Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
First, I learned something today: I didn't know a team could not start with the ball in both halves based on their coin-toss verbiage. Why does the NFL even allow this as an option? Strategically, is there a scenario a team would decide they're better off not starting with the ball in both halves? Perhaps if the team thinks their offense is so horrendous they want to limit their time of possession to avoid turnovers, or they don't have enough offense players in uniform? Screw it. Get rid of the rule. Â Second, the referees continue to prove their incompetence. By default, it should be assumed the team wants to start with the ball in the second half! Are we sure these are professional NFL referees? When does common sense prevail? -
.thumb.jpg.ffc6dad925a32fa3da70aa3bff19d25a.jpg)
By Jared Cisneros · Posted
That would be so Colts to win this game after the year we've had.  I just want to see a Rock-Ya-Sin INT for a TD! -
-
-
By Jared Cisneros · Posted
Redskins lost and Giants won, so we could have the 2nd pick in the 2nd round as well. Looking like a very good trade by Ballard!Â
-
-
Members
-
.thumb.jpg.ffc6dad925a32fa3da70aa3bff19d25a.jpg)
