Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

PeterBowman

Round 2 and 3 thread

Recommended Posts

3?

 

 

Exactly.  People go way overboard on that narrative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's be honest. We have no clue until they actually play.

I thought Werner was going to be a monster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree he "should" come in and be an impact player....     Who does he have to beat?  

 

Finally DL and a nice pick....      Go Colts

 

Instant starter.

 

Stanford guys are being drafted big time in rounds 2 and 3, it seems like

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's going to be a stud available when we pick 10th tomorrow. If we didn't take a WR 1st Rashad Green in the 4th would have been a steal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just kidding, Miles is a good dude.

Alright my bad for not realizing. I am not defending Miles one way or another I don't know much about him and/or if he eats grass haha. I just don't think he would stick his neck out there and risk being wrong with a situation like this that is all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Love the pick for the Colts. I am biased being a Stanford Cardinal fan. And Ty going in the 3rd... I am very pleased.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Half of Werner's "splash" plays came against BAD teams...      But everyone liked his "motor" ...    It's not over for him...  just out of position.

 

Let's be honest. We have no clue until they actually play.
I thought Werner was going to be a monster.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmm.... Weaknesses

Slender legs, tight hips and boring feet. Feet will stall at contact when squared up against the run. Initial punch by an offensive lineman will jostle him. Lacks power to play inside. On the ground far too often. Must improve hand usage as pass rusher. Can be blocked by tight ends. Benefited from team-oriented defensive scheme. Doesn't gain much ground with initial steps as pass rusher. Relies on hustle sacks and lacks counter moves.

 

 

*production

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmm.... Weaknesses

Slender legs, tight hips and boring feet. Feet will stall at contact when squared up against the run. Initial punch by an offensive lineman will jostle him. Lacks power to play inside. On the ground far too often. Must improve hand usage as pass rusher. Can be blocked by tight ends. Benefited from team-oriented defensive scheme. Doesn't gain much ground with initial steps as pass rusher. Relies on hustle sacks and lacks counter moves.

Yes. Those are some troubling negatives aren't they? The kind that seem difficult to overcome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They play physical football..    .....  I likey.. 

 

Instant starter.

 

Stanford guys are being drafted big time in rounds 2 and 3, it seems like

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they could somehow come away with Grady J, Clemmings, or Dawson tommorrow  I will be really liking this ...

 

I thought we'd be taking a RB in the 4th....

 

Now I think we'll be taking a safety and a RB in the 5th...

 

That's just my hunch....   But wouldn't Clemmings be nice in the 4th?!?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright my bad for not realizing. I am not defending Miles one way or another I don't know much about him and/or if he eats grass haha. I just don't think he would stick his neck out there and risk being wrong with a situation like this that is all.

 

He's well-known for being a little. . . off-the-wall.  Crazy like a fox.  And yes, he likes to graze a bit during games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Half of Werner's "splash" plays came against BAD teams...      But everyone liked his "motor" ...    It's not over for him...  just out of position.

You mean splash play

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Those are some troubling negatives aren't they? The kind that seem difficult to overcome.

 

Seems like it, states even if he bulks up he still may not be very adequate at a pro level from the sounds of the NFL draft analysis.  Still it waits to be seen.

 

Mayock and other seemed to like the pick though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Several good players left in the morning and we don't have too wait long!  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Those are some troubling negatives aren't they? The kind that seem difficult to overcome.

Not sure if you are being sarcastic.....

 

Sources Tell Us "He plays hard like Trent Murphy did at Stanford, but Murphy was a better athlete. He's not explosive enough to be a reliable pass rusher and I don't see him as a run stuffer." -- Pac 12 regional scout

 

Bottom Line

Data driven teams will be intrigued by Anderson's stuffs, impact tackles and total pressures, but the tape doesn't validate his potential to produce these numbers on the pro level. The body type screams 3-4 defensive end if he can bulk up and add power, but he might lack the balance and toughness to make it there. Anderson might just be a "tweener" without a clear NFL position fit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's well-known for being a little. . . off-the-wall.  Crazy like a fox.  And yes, he likes to graze a bit during games.

Sounds like Les Miles and Steve Spurrier must be related somehow then haha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was hoping he'd still be there tomorrow.  Oh well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you are being sarcastic.....

Sources Tell Us "He plays hard like Trent Murphy did at Stanford, but Murphy was a better athlete. He's not explosive enough to be a reliable pass rusher and I don't see him as a run stuffer." -- Pac 12 regional scout

Bottom Line

Data driven teams will be intrigued by Anderson's stuffs, impact tackles and total pressures, but the tape doesn't validate his potential to produce these numbers on the pro level. The body type screams 3-4 defensive end if he can bulk up and add power, but he might lack the balance and toughness to make it there. Anderson might just be a "tweener" without a clear NFL position fit.

