Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Boom Herron Waived/injured


backshoulderfade

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 258
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

He's had 3 years. 2 non contact injuries, time to move on. Shelf life for a RB is already short, he's shortened his that much more

That is your opinion, and I respect it you have every right to feel that way. However, sometimes it is good to respect people with different opinions than yours. It has been proven that people with significant injuries can return and produce in the NFL. Like a previous poster stated Demaryius Thomas and Brian Crushing returned from significant injuries and produced with Crushing suffering multiple. It happens in the NFL, so what makes it impossible for Ballard to do it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its scrubs blocking scrubs

 

So you think it's that simple? Offense is all about precision and timing. Defense is all reaction. Who do you think is at a greater disadvantage when they go out and play without any practice? If you say defense it's because you have never played a down in your life! Qb and RB are the two absolute worst positions to be put in to without a practiced OL! Why do you think scores like 9-6 happen in pre-season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you think it's that simple? Offense is all about precision and timing. Defense is all reaction. Who do you think is at a greater disadvantage when they go out and play without any practice? If you say defense it's because you have never played a down in your life! Qb and RB are the two absolute worst positions to be put in to without a practiced OL! Why do you think scores like 9-6 happen in pre-season?

Correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is your opinion, and I respect it you have every right to feel that way. However, sometimes it is good to respect people with different opinions than yours. It has been proven that people with significant injuries can return and produce in the NFL. Like a previous poster stated Demaryius Thomas and Brian Crushing returned from significant injuries and produced with Crushing suffering multiple. It happens in the NFL, so what makes it impossible for Ballard to do it?

 

Name one guy at any position that has come back from an ACL + Achilles tear and been able to play .... name just one! Just a tip, you will be looking for a unicorn not a pony!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ballard got an ACL tear and an achillies tear on his leg that he runs on (he's a rb). He's like RGIII in that sense now, permanently a step slower. Josh Robinson got a concussion, he's not running on his head.

Peterson tore his Acl and Mcl. Not saying Ballard is Peterson, but those kind of injuries are not the career killers they were 20 years ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a "What have you done lately?" League & none of you can give a legit reason based of production lately why Ballard should be on this roster right now. He's finished. An injury waiting to happen every time he touches the ball

So no matter what your opinion is you are not the tell all on what the coaches see every day. You are not a medical specialist so how do you know anything about Ballard? I have no clue as to what Ballard is or isn't going to do and neither do you. You have your opinion so stick to it with your tunnel vision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you think it's that simple? Offense is all about precision and timing. Defense is all reaction. Who do you think is at a greater disadvantage when they go out and play without any practice? If you say defense it's because you have never played a down in your life! Qb and RB are the two absolute worst positions to be put in to without a practiced OL! Why do you think scores like 9-6 happen in pre-season?

So explain why our 3rd string defense gets destroyed by the Bengals every 4th preseason game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peterson tore his Acl and Mcl. Not saying Ballard is Peterson, but those kind of injuries are not the career killers they were 20 years ago

 

I don't recall any RBs ever coming back after an Achilles tear .... maybe a few from ACL tears .... but never from an Achilles .... at least never remotely the same as after the injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol

And keeping Ballard is Grigson refusing to move on when there's better options already on the roster. Well, maybe not better since they're rookies. But more durable at least

 

durable doesnt mean they can play. lets see how they perform when the games are for real

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peterson tore his Acl and Mcl. Not saying Ballard is Peterson, but those kind of injuries are not the career killers they were 20 years ago

That might be true, but I believe Peterson only tore it one time. Ballard tore his ACL, then his Achillies right after. He might be able to play again, but I believe he isn't the same as his rookie year (which was ordinary anyway). I would release him for montee ball if it's possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That might be true, but I believe Peterson only tore it one time. Ballard tore his ACL, then his Achillies right after. He might be able to play again, but I believe he isn't the same as his rookie year (which was ordinary anyway). I would release him for montee ball if it's possible.

 

peterson's injury was way worse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is your opinion, and I respect it you have every right to feel that way. However, sometimes it is good to respect people with different opinions than yours. It has been proven that people with significant injuries can return and produce in the NFL. Like a previous poster stated Demaryius Thomas and Brian Crushing returned from significant injuries and produced with Crushing suffering multiple. It happens in the NFL, so what makes it impossible for Ballard to do it?

Cushing is a bad example, he's hurt basically every year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so you rather have two rookies backing up gore. 

Absolutely. Ballard's rookie year wasn't like Doug Martin or Alfred Morris. It was an 800 yd performance from the easiest position to find quality players. I bet there are easily a few UDFA's that will be as good as Ballard was in his rookie year. Basically Robinson and Varga are Ballard quality players without the leg injuries. If given the chance, they could easily match Ballard's production his rookie year with the same number of carries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Name one guy at any position that has come back from an ACL + Achilles tear and been able to play .... name just one! Just a tip, you will be looking for a unicorn not a pony!

I am not an injury expert never claimed to be, but ACL injuries happen all the time, and people come back and still play at high levels. Achilles are not quite as simple as an ACL, but people still come back and play well after them as well. Yes having both injuries makes it more difficult to come back, but it isn't impossible. I can't say I know anyone that has returned from both, but maybe Ballard will be the 1st. I don't know and you don't know so quit acting like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That might be true, but I believe Peterson only tore it one time. Ballard tore his ACL, then his Achillies right after. He might be able to play again, but I believe he isn't the same as his rookie year (which was ordinary anyway). I would release him for montee ball if it's possible.

Reports that Dallas is trading for Ball

Also, talks that Kam Chancellor is going to the Giants via trade

Crazy stuff lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not an injury expert never claimed to be, but ACL injuries happen all the time, and people come back and still play at high levels. Achilles are not quite as simple as an ACL, but people still come back and play well after them as well. Yes having both injuries makes it more difficult to come back, but it isn't impossible. I can't say I know anyone that has returned from both, but maybe Ballard will be the 1st. I don't know and you don't know so quit acting like it.

 

Look no one said that miracles don't happen. The question is would you bet the farm on that and if the answer is "yes", would people question your sanity?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you talking about? It was a 9-6 game .... nobody scored. If anybody should have scored it should have been us when we had our #1 OL out against their #3 defense..... with Ballard out there!

Watch the other Bengals games from years past

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely. Ballard's rookie year wasn't like Doug Martin or Alfred Morris. It was an 800 yd performance from the easiest position to find quality players. I bet there are easily a few UDFA's that will be as good as Ballard was in his rookie year. Basically Robinson and Varga are Ballard quality players without the leg injuries. If given the chance, they could easily match Ballard's production his rookie year with the same number of carries.

Martin was a first round pick. Ballard started 12 games if memory serves. Brown was starting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look no one said that miracles don't happen. The question is would you bet the farm on that and if the answer is "yes", would people question your sanity?

The problem with that statement is with keeping Ballard we really aren't betting the farm. He is still a depth running back for us and his touches will probably be limited. In a limited role Ballard should be able to get back into football shape and allow his lower body to get underneath him. I am not saying you are wrong. I just respectfully disagree with you, and just adding my opinion, and how I came to look at it the way I do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly doubt that any Rb produces 1000 yards this year with our OL but hopefully I am wrong. I would think 500-600 will be the limit for those with lesser injuries that survive enough games.

Between our O-Line problems in the run game, and most likely rotating RBs in the game I agree with you no one will reach 1000 yards this year as much as I want them to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with that statement is with keeping Ballard we really aren't betting the farm. He is still a depth running back for us and his touches will probably be limited. In a limited role Ballard should be able to get back into football shape and allow his lower body to get underneath him. I am not saying you are wrong. I just respectfully disagree with you, and just adding my opinion, and how I came to look at it the way I do.

 

RB is an injury prone position. You may not think you are betting the farm until the depth chart ahead of him all goes down. You see how quickly it happens. You need insurance , not liability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't go there csmopar, just spent the past hour down that road lol

 

 

I honestly doubt that any Rb produces 1000 yards this year with our OL but hopefully I am wrong. I would think 500-600 will be the limit for those with lesser injuries that survive enough games.

I just wanted to thank you guys for providing your insight and opinions on the situation. I respect your opinions, and you guys do have some valid points in your arguments. The only thing we can do now is wait for the regular season and see what happens with Ballard. I am curious though. With the available options right now on the market at RB who would you rather have than Ballard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...