Colts Vs. Chiefs Game Day Thread
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By NewColtsFan · Posted
If you look at my post, I literally wrote the sentence “unless someone asks for WAY too much”... So, if we were at an impasse, THEN Ballard would have the political cover to make a deal. But, that would have to be the circumstance. That the player is holding out and asking for way too much for something like this to happen. But, you’ve moved the goal line. Your previous arguments were to trade Q and Darius because they played the wrong positions to financially build around. Your other argument was to trade them because they wanted market value and it was your view that top market value was too much. NOW, your view is if they ask for an unreasonable over-the-market number. Ok, if that scenario were to happen, I think Ballard would be willing to make a deal. That said, the Colts have one of the top financial teams in the NFL. We make very good, very competitive offers. We convince players to take either no signing bonus, or a small signing bonus. This past season Ballard was named by agents as the best and most fair GM to deal with. He is admired and respected. I do not see the scenario you’ve created happening. Could it? Sure, but highly, highly unlikely. A long shot at best. -
By danlhart87 · Posted
I voted other because @WarGhost21has proven it is possible to get quality edge at 54 and plenty of talent still available OT wise for his 3rd Rounder he acquired -
-
By danlhart87 · Posted
With the 199th pick in the 6th Round the New England Patriots select Tom Br... -
By EastStreet · Posted
I'd actually go back and sabotage Mora's hire, leading to the Colts hiring BB in 98, 2 years before he takes the Pats job.
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts