Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts pick 18th [Merge]


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Positions that are OK, 

1. QB (Luck should be healthy and ready to go)

2. WR (No need to draft another receiver Ty, Donte, Dorsett, & (Pratice Squad Carter), if you bring AJ back bring him back as a TE/WR----No Coby F. (he can not block)

3. DL is trending in the right direction.  The tackles made by our average ILB's was pretty high.

 

Positons that need to be address

1. O-Line

2. O-Line

3. Pass Rush OLB

4. Corner Back opposite of V. Davis

5. RB

6. doesn't matter

7. doesn't matter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JR Indy said:

Positions that are OK, 

1. QB (Luck should be healthy and ready to go)

2. WR (No need to draft another receiver Ty, Donte, Dorsett, & (Pratice Squad Carter), if you bring AJ back bring him back as a TE/WR----No Coby F. (he can not block)

3. DL is trending in the right direction.  The tackles made by our average ILB's was pretty high.

 

Positons that need to be address

1. O-Line

2. O-Line

3. Pass Rush OLB

4. Corner Back opposite of V. Davis

5. RB

6. doesn't matter

7. doesn't matter

i can't tell are you saying get rid of fleener lol??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, JR Indy said:

Positions that are OK, 

1. QB (Luck should be healthy and ready to go)

2. WR (No need to draft another receiver Ty, Donte, Dorsett, & (Pratice Squad Carter), if you bring AJ back bring him back as a TE/WR----No Coby F. (he can not block)

3. DL is trending in the right direction.  The tackles made by our average ILB's was pretty high.

 

Positons that need to be address

1. O-Line

2. O-Line

3. Pass Rush OLB

4. Corner Back opposite of V. Davis

5. RB

6. doesn't matter

7. doesn't matter

 

Goodness gracious.

 

Even after 4 years you struggle with Fleener....

 

We did NOT -- repeat, NOT draft Coby Fleener to block.

 

And the added irony is TODAY Fleener caught a TD of about 65 yards.    THAT'S WHY we drafted Coby Fleener.

 

I don't know why this is hard for so many,  but it apparently is......    

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, will426 said:

i can't tell are you saying get rid of fleener lol??

Yes, (we can go back and forward about fleener), but what is most glaring is the lack of blocking on this team (Andrew Luck and every other QB got hurt because of it) and the lack of a pass rush.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

How do the Falcons have a weaker strength of schedule than Indy? Indy played in the worst division alongside the NFC East.

 

We beat the falcons doesn't it go on h2h first? If not its cause they played the NFC east teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JR Indy said:

Yes, (we can go back and forward about fleener), but what is most glaring is the lack of blocking on this team (Andrew Luck and every other QB got hurt because of it) and the lack of a pass rush.

Lol yeah just making sure  so lemme verify...keep injured prone Allen who's liability to be on the field affects his actual in game blocking > fleener who actually produced in the receiving game and is an average blocker? At this point he surpasses Allen due to Allen never contributing to nothing but sitting on the bench tho bro?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Goodness gracious.

 

Even after 4 years you struggle with Fleener....

 

We did NOT -- repeat, NOT draft Coby Fleener to block.

 

And the added irony is TODAY Fleener caught a TD of about 65 yards.    THAT'S WHY we drafted Coby Fleener.

 

I don't know why this is hard for so many,  but it apparently is......    

 

OK man keep Fleener, but it is hard for Fleener to catch these type of TD passes (which is few and far between) when the guy that is suppose to be throwing him the ball is hurt on the sidelines because of a lack of blocking.  I say it again I WAS WRONG KEEP FLEENER.  Sign him to whatever he will demand.  But I hope they draft someone that will block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, will426 said:

Lol yeah just making sure  so lemme verify...keep injured prone Allen who's liability to be on the field affects his actual in game blocking > fleener who actually produced in the receiving game and is an average blocker? At this point he surpasses Allen due to Allen never contributing to nothing but sitting on the bench tho bro?

Will426 I am verifying keep Fleener.  Just DRAFT, DRAFT, DRAFT some blockers this year.  Think about if Luck have better blocking.  Then Luck has more time to find Coby.  And the more times he (COBY) is targeted, the more dangerous this team will be.  The better this team is the more play-off games this team should play next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welp after a vastly disappointing season Indy still doesn't get great draft position. My hope now is that somehow Jaylon Smith falls to them due to injury concerns and he ends up being their ILB of the future. I'd also be happy with CB Mackensie Alexander if he lasts. The OTs available there wont be worth a 1st round pick in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, loudnproudcolt said:

Rams lost, so we draft 18th spot. If we would have lost today, we would have drafted in the 12th spot. Big move down. I know they wanted to win for pags though. If anything it should say to Irsay Grigson is the problem, not pags!

If any firing is done, I'd start with Grigson first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, JR Indy said:

Will426 I am verifying keep Fleener.  Just DRAFT, DRAFT, DRAFT some blockers this year.  Think about if Luck have better blocking.  Then Luck has more time to find Coby.  And the more times he (COBY) is targeted, the more dangerous this team will be.  The better this team is the more play-off games this team should play next year.

