-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By DeathByEagle · Posted
Well not really considering 3 of those deals were 1 year contracts for almost 25 mill of it and 14 mill was 1 player. So yes the full life of the contract is prob more important since it affects the future of your team. -
By BlackTiger · Posted
31.5 on outside free agents is a lot compared to what we usually do, the colts tend to sit out or go after cheaper guys. The Eagles total spent on free agents is misleading because it ignores what they already had signed. -
Ah, it's such a bad contract, I would rather not compound the situation and push it down the line any further than it already is. -
By DeathByEagle · Posted
Point is spending a ton in FA doesnt get you to the promise land. Sticking to what has worked and building your team up through the draft and a rare FA can do it in the right system in the right time. Using that money to keep the players you have that know your system well is a bigger benefit. Also Eagles spent 50.6 mill actually in total FA contracts in 2017 which was in the lowest 1/3 in the league. So yes they spent less then 2/3 of the rest of the league and won a SB. -
By smittywerb · Posted
If Rock can get the man coverage part down he’ll be real solid for us. We knew he was a project coming in. I think his draft position is also adding to bad press he gets.
-
-
Members
-
.jpg.03c76055d967f51b813e290416ac9bfa.thumb.jpg.b1d64d49e1863163f4eefe42ad172348.jpg)
Recommended Posts