Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Do you think that we'd currently be better off if....


Dustin

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, southwest1 said:

If you wanna make the inference [let's see SW1 do a better job than Caldwell with 1 SB ring with the Ravens & a SB appearance in 2009] My reply is this: I have no desire to be an NFL HC. I just want my team the Colts to win more than 1 Lombardi trophy. 

 

Jim Caldwell knew full well going in what the high demands of his head coaching position were. Those expectations were laid out by Bill Polian & our owner & Jimmy felt it necessary to make a change after the 2011 season. I had no control over Caldwell's dismissal. The Irsay Family did that. Not me. Yes, I did voice my displeasure on this forum over Jim's difficulty to make sideline adjustments over several games, but at the end of the day, Jimmy was cutting Caldwell's check not little old me. And, by that same token, when Jimmy felt compelled to make a change...Irsay cut him loose not me. 

 

The NFL business is cut throat & all coaches understand how fickle their job security really is. Jim Mora knew it, Tony Dungy knew it, Jim Caldwell knew it, & Chuck Pagano knows it. 

 

This is all fine, but isn't the point. The vague reference was to how odd your reverse discrimination point was.

 

Additionally, that previous response, especially the last paragraph (first sentence aside), was all opinion stated as fact, which drives me nuts. Could be I need to look at all posts as unstated opinion. Personal problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

12 hours ago, buccolts said:

 

This is all fine, but isn't the point. The vague reference was to how odd your reverse discrimination point was.

 

Additionally, that previous response, especially the last paragraph (first sentence aside), was all opinion stated as fact, which drives me nuts. Could be I need to look at all posts as unstated opinion. Personal problem.

Why was my reverse discrimination point odd? I'm not asking you to justify your point of view at all BC. You are free to express whatever position you want naturally. I just get tired of some coaches keeping their jobs simply because a certain segment of society is underrepresented on the NFL sidelines. Yes, I know Caldwell's SB ring with the Ravens buys him a lot of cache. I get that. Jim has managed the Lions well this yr & I'm not trying to run the man out of Michigan. 

 

Maybe it's because some coaches keep their jobs longer than they deserve simply because a HC is well liked by the owner, players, & staff in the building. Chemistry & community relations have their significance sure. I just struggle with keeping head coaches on the payroll just too long for the team's own good. 

 

If everybody just wrote statistics & mind numbing facts in every post, this forum would lose subscribers by a landslide in a period of a few months. Part of the appeal of sports is the emotional attachment fans have toward players & the outlet sports provide from the rigors of our daily lives. You like Caldwell as a coach & I think he's overrated. It's as simple as that. It's not like forum members are paid by the INDY Star or USA Today to write weekly columns in the Sports section you know. 

 

We're cool. I have no qualms with you at all BC & I like regulars who acknowledge their biases upfront as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
    • In a year when the Colts were in serious need of a QB and in position to draft one, Ballard came up in front of the media 3 days before the draft and straight up said something to the effect of "That guy everybody in media is talking about(Levis), we are not taking him". I don't know why you think the Colts are trying to throw us off the scent this year specifically. They are not trying to give us away the pick(thus the vagueness), but I also don't really think they are trying to mislead anybody. This usually becomes specifically apparent in retrospect after the draft when you look back at a lot of those quotes in the videos they release pre-draft... and they were talking precisely about players we ended up drafting, which they reveal in the post-draft video by extending some of those quotes(they did that with AR last year for example).    And about why people are doing it(guessing who they are talking about) - because it is fun. Nobody has the illusion that we will be right in our guesses 100% of the time... or anywhere close really... but it's still fun. And it's part of why the Colts release those videos with those quotes - to create engagement with the fanbase... part of which, and the entirety of which that 70 pages thread and whole board is about in the offseason. is to guess who the Colts might take and how they might feel about specific prospects.
    • Sir, I was just trying to help you out. No good deed goes unpunished! 
    • Not the least bit surprised to hear from you at this moment.   You see me in an uncomfortable conversation (with a moderator no less) and you seize the moment to take a shot at me.  And you try to act like you’re giving me a sincere explanation of what you’re doing.   Like you have an ounce of credibility with me.      This is not the first time you’ve done this.  While I may not be surprised, I’m certainly disappointed.   
    • Things have now gone from bad to worse.     After I explained myself, I was kind of hoping you’d simply come back with “I’m sorry, I misunderstood you,  may bad.”  And we’d be done with this.  It would be over.      But instead, you double down on the roommate issue and follow up by questioning everything I said by breaking down some of my comments and what you think I really meant by them.     In other words, you’re telling me my motive, my meaning, as if you know my meaning better than I do.    It’s interesting to me…. I was recently told there’s an unofficial moderator policy:  don’t attack the poster, attack the argument.    Well, I don’t see that here.  You attacked me personally the first time and instead of a simple apology, you’ve double downed on a bad hand by attacking me personally AGAIN.      Why you’re comfortable telling me you know my meaning , my intention, better than I do is mystifying to me.  And frankly, I think you’re comfortable doing this because one of us is a moderator, and it certainly is NOT me.     I’ll say it again: you misunderstood my meaning, and intention,  the first time, and you’ve misunderstood me even worse the second time.   As I said before, I’m happy to withdraw and apologize for “go figure”, but the negative inference was not my intention.  Poorly phrased, I give you (in two posts now).   I don’t know what else to say…. I’m hoping this brings this very unfortunate exchange to an end.       
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...