Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

PeterBowman

Round 2 and 3 thread

Recommended Posts

3?

 

 

Exactly.  People go way overboard on that narrative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's be honest. We have no clue until they actually play.

I thought Werner was going to be a monster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree he "should" come in and be an impact player....     Who does he have to beat?  

 

Finally DL and a nice pick....      Go Colts

 

Instant starter.

 

Stanford guys are being drafted big time in rounds 2 and 3, it seems like

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's going to be a stud available when we pick 10th tomorrow. If we didn't take a WR 1st Rashad Green in the 4th would have been a steal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just kidding, Miles is a good dude.

Alright my bad for not realizing. I am not defending Miles one way or another I don't know much about him and/or if he eats grass haha. I just don't think he would stick his neck out there and risk being wrong with a situation like this that is all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Love the pick for the Colts. I am biased being a Stanford Cardinal fan. And Ty going in the 3rd... I am very pleased.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Half of Werner's "splash" plays came against BAD teams...      But everyone liked his "motor" ...    It's not over for him...  just out of position.

 

Let's be honest. We have no clue until they actually play.
I thought Werner was going to be a monster.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmm.... Weaknesses

Slender legs, tight hips and boring feet. Feet will stall at contact when squared up against the run. Initial punch by an offensive lineman will jostle him. Lacks power to play inside. On the ground far too often. Must improve hand usage as pass rusher. Can be blocked by tight ends. Benefited from team-oriented defensive scheme. Doesn't gain much ground with initial steps as pass rusher. Relies on hustle sacks and lacks counter moves.

 

 

*production

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmm.... Weaknesses

Slender legs, tight hips and boring feet. Feet will stall at contact when squared up against the run. Initial punch by an offensive lineman will jostle him. Lacks power to play inside. On the ground far too often. Must improve hand usage as pass rusher. Can be blocked by tight ends. Benefited from team-oriented defensive scheme. Doesn't gain much ground with initial steps as pass rusher. Relies on hustle sacks and lacks counter moves.

Yes. Those are some troubling negatives aren't they? The kind that seem difficult to overcome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They play physical football..    .....  I likey.. 

 

Instant starter.

 

Stanford guys are being drafted big time in rounds 2 and 3, it seems like

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they could somehow come away with Grady J, Clemmings, or Dawson tommorrow  I will be really liking this ...

 

I thought we'd be taking a RB in the 4th....

 

Now I think we'll be taking a safety and a RB in the 5th...

 

That's just my hunch....   But wouldn't Clemmings be nice in the 4th?!?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright my bad for not realizing. I am not defending Miles one way or another I don't know much about him and/or if he eats grass haha. I just don't think he would stick his neck out there and risk being wrong with a situation like this that is all.

 

He's well-known for being a little. . . off-the-wall.  Crazy like a fox.  And yes, he likes to graze a bit during games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Half of Werner's "splash" plays came against BAD teams...      But everyone liked his "motor" ...    It's not over for him...  just out of position.

You mean splash play

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Those are some troubling negatives aren't they? The kind that seem difficult to overcome.

 

Seems like it, states even if he bulks up he still may not be very adequate at a pro level from the sounds of the NFL draft analysis.  Still it waits to be seen.

 

Mayock and other seemed to like the pick though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Several good players left in the morning and we don't have too wait long!  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Those are some troubling negatives aren't they? The kind that seem difficult to overcome.

Not sure if you are being sarcastic.....

 

Sources Tell Us "He plays hard like Trent Murphy did at Stanford, but Murphy was a better athlete. He's not explosive enough to be a reliable pass rusher and I don't see him as a run stuffer." -- Pac 12 regional scout

 

Bottom Line

Data driven teams will be intrigued by Anderson's stuffs, impact tackles and total pressures, but the tape doesn't validate his potential to produce these numbers on the pro level. The body type screams 3-4 defensive end if he can bulk up and add power, but he might lack the balance and toughness to make it there. Anderson might just be a "tweener" without a clear NFL position fit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's well-known for being a little. . . off-the-wall.  Crazy like a fox.  And yes, he likes to graze a bit during games.

Sounds like Les Miles and Steve Spurrier must be related somehow then haha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was hoping he'd still be there tomorrow.  Oh well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you are being sarcastic.....

Sources Tell Us "He plays hard like Trent Murphy did at Stanford, but Murphy was a better athlete. He's not explosive enough to be a reliable pass rusher and I don't see him as a run stuffer." -- Pac 12 regional scout

Bottom Line

Data driven teams will be intrigued by Anderson's stuffs, impact tackles and total pressures, but the tape doesn't validate his potential to produce these numbers on the pro level. The body type screams 3-4 defensive end if he can bulk up and add power, but he might lack the balance and toughness to make it there. Anderson might just be a "tweener" without a clear NFL position fit.

That's a less than stellar review.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3?

 

Oh really, that's it ? haha it just seemed like we had plenty of stanford players

 

luck

fleener

howell

whalen

anderson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Those are some troubling negatives aren't they? The kind that seem difficult to overcome.

They also said JJ Watt would slide inside "on occasion" to rush the passer. Old scouting reports are fun to read.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you are being sarcastic.....

 

Sources Tell Us "He plays hard like Trent Murphy did at Stanford, but Murphy was a better athlete. He's not explosive enough to be a reliable pass rusher and I don't see him as a run stuffer." -- Pac 12 regional scout

 

Bottom Line

Data driven teams will be intrigued by Anderson's stuffs, impact tackles and total pressures, but the tape doesn't validate his potential to produce these numbers on the pro level. The body type screams 3-4 defensive end if he can bulk up and add power, but he might lack the balance and toughness to make it there. Anderson might just be a "tweener" without a clear NFL position fit.

It sounds like he is not athletic and has a narrow base. Not the kind of body type I prefer for the Dline.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was talking about college tape genius...    

 

OK...      Oh and compare BjW's stats against all "pass rushers" taken that season... 

 

JUST saying....  First round picks are far from guarantees of success.     FAR FROM IT.

You mean splash play

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh really, that's it ? haha it just seemed like we had plenty of stanford players

 

luck

fleener

howell

whalen

anderson

I have a better shot to make the team than Whalen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was talking about college tape genius...    

 

OK...      Oh and compare BjW's stats against all "pass rushers" taken that season... 

 

JUST saying....  First round picks are far from guarantees of success.     FAR FROM IT.

So he's the best of crappy group? Good argument genius

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We are talking about C Carter's kid now....     he is NO guarantee..      1st pick was a stone cold wake up call to him. 

 

Griff will show up and out work him ....  can he out play him?    I hope so..      Carter's just an entitled name ...  thus the Dorsett pick.

GW will probably be the odd man out

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is what it is...  

 

I can only lead a mule to water...          you know the rest..   :thmup:

 

So he's the best of crappy group? Good argument genius

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Backing off the ledge now.

Hahaha I feel the same way. I want to hate Grigson but this draft is shaping up nicely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Instant starter.

 

Stanford guys are being drafted big time in rounds 2 and 3, it seems like

starter? over who?

 

i cant see team benching arthur jones or langford.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

please TJ CLemmings...

 

or draft Michael Bennett and trade him to the Seahawks for Michael Bennett.

draft Malcolm Brown, trade him to the Patriots for Malcom Brown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes. I think at sometime in this season, CB figured he was not going to be able to go forward with JB as the future and at some point determine where this Kelly kid had the mental strength it will take to become a leader of the team if called upon for the upcoming years. Makes zero sense to keep the kid on the team, not dress him even though JB was hurt/ineffective while still needing cb’s or wr’s due to injuries. He paid him well above the avg PS player salary to keep him here. Just too many signs pointed to CB went above and beyond to keep him here.    look, nobody here has disputed any of the kids football talents. Nobody here has disputed the mental aspect and maturity part of the kids game either. If he has been able to show CB and FR that he has matured, his football skills match up equally as well, of not maybe better than does Love or Heberts games and we know how he fits into the locker room and what he can do in practice. If he doesn’t screw up and maintains the Boy Scout, hard worker this offseason, I’m telling you, Kelly is going to get a fair shot at being the starter here in 2020.    need to have a poll that asks Kelly as starter 2020 yes or no with no other options or comments just so we can come back and see who said what in a thread 
    • I do recall CB saying that about value of the DT, however, he has said this offseason that we absolutely have to get better at the DT spot to make this defense work better. I think he sees that he may have placed that spot a little undervalued for this defense and will take a swing at getting it better in order to really open up the defense. It may have also meant, he placed last years draft tackles at valued starting in the 3rd round based on the talent that was there. Idk. I do think he will take a look at the FA market for a DT (Jones??)  and work inside the draft from there. He is gonna buy a player somewhere this year, bank on it. 
    • Much more complicated than that, even if you exclude the last minute Luck exit.  He also had virtually NO NFL experience. But, yeah, kinda. Not that uncommon with #3 QBs.  He was basically a practice squad guy that was brought up when JB was injured.  No different than the last #3 (walker) really.
    • I agree.  Tho i’m not sure what Ballard is planning on doing in draft.  Maybe he isn't yet either.   I think we all saw what Ballard may be excited about, physically speaking.  I think Ballard is making sure Kelly is getting his head on straight.    I am genuinely excited to see what happens in the draft.  Not sure why, but my gut says he may surprise us this offseason.  Both in the draft and FA.  Strap yourself in!
  • Members

    • Stephen

      Stephen 1,997

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jdubu

      Jdubu 1,304

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nancy

      Nancy 50

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Trace Pyott

      Trace Pyott 271

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Arby0359

      Arby0359 12

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AZColtsAmbassador

      AZColtsAmbassador 8

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • J@son

      J@son 7,332

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 25,065

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 1,385

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • WoolMagnet

      WoolMagnet 4,350

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...