, Luck gave me a gut punch lmao . 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fly the flag Hozer, Cubs win 4-1 and sweep the Mets, impressive because that was at NY. Kimbrel closes it down. 72-61 now on the season and only 1.5 back in the NL Central of the 73-59 Cards. Cubs now have a strangle hold on that final wildcard spot at worse. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Fly the flag Hozer, Cubs win 4-1 and sweep the Mets, impressive because that was at NY. Kimbrel closes it down. 72-61 now on the season and only 1.5 back in the NL Central of the 73-59 Cards. Cubs now have a strangle hold on that final wildcard spot at worse. 

 

Caratini with 2 HRs tonight! Wow!

 

4F057BFA-19A5-433C-9DBB-07EB5AE91869.thumb.jpeg.c226553f26f1b8965ce2e4102da246ac.jpeg

 

 

31 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

Getting swept at home (6 in a row) allows me to focus on football. :D

(I'm looking at the bright side haha)

 

Sorry friend...hopefully football makes it all better :hug:

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, HOZER said:

 

Caratini with 2 HRs tonight! Wow!

 

4F057BFA-19A5-433C-9DBB-07EB5AE91869.thumb.jpeg.c226553f26f1b8965ce2e4102da246ac.jpeg

 

 

 

Sorry friend...hopefully football makes it all better :hug:

@NFLfan, sorry about that series. I like the Mets but love the Cubs. Look at the bright side, football is coming and you have Captain Kirk :thmup:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

@NFLfan, sorry about that series. I like the Mets but love the Cubs. Look at the bright side, football is coming and you have Captain Kirk :thmup:

 

You know I don't like Kirk. I would take Case over Kirk. Case is more of a gamer and the players had great chemistry with him. Kirk is not genuine.

 

I'm worried we may cut my favorite QB on the Vikes: Kyle Sloter. 

  • Sad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you guys think about this story? 

 

https://sports.yahoo.com/report-mixture-of-opioids-alcohol-led-to-death-of-angels-p-tyler-skaggs-200750671.html
"Medical reports show that Tyler Skaggs had fentanyl, oxycodone and alcohol in his system when he died."

 

His family has hired an attorney to find out who gave him the drugs. In their statement, they said that this is "out of character" for their son and

 

"We were shocked to learn that it may involve an employee of the Los Angeles Angels."

 

I don't know but it seems like the family is trying to blame others for their son's actions. This was an adult. What happened to personal responsibility? Unless he did not know what he was ingesting, I don't see what case they have. 

 

Thoughts??

  • Sad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

What do you guys think about this story? 

 

https://sports.yahoo.com/report-mixture-of-opioids-alcohol-led-to-death-of-angels-p-tyler-skaggs-200750671.html
"Medical reports show that Tyler Skaggs had fentanyl, oxycodone and alcohol in his system when he died."

 

His family has hired an attorney to find out who gave him the drugs. In their statement, they said that this is "out of character" for their son and

 

"We were shocked to learn that it may involve an employee of the Los Angeles Angels."

 

I don't know but it seems like the family is trying to blame others for their son's actions. This was an adult. What happened to personal responsibility? Unless he did not know what he was ingesting, I don't see what case they have. 

 

Thoughts??

Sad story but one should always know what they are ingesting unless someone poisons them without them not knowing. I am not buying he did not know he was drinking Alcohol or taking drugs. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cubs lead 6-0 over the Brewers now in the 7th. Me thinks after last season the Brewers got big headed. They look like toast to me. Win the WS before getting big headed lmao . 

 

In all seriousness they are not winning a lot of games with walkoffs and teams making silly mistakes against them this year. I kept saying they were lucky as hell last season, it looks like I was right unless they go on a tear in September.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This was too easy. Cubs win 7-1 over the BrewCrew. Cubs are now 73-61 and have won 4 in a row. Only 1 game behind the 1st place Cards in the NL Central who are 73-59. Cubs now have a 3 game lead over the Phillies who are 69-63 for the last wildcard spot. Fly the flag Hozer.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

This was too easy. Cubs win 7-1 over the BrewCrew. Cubs are now 73-61 and have won 4 in a row. Only 1 game behind the 1st place Cards in the NL Central who are 73-59. Cubs now have a 3 game lead over the Phillies who are 69-63 for the last wildcard spot. Fly the flag Hozer.

