Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

cjrulli

Pass protection was great!

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, BlueShoe said:

Our O-Line is going to be good. I liked what I saw as the game went along.

I like our starters.  I still have some reservations here or there about playing a team that blitzes a lot.  Skys the limit if we handle that well.   Didn't feel Detroit did too much blitzing.  We'll see a lot against the Broncos, but they may back that stuff up if Luck starts skinning them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Gavin said:

Going to wait till the All 22 is out and PFF Grades before I comment about the O Line

PFFFFFFFFF....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, krunk said:

Somebody please call Nate Irving back

Taking the place of who?  Sio or the other backups?  McNary?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, BrentMc11 said:

Taking the place of who?  Sio or the other backups?  McNary?

Mcnary. He doesn't cover or even play the run well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Gavin said:

Mcnary. He doesn't cover or even play the run well

He's not going anywhere.  Let's see what Morrison can do more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"#Colts left side duo of LT Anthony Castonzo and LG Jack Mewhort was particularly strong, allowing just one hit and one hurry combined."

— Rand Getlin (@Rand_Getlin) Sep 12, 2016

 

 

The #Colts [o-line] allowed just 1 sack and 7 total pressures on 51 passing plays … ranks 4th … so far this week. https://t.co/9az9Lr4hV6

— Rand Getlin (@Rand_Getlin) Sep 12, 2016

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

Yeah, all three were fouls. I am sure they missed some on the Colts too but the hit on Luck bothered me because weak or not you can't hit the QB like that when they give themselves up, again not so much because it impacted the game, it didn't really, but more so because of principal of the rule which is to protect QBs.

 Oliver Luck believes there may be something sinister going on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Outstanding.  Good missed once on a twist and Kelly was pushed back into Luck on a three step drop, but overall, if they protect him like they did this game, we could very well lead the league in scoring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wanna say when Luck can step up into the pocket set up and deliver he looks really good . Cant remember a line that gave him that leisure seems luck has been running around making things happen since he was drafted .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jack played an amazing game. Still looks hurt to me though. Hopefully we can get him rest between plays. Myself personally still have wait until week 3 of this year. We'll know what this team is all about then. More test are ahead for our team. Not just offensively, but our defense as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, BrentMc11 said:

He's not going anywhere.  Let's see what Morrison can do more.

Honestly Moose did a good job yesterday highlighting on a passing play for a TD,to one of the running backs that DQ was telling Morrison the play was coming right at him and Morrison just couldn't get there.  

 

I also know several people covering the Colts have pointed out Morrison is more like DQ and not really built to cover.  I know Holder said at one point if you don't like seeing DQ covering tightends you really don't want to see Morrison doing it.

 

Honestly yesterday showed me just how much we miss Freeman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

Honestly Moose did a good job yesterday highlighting on a passing play for a TD,to one of the running backs that DQ was telling Morrison the play was coming right at him and Morrison just couldn't get there.  

 

I also know several people covering the Colts have pointed out Morrison is more like DQ and not really built to cover.  I know Holder said at one point if you don't like seeing DQ covering tightends you really don't want to see Morrison doing it.

 

Honestly yesterday showed me just how much we miss Freeman.

Not really he is no better with the Bears , maybe when secondary is healthy they can use Geathers in some TE situations , but really don't know the answer . Morrison was pretty good overall for first game. Just think the missed coverage was inexperience. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't see it.     Ballard isn't one to make big moves.  And I don't think he's going to want to pay an RB big money either.     People like to start these rumors simply because we have all sorts of cap space to pay guys who are looking for big extensions that their clubs arn't giving to them.  But Ballard doesn't like to spend big money on outside players.   
    • My question is that if he can do those drills, and it's a calf/ankle problem. . . What can't he do that would prevent him from playing in a game?     I mean the only other things I can think of is get hit and run.     I am hoping that this is an injury that wouldn't keep him out of a meaningful game.  But it's hard to say, they don't give us much to go on.  
    • Depends on your definition of a blowout.  IMO both the Jets and Pats game we’re blowouts.     No question on the Chiefs game.     Again, all those were because of non quality depth.  I really think that’s been addressed.  Which is why I’m calling for none of that this season.  
    • He was but Ballard felt like moving down and getting the second rounder next year was worth losing him.     I'm ok with it, CB was also sort of a need and Ballard got Rock instead + a #2 next year.  Geathers is an ok stop gap until then.  But if we're looking at the 2020 draft this early, Strong Safety is the one need from 2018 that we didn't really fill.  So I would say it has to top the early list.    
    • If it would happen now, and structured properly, it would never affect signing those guys to longterm contracts... 
  • Members

    • unitas2berry

      unitas2berry 45

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Calmack

      Calmack 353

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Btown_Colt

      Btown_Colt 383

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CantBeStopped

      CantBeStopped 427

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bsteves

      bsteves 150

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PrincetonTiger

      PrincetonTiger 8,844

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Archer

      Archer 976

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 382

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Reidm

      Reidm 123

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SaturdayAllDay

      SaturdayAllDay 930

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...