Yeah I understand that part but that's more on our Oline than the tightends we underutilized them both badly this year due to how horrible this line has been 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JR Indy said:

First pick RG, Second Pick a rush OLB, Third Pick Right Tackle.  This draft I do not want to hear about the best available player.  All I want to hear about is the best available pass blocker, or pass rusher.

 

No Guards worth picking in first round all guards are projected in 2nd round by ranking but their is 4 tackles projected in the first round

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol yeah just making sure  so lemme verify...keep injured prone Allen who's liability to be on the field affects his actual in game blocking > fleener who actually produced in the receiving game and is an average blocker? At this point he surpasses Allen due to Allen never contributing to nothing but sitting on the bench tho bro?
Will426 I am verifying keep Fleener.  Just DRAFT, DRAFT, DRAFT some blockers this year.  Think about if Luck have better blocking.  Then Luck has more time to find Coby.  And the more times he (COBY) is targeted, the more dangerous this team will be.  The better this team is the more play-off games this team should play next year.

If college offenses weren't so gimmicky drafting linemen wouldn't be such an unpredictable science. As it is it is a total shot in the dark with them.

And Fleener has shown some promise, but is he the tight end of the future? I'm gonna have to say no. He still makes some ponderous drops, and the guy literally broke his first tackle last week. He has all the physicals to be a star TE, but I just don't think it's going to happen for him.

Keep him over Allen, for sure. I've never cared for Allen. But if we get a chance at a better TE, it may be worth taking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ponyboy said:

Well thank goodness they didn't make the playoffs and have to pick 21st.  /sarcasm

 

Still SMH at all the tanking talk of the last three weeks. 

 

You'd rather have them make the playoffs and be embarrassed and 1 and done? Then on top of that picking about 4 spots lower?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to think about tanking, but regardless, just one more loss, today would have given us the 12th pick or

13th position. We would have flipped coins with Oakland at 7-9. Still, I believe Jaylon Smith will be there at 18th since he will not be available next year until October at the earliest. Many teams need players immediately. I would be willing to wait on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

Welp after a vastly disappointing season Indy still doesn't get great draft position. My hope now is that somehow Jaylon Smith falls to them due to injury concerns and he ends up being their ILB of the future. I'd also be happy with CB Mackensie Alexander if he lasts. The OTs available there wont be worth a 1st round pick in my opinion.

 

Idk, Castanzo was the 22nd pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

 

Simple, just by watching this team and the no shows they've demonstrated against quality opponents.

What no shows are you talking about? Take away the Pittsburgh game and we played every quality opponent tough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
    • In a year when the Colts were in serious need of a QB and in position to draft one, Ballard came up in front of the media 3 days before the draft and straight up said something to the effect of "That guy everybody in media is talking about(Levis), we are not taking him". I don't know why you think the Colts are trying to throw us off the scent this year specifically. They are not trying to give us away the pick(thus the vagueness), but I also don't really think they are trying to mislead anybody. This usually becomes specifically apparent in retrospect after the draft when you look back at a lot of those quotes in the videos they release pre-draft... and they were talking precisely about players we ended up drafting, which they reveal in the post-draft video by extending some of those quotes(they did that with AR last year for example).    And about why people are doing it(guessing who they are talking about) - because it is fun. Nobody has the illusion that we will be right in our guesses 100% of the time... or anywhere close really... but it's still fun. And it's part of why the Colts release those videos with those quotes - to create engagement with the fanbase... part of which, and the entirety of which that 70 pages thread and whole board is about in the offseason. is to guess who the Colts might take and how they might feel about specific prospects.
    • Sir, I was just trying to help you out. No good deed goes unpunished! 
    • Not the least bit surprised to hear from you at this moment.   You see me in an uncomfortable conversation (with a moderator no less) and you seize the moment to take a shot at me.  And you try to act like you’re giving me a sincere explanation of what you’re doing.   Like you have an ounce of credibility with me.      This is not the first time you’ve done this.  While I may not be surprised, I’m certainly disappointed.   
    • Things have now gone from bad to worse.     After I explained myself, I was kind of hoping you’d simply come back with “I’m sorry, I misunderstood you,  may bad.”  And we’d be done with this.  It would be over.      But instead, you double down on the roommate issue and follow up by questioning everything I said by breaking down some of my comments and what you think I really meant by them.     In other words, you’re telling me my motive, my meaning, as if you know my meaning better than I do.    It’s interesting to me…. I was recently told there’s an unofficial moderator policy:  don’t attack the poster, attack the argument.    Well, I don’t see that here.  You attacked me personally the first time and instead of a simple apology, you’ve double downed on a bad hand by attacking me personally AGAIN.      Why you’re comfortable telling me you know my meaning , my intention, better than I do is mystifying to me.  And frankly, I think you’re comfortable doing this because one of us is a moderator, and it certainly is NOT me.     I’ll say it again: you misunderstood my meaning, and intention,  the first time, and you’ve misunderstood me even worse the second time.   As I said before, I’m happy to withdraw and apologize for “go figure”, but the negative inference was not my intention.  Poorly phrased, I give you (in two posts now).   I don’t know what else to say…. I’m hoping this brings this very unfortunate exchange to an end.       
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...