CUBS ON A ROLL BABY!!!!!!

 

4F057BFA-19A5-433C-9DBB-07EB5AE91869.thumb.jpeg.c226553f26f1b8965ce2e4102da246ac.jpeg

1 hour ago, NFLfan said:

What do you guys think about this story? 

 

https://sports.yahoo.com/report-mixture-of-opioids-alcohol-led-to-death-of-angels-p-tyler-skaggs-200750671.html
"Medical reports show that Tyler Skaggs had fentanyl, oxycodone and alcohol in his system when he died."

 

His family has hired an attorney to find out who gave him the drugs. In their statement, they said that this is "out of character" for their son and

 

"We were shocked to learn that it may involve an employee of the Los Angeles Angels."

 

I don't know but it seems like the family is trying to blame others for their son's actions. This was an adult. What happened to personal responsibility? Unless he did not know what he was ingesting, I don't see what case they have. 

 

Thoughts??

That’s so sad! Hope they bust whoever gave home that crap, and charge him with man slaughter!!!!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, NFLfan said:

 

I don't know but it seems like the family is trying to blame others for their son's actions. This was an adult. What happened to personal responsibility? Unless he did not know what he was ingesting, I don't see what case they have. 

 

Thoughts??

 

I totally understand where you’re coming from though, he was definitely responsible for his own actions and unfortunately paid the price for it. Although, I have seen it one too many times where people die of overdoses and the investigation ends there, no push to try and find the supplier and maybe stop him from enabling many more users, you know, cut off the supply, at least temporarily. I had a good friend that I went to high school with, father of four, who had been in recovery and doing great, die of an overdose two months ago. A lot of his friends, including myself, wish we could get our hands on his dealer, or at least been there to stop him from using.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, HOZER said:

 

I totally understand where you’re coming from though, he was definitely responsible for his own actions and unfortunately paid the price for it. Although, I have seen it one too many times where people die of overdoses and the investigation ends there, no push to try and find the supplier and maybe stop him from enabling many more users, you know, cut off the supply, at least temporarily. I had a good friend that I went to high school with, father of four, who had been in recovery and doing great, die of an overdose two months ago. A lot of his friends, including myself, wish we could get our hands on his dealer, or at least been there to stop him from using.

 

I'm sorry to hear about your friend and anyone else who may have died of an overdose. It is so sad. My condolences. 

 

In this particular story, it seems that the family is saying that they know for sure that it was someone in the Angels organization that supplied the drugs. There is nothing in their statement that faults their son in any way. I have met many people who claim that it is others who are to blame for their teenage or adult children's behavior. It is doing the child a disservice. IMO. 

 

As for prosecuting the person who gave him the drugs, I am all for that.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cards game got postponed, so the NL Central standings heading into the last day of August (August 31st) look like this:

 

Cards 73-59

Cubs 71-59 (1 back)

Brewers 68-66 (6 back)

 

Cubs are 3.5 games ahead of the Phillies for that final wildcard spot. Phillies are 69-64, they lost tonight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Cards game got postponed, so the NL Central standings heading into the last day of August (August 31st) look like this:

 

Cards 73-59

Cubs 73-61 (1 back)

Brewers 68-66 (6 back)

 

Cubs are 3.5 games ahead of the Phillies for that final wildcard spot. Phillies are 69-64, they lost tonight.

I wonder if the Cards are playing a double header today? Cubs are actually 73-61 lol.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will the real Cole Hammels please stand up? Brewers off to a quick start, lead the Cubs 2-0 mid first. Let’s see if the bats keep going for the Cubs today!!!

