Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Are the Colts Getting Comfortable With Losing?


Evansville Blue

Recommended Posts

After more than a decade of the Peyton Manning era excellence we have slowly succumbed to a culture of losing. It seems that since last year, the Colts have gotten progressively worse in all phases. We can't run the ball, we can't stop the run. Special Teams is marginal at best and our defense is just as bad. And after giving Luck that huge contract, protecting him was supposed to be our number 1 priority. Folks, we just played an 0-3 team, that had five hits and 3 sacks on Luck in the first half! They ran on us at will, our pass rush was for the most part nonexistent and the secondary got blasted. Let's be honest, this team and the coaching are fundamentally flawed. I was disappointed when Grigs and Pags weren't let go and I think that Mr. Irsay now wishes that he'd done what he had planned to do. The Colts have learned to accept losing and we are going to be this way for a long time if it isn't stopped soon. I like Pags, but he just isn't cutting it and Grigs are bringing in the wrong personnel. There are way too many flaws in this team that have only gotten worse over the years. Let's not be foolish, but let us face the facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right lets not be foolish.

 

So why the heck would the PRO FOOTBALL TEAM that is full of PRO FOOTBALL PLAYERS that are paid to win PRO FOOTBALL GAMES, be comfortable with losing?

 

Granted I don't know this myself. For all we know, you may be right. But I highly highly highly doubt it. Nobody likes to lose, especially the guys who actually lost. The players who lost today are obviously more disappointed than we are.

 

Just because a team loses a lot doesn't mean they're comfortable with losing. Even the Cleveland Browns hate losing. Now they're obviously some players who don't care, and some teams that hate losing more than others. But in general, most players and ALL teams hate losing, and are never comfortable with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mean that the team likes losing, however the chemistry make up  of some teams can take loosing less seriously than others. For instance, if you have a team with several guys who aren't "all-in" like Reggie alluded to his last season with the Colts.These type of players will not leave it all on the field, they are there for a paycheck only. Whether they are about to retire or want to go to another team.

 

We have a lot of inexperienced rookies with some at times, questionable coaching. Some of the older vets see this and realize their chances of hoisting the Lombardi that year are dashed so they might just do enough to get by. For some of these guys after many losing seasons in the league they just throttle back, trying to not get hurt. The whole scenario can be complicated, but just sayin...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The roster page has now been updated, Ogletree is no longer listed as on the exempt list. So my bad, Holder was right.    Good news.
    • Was that the only good receiver taken in that draft? And did they give up multiple picks?
    • Yeah, I have no beef with MHJ as a prospect (I think some are pumping him up a little too much, and there's some name recognition probably influencing the way he's talked about). It would be awesome to have him on the Colts. But just like every other draft prospect in history, the possibility exists that he will not live up to the pre-draft expectations.    But during the pre-draft process, fans and media start falling in love with players. Terms like "generational talent," "future superstar," etc., start getting thrown around. And now we're talking about a prospect as if he's a lock for the HOF before he's even played a game in the NFL. That's fine, it's fun, we all do it. But that's different from actually scouting, setting a board, and making decisions for the team.   Each of us can point to a previous prospect that we loved and raved about and had them fitted for a gold jacket, but who bounced out of the league within 3-4 years. And the same is probably true for NFL scouts and decision makers. Which is why Ballard's comment today -- there is no such thing as a perfect prospect -- is so important to remember. I'm not against the team identifying a guy they really want and going up to get him, but I hope they're not just doing it with stars in their eyes.
    • Would Cincy have made the SB without taking Chase at #5. I got the answer, and it is easy, it is a FAT NO. They would have never got by KC as great as Burrow is. Giving up next years 1st round pick isn't the end of the world to land a generational WR. We still have picks in rounds 2-7 if we did that. 
    • Definitely was, but essentially all of them received the same punishment initially.     Just thought it was curious, especially right before the draft. Has to put the CB spot for the Eagles in limbo.     Been wondering if Jontay Porter's NBA lifetime ban had any play in the decision.   Rodgers did bet on his own team.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...