That's a less than stellar review.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3?

 

Oh really, that's it ? haha it just seemed like we had plenty of stanford players

 

luck

fleener

howell

whalen

anderson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Those are some troubling negatives aren't they? The kind that seem difficult to overcome.

They also said JJ Watt would slide inside "on occasion" to rush the passer. Old scouting reports are fun to read.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you are being sarcastic.....

 

Sources Tell Us "He plays hard like Trent Murphy did at Stanford, but Murphy was a better athlete. He's not explosive enough to be a reliable pass rusher and I don't see him as a run stuffer." -- Pac 12 regional scout

 

Bottom Line

Data driven teams will be intrigued by Anderson's stuffs, impact tackles and total pressures, but the tape doesn't validate his potential to produce these numbers on the pro level. The body type screams 3-4 defensive end if he can bulk up and add power, but he might lack the balance and toughness to make it there. Anderson might just be a "tweener" without a clear NFL position fit.

It sounds like he is not athletic and has a narrow base. Not the kind of body type I prefer for the Dline.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was talking about college tape genius...    

 

OK...      Oh and compare BjW's stats against all "pass rushers" taken that season... 

 

JUST saying....  First round picks are far from guarantees of success.     FAR FROM IT.

You mean splash play

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh really, that's it ? haha it just seemed like we had plenty of stanford players

 

luck

fleener

howell

whalen

anderson

I have a better shot to make the team than Whalen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was talking about college tape genius...    

 

OK...      Oh and compare BjW's stats against all "pass rushers" taken that season... 

 

JUST saying....  First round picks are far from guarantees of success.     FAR FROM IT.

So he's the best of crappy group? Good argument genius

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We are talking about C Carter's kid now....     he is NO guarantee..      1st pick was a stone cold wake up call to him. 

 

Griff will show up and out work him ....  can he out play him?    I hope so..      Carter's just an entitled name ...  thus the Dorsett pick.

GW will probably be the odd man out

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is what it is...  

 

I can only lead a mule to water...          you know the rest..   :thmup:

 

So he's the best of crappy group? Good argument genius

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Backing off the ledge now.

Hahaha I feel the same way. I want to hate Grigson but this draft is shaping up nicely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Instant starter.

 

Stanford guys are being drafted big time in rounds 2 and 3, it seems like

starter? over who?

 

i cant see team benching arthur jones or langford.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

please TJ CLemmings...

 

or draft Michael Bennett and trade him to the Seahawks for Michael Bennett.

draft Malcolm Brown, trade him to the Patriots for Malcom Brown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • they have three top 10 picks on their d line, how are we supposed to follow that model?   we spent our high picks on the oline to protect luck and we still need offense now.  
    • we might have to trade up, we wont be picking in the top 3 next year or any time soon. we have to take a chance on someone who is not a top tier prospect, might as well do it now it could take time to develop them.   its not anyone but jacoby either, any of the first round prospects this year could be good if they go to the right place
    • Jordan Love day 1 analysis according to Tony Pauline:   "Love did not have quite the day of Justin Herbert but he wasn’t far behind. He made several magnificent passes throughout the day and drew a lot of praise from the scouts around me.  He has a super quick, super-efficient release, a live arm and showed some beautiful pass placement. There were a couple of passes that got away from him and he was not quite as effective on the move compared to Herbert, but it was an “A” day for Love."   For Contrast, this is what Pauline had to say about Herbert:   "Herbert looked phenomenal on Tuesday displaying all the physical tools and leadership skills necessary for the next level.  He was right on the money with many of his throws and his pass placement was off the charts.  He made plays in and out of the pocket, displayed a next level arm and great athleticism.  His incomplete passes were more about drops by receivers rather than missed throws on his part.  And when his receivers dropped a pass Herbert was there to take charge.  Terrific day by the Oregon quarterback."   So from the sounds of it, they both had a really good day, which, as someone who would want to draft either one, scares me a little
    • I agree, but not so enthusiastically! 
    • Never said I specifically had to have one of those two. I'm team Kinlaw for now. But more importantly, I'm not the one drafting. This thread is about IF Ballard and Reich want one of these guys, but had to trade up to get them, what would be the cost, who would be the trade partner, and for fans who want one of those two, what would they be okay with.
  • Members

    • aaron11

      aaron11 2,500

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BProland85

      BProland85 2,543

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dacoltsboi

      Dacoltsboi 24

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsBlueFL

      ColtsBlueFL 6,060

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • funktacious2

      funktacious2 598

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dodsworth

      dodsworth 1,097

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kc77

      Kc77 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Tombstone

      Tombstone 111

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • newb767

      newb767 27

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 6,821

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...