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Welp Cubs lose, 2-0 took the day off I guess? Hammels ended up settling down after that first inning and had a pretty good game. We’ll get them tomorrow!

 

Currently sitting in Victory Field with my son watching the Indianapolis Indians play the Columbus Clippers. Good times!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, HOZER said:

Welp Cubs lose, 2-0 took the day off I guess? Hammels ended up settling down after that first inning and had a pretty good game. We’ll get them tomorrow!

 

Currently sitting in Victory Field with my son watching the Indianapolis Indians play the Columbus Clippers. Good times!

At least the Phillies lost again. Cubs still currently hold a 3.5 game lead for that final wildcard spot as September begins. Cubs are at 73-62 and the Phillies are at 69-65. Regarding winning the division, it is still possible. Cards are 2.5 ahead at 75-59 but have been winning almost every night lately. If we just make the playoffs I will be happy because anything can happen as long as you get in. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

0-0 to the bottom of the 2nd, BrewCrew at Cubs. Chatwood going today, it was supposed to be Yu but Yu is out because of arm tightness. Rizzo also is sitting out due to a sore back.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrigley just showed a boy out in the crowd probably 12 or 13 or so eating a fruit bowl while his mom sitting next to him had 3 Hot Dogs on a plate. Then they showed a little girl probably 5 drinking out of a water bottle the size of a 2 liter, she could barely lift it :funny:. Still 0-0 to the bottom of the 3rd. So far Chatwood has been good through 3.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ben Zobrist is back, he was signed to the extended roster and is actually in the dug out today. If we make the playoffs, Zobrist is eligible to play now.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brewers lead 1-0 to the bottom of the 5th. Cubs still have plenty of time but the offense has done nothing in 2 days. Hey Klay Thompson from the Warriors is here at the game. They just showed him, he is a big Cubs fan. Looks like he was eating wings lmao . The girl he is with was drinking a beer haha 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, HOZER said:

Unreal.

Yeah shut out 2 days in a row, not good. I think the Cards will win the division but I have thought for a while. We are still in complete control of the final wildcard spot. Getting shutout 2 days in a row at home is concerning though. Just have to move on and clinch a playoff spot no matter how we get in.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Cubs lead 5-1 in the bottom of the 7th over the Mariners. A win here keeps the Cubs in complete control of the wildcard spot.

Rizzo and Schwarber save the day!!!!

 

4F057BFA-19A5-433C-9DBB-07EB5AE91869.thumb.jpeg.c226553f26f1b8965ce2e4102da246ac.jpeg

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, HOZER said:

Rizzo and Schwarber save the day!!!!

 

4F057BFA-19A5-433C-9DBB-07EB5AE91869.thumb.jpeg.c226553f26f1b8965ce2e4102da246ac.jpeg

