Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

jim scheurich

defense wins championships

Recommended Posts

I am again wondering if this is the year that our GM gets serious about our defense-and stopping the run in particular. Heck, we'll probably draft a tight end or running back, then WR etc... and pick up a defensive player from IvyTech  as an undrafted.... Sorry for the pessimism fellas, but it just seems like the last time our D was great was Siragusa's rookie year. Hopefully Luck is great this year, but we need a D to help him out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, steveeoaktree33 said:

I am again wondering if this is the year that our GM gets serious about our defense-and stopping the run in particular. Heck, we'll probably draft a tight end or running back, then WR etc... and pick up a defensive player from IvyTech  as an undrafted.... Sorry for the pessimism fellas, but it just seems like the last time our D was great was Siragusa's rookie year. Hopefully Luck is great this year, but we need a D to help him out.

Does your memory lapses happen very often?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats funny, because the exact opposite was always said until this year.

 

When an offensive-oriented team wins again next year, then it'll go back to being offense that wins championships.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, MacDee1975 said:

Thats funny, because the exact opposite was always said until this year.

 

When an offensive-oriented team wins again next year, then it'll go back to being offense that wins championships.

 

 

 

31 - defense 

25 - offense 

 

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/feb/06/does-defense-really-win-championships

 

It seems pretty close truth is a good offense & a to 15 defense is how the Patriots  roll , 

 

Something we should be shooting for ..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO if the Colts can find real balance on both sides of the ball, a team that can keep opposing coaches guessing and not just exploiting whatever is the weakest side. Maybe then will be able to regularly get by the "Hoodie", and a cpl other coaches that have success against the Shoe. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, ÅÐØNϧ 1 said:

 

31 - defense 

25 - offense 

 

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/feb/06/does-defense-really-win-championships

 

It seems pretty close truth is a good offense & a to 15 defense is how the Patriots  roll , 

 

Something we should be shooting for ..

 

When they had good OL protection, it worked. If not, they fall short. 

 

Teams don't challenge them for 60 minutes, that is how you beat teams like the Seahawks and Patriots. Our coach felt it was early enough to go for gadget plays because playing them straight up was not an option for 60 minutes (cough Whalen, snap Whalen) :)

 

So far, the start is just as bad or worse than the Peyton era vs the Patriots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, chad72 said:

 

When they had good OL protection, it worked. If not, they fall short. 

 

Teams don't challenge them for 60 minutes, that is how you beat teams like the Seahawks and Patriots. Our coach felt it was early enough to go for gadget plays because playing them straight up was not an option for 60 minutes (cough Whalen, snap Whalen) :)

 

So far, the start is just as bad or worse than the Peyton era vs the Patriots.

 

I respectfully  disagree 

 

Andrew Luck has 3 11-5 seasons in his first 3 Peyton Manning did not infact i believe his first season was 3-13 with Faulk how much better could 12 have been had he had the same weapons ?   

 And how many seasons did it take for Peyton to get to a AFC Championship ?

 

Not to mention getting to the playoffs & going further each year even without completing his fourth year Luck has done more with less than 18 , 12 has a better record for his first 4 years than 18 . 

Bad or worse that argument is seriously flawed .

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, ÅÐØNϧ 1 said:

 

I respectfully  disagree 

 

Andrew Luck has 3 11-5 seasons in his first 3 Peyton Manning did not infact i believe his first season was 3-13 with Faulk how much better could 12 have been had he had the same weapons ?   

 And how many seasons did it take for Peyton to get to a AFC Championship ?

 

Not to mention getting to the playoffs & going further each year even without completing his fourth year Luck has done more with less than 18 , 12 has a better record for his first 4 years than 18 . 

Bad or worse that argument is seriously flawed .

 

 

 

I said vs the Patriots, not overall. Is it clear now? Even a blind man given the facts can tell you the Luck era is off to a better start than the Peyton era overall.

 

Besides, it is not how you start, it is how you finish. I am just hoping the finish is better than the start. Elway, 0-3 in SBs and if he had not won 1 or won the last 2, he wouldn't even be mentioned as a top 10 QB. Those last 2 SBs put him in the Top 10 conversation, IMO. The finish is important in terms of history.

 

Our performance vs elite teams like the Steelers and Patriots will define how the Luck era will turn things around, as simple as that, IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 9:34 PM, chad72 said:

 

When they had good OL protection, it worked. If not, they fall short. 

 

Teams don't challenge them for 60 minutes, that is how you beat teams like the Seahawks and Patriots. Our coach felt it was early enough to go for gadget plays because playing them straight up was not an option for 60 minutes (cough Whalen, snap Whalen) :)

 

So far, the start is just as bad or worse than the Peyton era vs the Patriots.

