Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

LucasOilStadium

Colts @ Broncos Game Day Thread

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Mr.Debonair said:

 Vontae has the ability to be a top 5 corner but does not always play like one.

 

Anderson is good.

 

Green has ability but calling him very green is a stretch after 1 game.

 

DQ is not good, Mathis is a shell of himself, Cole sucks, Moore isn't good, Walden not good, McGill average.

 

you can call me a bandwagon fan all you want. I'm just not a blind homer like you

I'm not gonna turn this thread into a personal fight between us.  I bet this D looks better when we get everyone back. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SteelCityColt said:

 

Agreed we can't go man to man with the personal we've got out there but soft zone is just inviting the slow death by the running game and the dink and dunk under.

 

Quite frankly whatever we do on D we're going to be up against it with so many out. Why can't people see this??

Regardless our best shot coming in was to invite a shoot out. Still not too late but we gotta get something going before half.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, LJpalmbeacher said:

So I Moore is good..........NOT!

He got stiff armed on a crossing route. Not much defense for that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 21isSuperman said:

22+ mins of play, we have 52 offensive yards and have given up over 200 yards on defense

 

We might actually be worse than new Orleans defense from last year lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 21isSuperman said:

Who would you replace him with, at this point in the season?

That, I have no clue. What is going on with this %? Our players have no grit and get hurt too easily.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 21isSuperman said:

22+ mins of play, we have 52 offensive yards and have given up over 200 yards on defense

Not good 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't move the ball, can't stop their offense. Yeah, we are going 0-2.

 

Chargers look really strong - Rivers will tear this defense apart. That's 0-3. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SteelCityColt said:

 

Agreed we can't go man to man with the personal we've got out there but soft zone is just inviting the slow death by the running game and the dink and dunk under.

 

Quite frankly whatever we do on D we're going to be up against it with so many out. Why can't people see this??

I guess what we're both saying is: We need to move the ball and score 30 points

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

where is big mouth Mike on here?.....be patient with Pagano he says...coach an GM have both had enough time to draft and DEVELOP talent.....Defense totally sucks ...DBs are a bunch of soccer players that if they ever get close enough to the opposite teams' player...they get hurt.  We pick up players past their prime and expect them to deliver, reward pieces of crap like Costanzo with huge contracts and we wonder why we suck

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 21isSuperman said:

22+ mins of play, we have 52 offensive yards and have given up over 200 yards on defense

 

Just now, bluebombers87 said:

Regardless our best shot coming in was to invite a shoot out. Still not too late but we gotta get something going before half.

 

Agree and agree. The best Defense we could put out their today would be to keep them on the bench as much as possible but the O is stuttering again. It's maddeningly frustrating. I know we're up against Denver and they are a very very good unit, but I really do think this O has the ability to be special when it's clicking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MOB said:

That, I have no clue. What is going on with this %? Our players have no grit and get hurt too easily.

If/when Rex gets fired, I wouldn't mind considering him as our next DC if we part ways with Monachino.  But as of now, I think we stick with him.

 

Great play recognition by Butler!  Hopefully he isn't hurt too bad.  We can't have more injuries to the secondary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MOB said:

That, I have no clue. What is going on with this %? Our players have no grit and get hurt too easily.

 

Wait players getting hurt is now on the DC?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 21isSuperman said:

If/when Rex gets fired, I wouldn't mind considering him as our next DC if we part ways with Monachino.  But as of now, I think we stick with him.

 

Great play recognition by Butler!  Hopefully he isn't hurt too bad.  We can't have more injuries to the secondary

Rex would let his ego in the way before accepting anything less than HC. I truly hope he goes back to it considering how he is as an HC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SteelCityColt said:

 

Wait players getting hurt is now on the DC?

 

Conditioning too. This is unacceptable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Indyfan4life said:

Butler INT! Of course that would happen though. 

Even when something good happens, we can't just get away with it at that.  We have to have an injury or something thrown in there

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never seen injury situations like this. Every single play I'm expecting a Colt to be on the ground 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish all of the negative Nancy posters would settle down and wait until we aren't using 5th string guys on defense. When everyone is back and if the defense is still sucking, then you can be your happy and negative self. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nelson was a no brainer in my opinion.  Even though his position has less value, he is so good that it makes up quite a bit of ground.  Smith pick has been fantastic.  He's playing at a high level at a higher valued position.   It sucks that the org was in a position to have to spend so much draft capital on interior linemen, but that was where they were weakest by far.  Luck used to get pummeled right up the middle.  It is amazing how good he played when he was getting all that pressure in his face.  It is hard to scramble well when the pressure comes directly from between the tackles.   I think everyone is underestimating some of the effectiveness of the players on this team because of the terrible QB play and the collapse of a young defense during the last month.   Prior to the last month the D was very good.   The rushing offense is fantastic on this one dimensional team.   Doug the elephant in the room is that we went from a great QB to a crap one.  It is impossible to discuss everything else without getting into Jacoby.    With Luck, we could be playing in 2 weeks IMO.  I am not saying that for sure, but I think it would be possible for the team to show up better than KC.  We might have even had homefield advantage.  Their run D is subpar and probably we could have exploited that.  I think it would have been probable that the Colts would have improved more than KC improved since the playoff game a year ago.     I think it would be tough, but I also think that beating KC is a daunting task for anyone.   I think anyone counting out Rock is short sighted.  He played relatively well with the exception of that one game.  I think he's a good one.     I agree we need a DT, but who doesn't?  SF and a couple other teams maybe.   Again, I think an above average guy, a top 3rd QB would have this team right up there.  I think we would need to fill a couple of other needs to be on KC, SF, maybe NO level.
    • If AC retires  Draft QB round 1 or Kinlaw Draft Jones OT round 2
    • How much does Becton weigh? Some sites say 370 some say 340
    • I I never said anything about the timeline.  Once again, you said you thought Glenn retired because he was PO'd that Polian drafted his replacement.  I replied, as stated above, that I know for a fact that is not what happened.  Then you replied that maybe he wasn't po'ed, etc etc. to which I just explained why Glenn retired, something that, because of a family member, I had some inside information on, when I first posted what actually happened I thought you would appreciate knowing that, I didn't know you were going to start whining because what you thought was, in fact, wrong.    I didn't attack your posts, I did not say that your timeline was wrong, I just said Glenn did not retire because he was po'ed that Polian drafted his replacement... he retired because HE DIDN'T HAVE THE DESIRE TO LOSE THE WEIGHT NECESSARY TO CONTINUE.  You are the only one that started crying about attacking posts, blah blah blah.
    • Damn, didn't know that. That's brutal.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...