Yep we went 24 innings without scoring a run and then we erupted to win 5-1. Cards won again today and go to 77-60. We are still only 3 games behind them in the NL Central at 74-63. The Phillies won too but are just 71-65. Cubs are 2.5 games ahead of the Phillies for that final wildcard spot. We do not play the Phillies again this season. This is the way it looks heading into September 3rd folks.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They judged from training camp throughout preseason.  I don't think it was a mistake because clearly he was making plays.  I'm not sure how much room they had to anticipate he wouldn't be ready during the live games.  His case happened a bit different from Fountain, but they both when all the smoke cleared needed to sit and learn on the PS a little bit. 
    • Fromm is basically an upgraded Jacoby Brissett, a high-end game manager that won't turn the ball over and makes enough plays to win you some games. I'd take Fromm over JB.    I'd say take a guy like Jordan Love or Jacob Eason with the Redskins pick and develop them for a year under JB. End of next year, stick with whichever guy you're more confident will take you where you wanna go. 
    • Once Funchess hits the field either this week or next and assuming he gives us solid production throughout could we not just rework the contract if we want to bring him back?  I don't see this as a total waste with the 1 year contract he received. 
    • If, both Funchess and Campbell were healthy, I don’t think The WR position would look like a major need going into 2020. Fortunately, 2020 is loaded at WR and I wouldn’t be against taking one in Round #1.    The only FA WR I’d consider is A. Cooper, which won’t happen.   DT, CB, TE and possibly QB should the main positions addressed early in 2020.    
    • Are there true "Kelly fans"? Or did you put that in semi-quotes because it's a euphemism for something else?   I disagree with some of your characterizations of Kelly and Hoyer, but what I really disagree with is your characterization of the situation and the calculus of the staff. And I guess part of that goes back to your evaluation of Kelly.   Just think about his situation. We know he has physical tools, he had some good performances in college, and he hasn't been in trouble recently. Yet, he was the last player picked in his draft class, the Broncos didn't keep him despite having a terrible QB situation, he sat on the market until May, played well in preseason, but still cleared waivers in mid-September despite several teams having bad QB situations (Steelers, Jaguars, Washington, Eagles, Panthers, just a sample of teams that had early season QB injuries), then signed back to our practice squad. And he sat on our practice squad for two months without being plucked away (and yes, we're paying him active roster money, but another team could match that and give him a three week automatic spot on the active roster).   Now, you and other "Kelly fans" might think highly of his prospects, but you at least have to admit that he's not highly coveted by the rest of the NFL. It's entirely possible that the only reason he's even on an NFL team is because of his connection with Frank Reich. Other teams might feel like he's a talented project who needs to develop, but they might not have been convinced that he would put in the work and stay out of trouble. Reich felt like he could check both of those boxes, but that doesn't mean Kelly isn't still a project. That's my read on the reason Kelly was signed, cleared waivers, and stuck on our practice squad. I could be wrong, but I'm just connecting the dots.    If that's close to accurate, it doesn't really matter whether he's more talented than Hoyer. (There's another free agent QB who is way more talented and proven than Hoyer, and his initials are also "CK," but there are other reasons he's not on an NFL roster. Whether it's right or wrong, roster decisions don't just come down to talent, especially with QBs.) This is not a simple black/white evaluation of whether he's stable enough to be on the roster, in which case he should play over Hoyer, or if not, he shouldn't be on the roster at all. That's a gross oversimplification.   To the bolded, I especially disagree with that. I assume that Kelly stays on the active roster the rest of the season, barring a significant series of events that makes his roster spot absolutely critical. I don't think JB will be 100% for the rest of the season, so I think they'll carry three QBs as long as they can. I could be wrong.   And as it relates to Hoyer, I think these recent evaluations of him are overly harsh. I'm not and never have been excited about him as a QB, but he's done what a typical backup QB does throughout his career. He's not going to carry your team to victory, but he can run the offense. He's had a bunch of turnovers the last two games, but that's not typical of him. Before the Miami game, he hadn't had a multiple INT game in his last 21 starts, going back to 2014. He's a 60% passer who had a .500 record prior to a bunch of starts for a dreadful Niners team in 2017.   I'm thinking the reason he looked so bad against Miami is that our receivers were hurt, the OL didn't play well, and he made a couple bad decisions. (I also think Frank Reich left two thirds of his playbook in Kansas City, but that's a topic for another thread.) I don't think he's useless, I think he's a reasonable backup that was thrown out there in a terrible situation, and I don't think he got the help he needed from the rest of the offense. You say Hoyer weakens the team relative to Kelly, but that's heavily based on your bullish projection of Kelly. It's certainly not based on anything Kelly has done in the NFL.   Perhaps Kelly would have played better, but make a realistic assessment of the situation, and think about whether it would have been ideal to put him out there under those circumstances for his first real NFL game.    Hoyer vs Kelly isn't really a compelling argument for me. Right now, I'd rather have Hoyer play, but I think Kelly has way more upside. Overall, I hope JB is ready to go for the rest of the season (and I hope he starts giving his receivers more chances to make plays down the field), because he's better than both of them right now. If that's the case, we're arguing about which backup QB dresses but doesn't play on Sundays. Again, not compelling, IMO.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...