They needed a running game or another receiver.

 

You cant beat denver throwing 80 percent of the time

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, aaron11 said:

They needed a running game or another receiver.

 

You cant beat denver throwing 80 percent of the time

 

 

 

Are you talking about the Patriots? Yeah, I agree but frankly, I don't care what they need to do to win in the future. :P

 

I was only talking Patriots in context of the Colts' record against them which is dismal :( and how the Pats' SB run last year happened due to better OL play as the year went farther. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/13/2016 at 0:05 PM, steveeoaktree33 said:

I am again wondering if this is the year that our GM gets serious about our defense-and stopping the run in particular. Heck, we'll probably draft a tight end or running back, then WR etc... and pick up a defensive player from IvyTech  as an undrafted.... Sorry for the pessimism fellas, but it just seems like the last time our D was great was Siragusa's rookie year. Hopefully Luck is great this year, but we need a D to help him out.

Stopping the run isn't enough. You have to be equally effective in rushing the passer. This is a pass-oriented league.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/20/2016 at 10:20 AM, chad72 said:

 

Even a blind man given the facts can tell you the Luck era is off to a better start than the Peyton era overall.

 

 

 

Give that man a cigar .  

 

Its not the start its how you finish   I agree  11-5.3 seasons in a row good starts better at the finish 3 seasons in a row .

 

Its up to the coachs to figure out how to beat New England thats not on the player Peyton had a great career aside from losses to New England its time for the Colts coaching to step up & put there players in a position to win 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Spent most of my adult life working at Edwards AFB.... Chuck and a handful of test pilots allowed our Air Force to make incredible strides putting their lives on the line there.... pushing the boundaries of the planes they flew.   It was nice to see him get a game ball after we beat  the Texans.     
    • I also watched "some" of the pro bowl & Luck did look bad. But it was the skills challenge that was most telling & depressing.  Now surely Luck isn't gonna come out throwing rockets in a silly contest, but the lack of zip on his passes & the horrendous accuracy was shocking.  He may have had the lowest score in history.  Maybe hit the closest targets twice.    That, coupled with the bad playoff game, had me really worried about arm fatigue or a dead arm. Maybe understandable coming off his first year back from surgery?  But maybe there's more there???  Then he skips OTA's &, correct me if I'm wrong, his first pass of his first training camp practice vs the defense was an interception...   Then he didn't practice for a while.  Then came out and "gave it one more go" before the Bengals game & retired the following week.  I doubt Luck walks away from the game because of an ankle injury unless major surgery was the only option.  I think it may have been the shoulder.   And because of that & the way he retired, I don't know if we could get two firsts. I can see a first and a second though. Then again, Elway might give us that and then some...    Regardless, barring this team completely coming off the rails or JB getting injured, I don't think you could just give Luck the job back.  I don't know if the majority of the players would just be ok with that.  This is becoming JB's team as each week passes.  If he gets us to the playoffs & wins a game, I think it'll be tough to take the job from him.     Look at the joy with which Doyle celebrates when we score. The way he looks to JB & congratulates him.  Same for the lineman. It's a tight brotherhood in that locker room. And Luck isn't in there everyday like JB is & how can they trust that Luck has that fire back burning in his belly?  Luck may have gotten Drew Bledsoe'd.    If he comes back, you move him to the NFC for the most ransom you can get. Then we finish putting the key pieces to our Dynasty in place with those picks...  
    • I agree.  Hopefully Turay bounces back healthy and we bring in another young DE or 2, which could reduce the amount of snaps Sheard/Houston get next year, but they are both still playing at a high level and are good character guys and all-around football players.  Sure can't hurt to have our young guys get groomed by those 2.   Since Sheard has been back, it seems like there's been significant improvement in Autry's game as well.
    • He was stationed at Fort Benjamin Harrison in Indianapolis (as per that article).  I found he lives in California now, but then googled "Is Chuck Yeager a Colts Fan?" and came up with this:    https://blog.ticketmaster.com/indianapolis-colts-team-fans/   "The team counts among its loyal followers a number of big-time celebrities, including: • Billy Bob Thornton • Famed test pilot Chuck Yeager • Actor Haley Joel Osment • Comedian/former talk show host David Letterman • Actress Elisabeth Shue • Rob Lowe"   _____________ Pretty cool, Mr. Irsay!
  • Members

    • WoolMagnet

      WoolMagnet 3,835

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • open window

      open window 270

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 8,008

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rockywoj

      rockywoj 1,848

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Caffrey

      Caffrey 79

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • buccolts

      buccolts 3,736

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pacolts56

      pacolts56 3,314

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Architects08

      Architects08 258

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fisticuffs111

      Fisticuffs111 1,994

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Maniac

      Maniac 273

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...