Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts not done addressing lackluster running game


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hope we dont waste a 1st round on a runningback this year like seriously runningbacks you can get anywhere shesh even boom herron was good for us and idc if we had AP we need to fix our OL  so we can be able to run... look what mcfadden did for the cowboys.. he wouldnt put those numbers up with us!! its theOL.. ik hes not saying hes going rb first round but id atleast wait till next year when the "year of the runningbacks" class is here to get a RB im fine with what we have with the new additions fix the OL

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, lollygagger8 said:

http://cbs4indy.com/2016/03/23/colts-not-done-addressing-lackluster-running-game/

 

 

“There’s those elite backs that are going to be in this draft,’’ he said. “You have an elite back that’s in your midst (and) that’s hard to pass on sometimes as well.’’

 

 

 

It sounds like he's talking about Ezekiel Elliot who is the second coming of Edgerin James IMO. But the best way to address the lackluster running game is to fix the O-Line you can have an average back go over 1000 yards behind an above average or solid Line.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, lollygagger8 said:

"With the 18th pick of the 2016 draft the Indianapolis Colts pick Ezekiel Elliott"

 

If that happens Colts fans will........

 

mind-blown.jpg

 

 

if that happens, i will personally supply the rope for the gallows

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Whoever we draft in the first round better be a contributor. Personally I would be disappointed if we went with a RB in round 1 knowing the issues that need to be address at OL and Rush LB. I think you are more likely to get a good RB in lets say the 3rd or 4th round than you are to get a good Rush LB or OT. That's just my observation.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, chad72 said:

Both Ezekiel Elliott and Laquon Treadwell, I will pray will be taken before #18.

 

I will hold a pitchfork vigil outside 56th St. if one of them is taken, just kidding :):) 

 

No way on Treadwell - but Zeke makes sense (and not just because I'm a Buckeye).

 

You have to admit, RB is a position of need going forward.  We can't just keep taking guys in the late rounds and hope they work out.  None have so far, right?  Definition of insanity and all that.

 

So, here's my argument - name any guy at any position you'd want in the first round, and I bet there's a guy who's going to be nearly just as good available in the second.

 

No one is going to be as good as Zeke in the second.  I don't want to get my hopes up because I think he'll be gone before our pick.  But if we took him, my head would explode from happiness.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, PeterBowman said:

Here's the thing.....would Zeke provide more value at rb than anyone else at their position who might be available at 18?

no one can answer that for sure.  if the board falls a certain way i'd be ok with him

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't mind Zeke. You could get players as good at the other positions people want us to take in the later rounds. No one later will be as good as Zeke. He's probably better than anyone in the 2017 class as well.

 

But to give an example of what I'm talking about:

 

Some people want edge guys like Lawson or Spence, but you could get Calhoun, Fackrell, or Correa later.

 

Some want OL like Kelly and Conklin but you can get Dahl, Westerman, Martin, Allen, etc...later.

 

No later round RB can be just as good as Zeke. He's already really good in pass protection among other things.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pgt_rob said:

Colts take running back in the 1st round. This forum will explode.

I would be fine with it if it's Zeke. He'd give us 8+ years of a great run game that we haven't had since Edge. He's also a good pass blocker and catcher which I'm sure the Colts like. I doubt he's even available at 18 but if he is I wouldn't be mad if he's the pick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have way too many holes to fill than to take a RB in the 1st round IMO. Elliott is going to be a top 10 back in the NFL, but I'd rather get a star offensive lineman or a star defensive player at 18. A lot of very good RB's go in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th round. And there's some good one's in this years class that we could get in one of those three rounds. My pick right now would be Kenneth Dixon. I wouldn't mind any of the following in the 3rd or 4th. But 1 or 2 of these guys will go in the 2nd.

 

Kenneth Dixon

Paul Perkins

Alex Collins

CJ Prosise

Jordan Howard

Jonathan Williams

 

I think Elliott, Henry, and Booker will be the first 3 off the board. And does anybody know anything about Jhurell Pressley? He looks really good in his highlights. He looks to have great footwork, great cuts, and looks explosive as hell, but I don't remember him at the combine, and didn't even realize he was in the draft this year. Seen he ran a 4.38 40 at New Mexico's pro day. Also I want us to get Keith Marshall bad. He could be the biggest steal of this draft. I think he'll definitely fall to the 5th or maybe even later. We should be all over that. If that kid can stay healthy he can be a very good back. Dixon/Prosise in the 3rd, and Marshall in the 5th or so could give us an elite RB duo for the next 4 years or so anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RockThatBlue said:

I would be fine with it if it's Zeke. He'd give us 8+ years of a great run game that we haven't had since Edge. He's also a good pass blocker and catcher which I'm sure the Colts like. I doubt he's even available at 18 but if he is I wouldn't be mad if he's the pick.

I think hes way gone by 18. Theres some descent o-lines ahead of 18 that would grab him.(hopefully not in our division).

Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher said:

What about Kenyan Drake,Ala. in the 3rd/4th round?

 

If we don't get Zeke, Drake would be a steal in the 4th.  He's more of a Reggie Bush type, not an every down back like Elliott.

 

i wouldn't be surprised if he has a better career than Henry.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, jim scheurich said:

I think hes way gone by 18. Theres some descent o-lines ahead of 18 that would grab him.(hopefully not in our division).

Honestly I do like Elliott A LOT...but I think we have bigger needs to address on the OL and at rush end that I would feel more comfortable addressing. Had we selected him last year at our pick I would have been totally ok with it though.

 

Hopefully Tennessee takes him at 1 imo....since they seem to be collecting rbs and they don't have a line to run behind yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Smonroe said:

 

If we don't get Zeke, Drake would be a steal in the 4th.  He's more of a Reggie Bush type, not an every down back like Elliott.

 

i wouldn't be surprised if he has a better career than Henry.

I have him in my mock, rd. 4. And he would be a weapon in the passing game.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dgambill said:

Honestly I do like Elliott A LOT...but I think we have bigger needs to address on the OL and at rush end that I would feel more comfortable addressing. Had we selected him last year at our pick I would have been totally ok with it though.

 

Hopefully Tennessee takes him at 1 imo....since they seem to be collecting rbs and they don't have a line to run behind yet.

can only hope... I think their OL is going to get better, unfortunately..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • IMO the point where you had to have that conversation was last year. And it's now too... and it will be the point until long-term QB is addressed. Just... the moment you don't have a long-term QB is the moment you should start looking for one and not stop until you do have one. Now that doesn't mean that there shouldn't be some room for executive decisions and that's why I have not criticized Ballard for not taking a QB high last year.  Agreed. Again... I give some leeway to Ballard about his QB decisions, he likes whoever he likes and I would rather him draft any other position player that he likes, rather than a QB he doesn't like. But, with every passing FA/trade/draft window, the QB question will continue to become bigger and bigger. If we don't get our long-term QB this off-season it will be 3 years and drafts since Luck's retirement that he will be have the chance to address it. This is not ideal. We are threading water in the meantime. At some point unwillingness to take a shot over a long period of time becomes indecision and inability rather than patience. 
    • Agreed....   at some point.    Where there will be wide disagreement is...   when the point is?    We have a prominent poster who complained back in late November-early December that Ballard had yet to address fixing the long-term QB situation.   And he was exasperated over that.   I noted that Luck had only been retired for roughly 15 months and Ballard has had exactly one free agent window and one draft. That’s it.   I’m re-telling this story not to give that poster a hard time, but simply to say to others here, just be patient.  Hasn’t Ballard earned a high level of trust here?   I think so.   I trust that when Ballard finds a QB he likes, he’ll pull the trigger. 
    • Yeah it is expensive and I'm generally against trading up in the draft, and I'm much more a fan of trading down, but as I've said before there is one exception for that rule. It's the QB. Like with many things QBs tilt the conversation on its head. Just the value if you hit is SO BIG, that you have to do it if you get the chance(and you love the QB sitting there of course). There is practically no bad trade value if you trade up for a QB and he hits.    Also, about the hit rates of QBs. my opinion is that it's not just about the QB and his talent/drive/determination/work ethic. The environment, teammates, coaching, etc. play a big role in whether they succeed or fail. There are very few Andrew Lucks who will succeed no matter what garbage you throw at them(and he was thrown into one of the biggest piles of garbage in the league when it comes to GM-coach combo + the talent around him). For most QBs, even highly drafted, their talent needs to be guided and nurtured in the right direction. And in this line of thoughts - I think some of those QBs could have been successful in another environment and/or with a bit more luck(Darnold/Wentz), while others were probably doomed from the start because of their own failings(Rosen, Trubisky). And here is where I think we actually have somewhat of an advantage. I like our GM and our FO. I like our coach generally(even if I have some playcalling beefs with him). I like our roster and the foundations of our OLine. I think this situation gives better than average chance to a young QB to succeed. It's still no guarantee, but again... at some point you will have to make a move of some sort. We cannot keep rethreading the Rivers' of the world.  At some point Ballard will have to trust his evaluation of a QB he loves and just do what it takes to get him. 
    • Sorry, but no, our window is not closing.   Almost all of Ballard's top players are still on their rookie contracts.   This team is EARLY in it's window.    There is still great opportunity for the Colts.   Your viewpoint is a fan's viewpoint.    It is not the view of how an NFL front office person thinks.   There is still time.   Patience can be your friend.  
  • Members

    • UKColt13

      UKColt13 155

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Moe

      Moe 27

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colt.45

      Colt.45 278

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Architects08

      Architects08 227

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 407

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • WoolMagnet

      WoolMagnet 3,063

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Eharv1

      Eharv1 11

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Behle

      Behle 46

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HungarianColtsFan

      HungarianColtsFan 489

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NannyMcafee

      NannyMcafee 1,622

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...