Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts Vs. Broncos Game Day Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol. you said it was your last post... feel free to post again and I will not reply, so you can "win". I was only hoping you'd address the question/point that you're still avoiding.   Point is, you have not addressed the question specifically about the last 5 years. I guess the Bengals have bucked their history lol. It's not a theory, it's just data. Like I said, I like Irsay, but we simply haven't spent the last 5 years. And like I previously said, GMs don't complain about their budgets publicly. And there's just not a great way to explain 2 straight years of not spending 40+M. You don't have to spend it all, you don't have to sign long term deals.... But that's a lot of money to not spend.
    • No I am not I am looking at a history of a guy who has owned this team for a longer period of four or five years you only want to look at because it supports yours theory but even then it only works if you ignore what the GM has said about not spending money and that he’s about to spend very big money to do what he said he was going to do all along.  Again if you think Jim Irsay is a cheap owner you don’t know what a cheap owner is but think what you want.     any I am sure you will want the last word as you always do have a nice night.
    • And that's fine. We can revisit this at the end of the year. All I'm doing is giving my thoughts on the matter before it becomes evident.
    • I'm providing data/facts. Again, if the Bengals are cheap per your own statement, but have spent more the past 4-5 years, then serial logic would suggest....    You're letting emotion or fandom cloud your opinion. I like Irsay, but it's fair to say that we've been on a budget.
    • Rivers had a ton of time last year, so needing mobility wasn't really an issue. The offensive scheme was conservative and quick trigger. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, but Rivers had plenty of time and could have went deeper had the play calling asked for that.    I highly doubt you'll see significantly more deep throws this season, especially early.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...