Colts Vs. Titans Game Day Thread
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By MikeCurtis · Posted
I get the thought process, but the long haul approach, done correctly, can produce multiple trophies, vs a single trophy There are so many instances in pro sports where the win now, at all costs approach, has produced a really good team for one year...... But... more often than not .... it has produced a disfunctional team that implodes soon. The Jags are a great recent example You may get 11-5 team one year, then 4-12 , for 2-3 years ....... For me, the right mindset starts first, bringing in the right leadership, then the right players with the right attitude........ Of COURSE I wanted a DE in FA.... but..... hopefully we get a little better this year, and can get deeper in the playoffs -
I definitely know a bunch of the mid-later round guys. My issue is more just time. It's the busy time of year at work and we have a bunch of mandatory OT over the next few weeks. I know I could commit for one night, but every night for a week I just know isn't happening. -
Better than doing it after he played 75% of the snaps. -
By Mr.NotSoCreative · Posted
Our attitude should be to win by any means necessary to win championships. Especially when you have the means. Brady wasnt the only star FA signing by Tampa that "bought" their Lombardi. Fournette, Suh, Antonio freakin Brown, Brady, Gronk. Not to mention they are all resigned. Not against what Ballard is doing by any stretch but which path to getting there shouldnt be as nit picked either. I like the long haul approach just want that trophy also. -
Superstars rarely hit FA anymore...so I don't begrudge Ballard for not signing them. You have to trade for them...and that's what he did with DeFo. But there is definitely a medium between signing a handful of FA cheap backups...and signing a bunch of expensive FAs. And recent SB participants have definitely used FA to help build their teams at times, so it definitely has its benefits. Ballard has really only been aggressive at addressing 3T. But that was also his 4th offseason. Wentz wasn't an aggressive move...it was a value play. It was the cheapest option (in terms of cost and draft capital) that they thought had the best chance to work out.
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts