Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Article on Chud's Role


IndyD4U

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure why there's so much interest in exactly what Chud does, and I'm not sure why there's so much mystery about it, either. Even that interview, when I listened to it, he doesn't give any information about his duties. No one really has since he was hired. I don't really care, but I also don't know why it's being so closely guarded. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had the opportunity to meet him recently. He's a really nice guy, very honest and knowledgeable.

After talking to him I kept thinking what *s the Browns were for firing him. He's the kind of guy you want to represent your franchise. We're lucky to have him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why there's so much interest in exactly what Chud does, and I'm not sure why there's so much mystery about it, either. Even that interview, when I listened to it, he doesn't give any information about his duties. No one really has since he was hired. I don't really care, but I also don't know why it's being so closely guarded.

It has something to due with the fact hes still collecting pay from the Browns. If he accepts an active coaching role, he loses that money. So hes a coach in a "non-coaching" role...getting paid by the Colts AND the Browns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has something to due with the fact hes still collecting pay from the Browns. If he accepts an active coaching role, he loses that money. So hes a coach in a "non-coaching" role...getting paid by the Colts AND the Browns.

 

I'm pretty sure his Browns salary is still being offset by whatever we're paying him. As I understand it, offset language applies as long as he's on a staff, regardless of his role. But there might be something particular in his contract, which would explain the secrecy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure his Browns salary is still being offset by whatever we're paying him. As I understand it, offset language applies as long as he's on a staff, regardless of his role. But there might be something particular in his contract, which would explain the secrecy.

I remember reading somewhere that his offset language specifically bars him from taking a "coaching" job else where. That is why his role is labelled with secrecy. He is not allowed to work directly with players, per terms of his contract.

While he may be working directly with the players behind closed doors, he doesnt want to admit that to the powers that be in Cleveland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think about that old horror move - "C.H.U.D" Cannibalistic Humanoid Underground Dwellers!

Remember the old Simpsons episode when they were going to NYC? Homer was telling the family about how bad his first visit was. He lost his luggage, was robbed, etc. "...and that's when the CHUDS came at me..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why there's so much interest in exactly what Chud does, and I'm not sure why there's so much mystery about it, either. Even that interview, when I listened to it, he doesn't give any information about his duties. No one really has since he was hired. I don't really care, but I also don't know why it's being so closely guarded. 

 

If I had to guess -- and it's only a guess -- I think the mystery surrounding Chud is deliberate.

 

I think he's trying to be respectful to both coordinators.    Chud's trying to make sure that if those groups do well, fans are giving credit to the coordinators and NOT to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Pagano and Chud are old friends and Pagano saw an opportunity to have someone he trusts to bounce ideas off of.  Pagano is a first time HC and sometimes seems a bit insecure in that role, so I'm fine with it myself.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I had to guess -- and it's only a guess -- I think the mystery surrounding Chud is deliberate.

 

I think he's trying to be respectful to both coordinators.    Chud's trying to make sure that if those groups do well, fans are giving credit to the coordinators and NOT to him.

 

Yeah maybe, could be anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I had to guess -- and it's only a guess -- I think the mystery surrounding Chud is deliberate.

 

I think he's trying to be respectful to both coordinators.    Chud's trying to make sure that if those groups do well, fans are giving credit to the coordinators and NOT to him.

 

that could be, but personally I think the off-set language "can't take a 'coaching' job" theory is probably more likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that could be, but personally I think the off-set language "can't take a 'coaching' job" theory is probably more likely.

 

I remember reading somewhere that his offset language specifically bars him from taking a "coaching" job else where. That is why his role is labelled with secrecy. He is not allowed to work directly with players, per terms of his contract.

While he may be working directly with the players behind closed doors, he doesnt want to admit that to the powers that be in Cleveland.

 

I remember something about this when we first hired him, because he was a "special assistant." In terms of contract language, that would probably make a difference.

 

But now, he's an "associate head coach." Any protection that he had as a special assistant is probably gone now, especially if that protection is based on his official title and not his actual role. And yet, no one is talking about what he's actually doing as a member of the staff. I don't really care, but everyone is really evasive about it, which I guess makes sense if it's a contractual issue, but if not, then it makes me wonder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry.    You lost me.     I'm not following your meaning.

 

other people in this thread have speculated that Chud's actual responsibilities and role are kept secret because of the off-set language from his Cleveland contract which would prevent him from having any type of actual coaching duties.  I was just saying that I think that idea is more likely than Chud being so selfless that he doesn't want to take any credit from either Coordinator.  Either are possible and the truth could be neither.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember something about this when we first hired him, because he was a "special assistant." In terms of contract language, that would probably make a difference.

 

But now, he's an "associate head coach." Any protection that he had as a special assistant is probably gone now, especially if that protection is based on his official title and not his actual role. And yet, no one is talking about what he's actually doing as a member of the staff. I don't really care, but everyone is really evasive about it, which I guess makes sense if it's a contractual issue, but if not, then it makes me wonder.

 

very good point...I sometimes forget they changed his title...even though it had been mentioned already in this thread lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

other people in this thread have speculated that Chud's actual responsibilities and role are kept secret because of the off-set language from his Cleveland contract which would prevent him from having any type of actual coaching duties.  I was just saying that I think that idea is more likely than Chud being so selfless that he doesn't want to take any credit from either Coordinator.  Either are possible and the truth could be neither.

 

OK.....

 

But wasn't there a story a number of months back that when Chud's contract was up, he was considering going elsewhere....  I assume that would be to go somewhere else and coach,  likely as an OC.     I wouldn't think it would make sense for Chud to leave to take the same job (assistant head coach) elsewhere.    He's already got that job here with a very good team and he and Pags are long-time friends.

 

So, I don't know if off-set language is in effect at this point.

 

I'm guessing the Colts were able to retain Chud by doing two things......   one,  paying him handsomely -- coordinator money -- and two,  we've made it clear that should things with Pagano not go as hoped for,  Chud would be a serious contender to replace him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK.....

 

But wasn't there a story a number of months back that when Chud's contract was up, he was considering going elsewhere....  I assume that would be to go somewhere else and coach,  likely as an OC.     I wouldn't think it would make sense for Chud to leave to take the same job (assistant head coach) elsewhere.    He's already got that job here with a very good team and he and Pags are long-time friends.

 

So, I don't know if off-set language is in effect at this point.

 

I'm guessing the Colts were able to retain Chud by doing two things......   one,  paying him handsomely -- coordinator money -- and two,  we've made it clear that should things with Pagano not go as hoped for,  Chud would be a serious contender to replace him.

 

yeah, as I said in the reply to Superman's post, I had forgotten that they changed his title to Official Head Coach.  With that being the case then I agree that offsent language is probably not a factor here.

 

However, at the same time I personally don't think there would have been any offers made that he might replace Pagano (or at least I would hope that's the case)...I could see them saying he could take Pep's place because Pep did actually interview, or at least put himself out there to be interviewed, the past 2 years whereas Pagano has repeatedly expressed his desire to remain in Indy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, as I said in the reply to Superman's post, I had forgotten that they changed his title to Official Head Coach.  With that being the case then I agree that offsent language is probably not a factor here.

 

However, at the same time I personally don't think there would have been any offers made that he might replace Pagano (or at least I would hope that's the case)...I could see them saying he could take Pep's place because Pep did actually interview, or at least put himself out there to be interviewed, the past 2 years whereas Pagano has repeatedly expressed his desire to remain in Indy. 

 

Yeah, I don't buy the "maybe you'll replace Pagano" idea either. It seems to me that Pagano is the reason he's even here. Maybe an insurance policy in case Pagano falls ill again, but I doubt that would keep him around. He could have put himself on a clear path to another head coaching job by taking a coordinator position, and then he wouldn't have to rely on Pagano leaving or being unavailable. Like you said, he'd probably be a candidate to replace Pep, who is a hot interview.

 

He definitely got a raise, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, as I said in the reply to Superman's post, I had forgotten that they changed his title to Official Head Coach.  With that being the case then I agree that offsent language is probably not a factor here.

 

However, at the same time I personally don't think there would have been any offers made that he might replace Pagano (or at least I would hope that's the case)...I could see them saying he could take Pep's place because Pep did actually interview, or at least put himself out there to be interviewed, the past 2 years whereas Pagano has repeatedly expressed his desire to remain in Indy. 

 

Very good point by you and my point was poorly thought-through.    You're right that they would've made clear that Chud would be the leading candidate to replace Pep should he no longer be the OC for whatever reason.     My bad on the Pagano future.

Brain cramp by me.

 

Anyway.......   somewhere among all these ideas and thoughts and guesses is something close to the truth.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think theres a difference in "assistant head coach" and "associate head coach" as far as the contract language goes. Hes a paid "associate" to coach Chuck. As long as he isnt working directly with the players, I believe he is entitled to pay from the Browns.

I didnt read the article, so maybe I am wrong, but if his contribution is assisting the coaches with gameplans, watching film, and roster building as a consultant, then technically he is not "coaching".

It doesnt really matter to me, honestly, but I am sure Chud wants to protect his "free money" coming from Cleveland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Game on the line, inconsistent passer at QB, and the OL is the strength of the team. Everyone in the world knew that the first priority was to stop JT. And they couldn't.    I don't know what's with this myth that there's something deficient about JT as a RB. It's nonsense.
    • I think he's probably only using 25% of his playbook so far, for various reasons. Some of that is intentional, as they work in some concepts with a young QB and a young-ish supporting cast.   Another part of it is that the Colts game script has been heavily skewed, especially in the first two games, so the gameplan had to be reduced as the game went along. The offense couldn't stay on the field, and the defense couldn't get off of it. It was better against the Bears, but their offense still ran 30 more plays than ours. Total, our offense has run 87 fewer plays than our opponents. Teams usually script their first 15 offensive plays, and I wonder if the Colts have gotten through that opening script in any of the first three games. So I think there are some things that they'd like to have run, but so far they have not been able to get to them.   I don't think it's a binary 'do we call winning plays, or do we call plays to develop the QB' consideration. I don't necessarily agree that those priorities have to compete with one another, but it does require a balance to do them both justice. I don't think it does this team any good, short term or long term, to restrict Richardson to 15 passing attempts/game, or to use him as an option QB like this is the Navy team, even if they felt like that could be a way to win some games. I also don't think they should coach him as if every game is "winner take all," and have him lay his body on the line or try to drop back 50 times a game.    And we have to blame Richardson and the WRs to a certain extent. There have been a lot of missed throws, drops, and turnovers. Those plays have stalled or ended several possessions, and that's not on the play calling.
    • Gus is aware of this too.  I don’t think Fields can keep this up.  I really like our team this week 
    • The advantages of an offensive minded head coach with a young QB are many. For example, if the HC is installing the offensive system. So if your young QB is a success, when your OC inevitably gets hired away by another team, the offensive structure will remain.    There's also the fact that defensive minded HCs seem to have trouble relating to young QBs. They're inherently risk averse, and overly reliant on their defense, so the overall approach to the game is conservative, which means every mistake by the QB gets highlighted by the coach's negative response. And I don't mean yelling and screaming on the sideline, I mean the QB turns the ball over in the first half, so the rest of the game the offense is super run heavy.    This is not true of all defensive minded guys, and there are some offensive minded HCs who struggle the same way. But I would lean toward an offensive coach if I had a young or developing QB, almost exclusively. I definitely don't think Eberflus is the right guy, but at least he's shown some growth in the last year or two. I was surprised by how much Hard Knocks showed him meeting solo with Caleb Williams.
    • seems slow to me...I don't think those cement inserts are working
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...