Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 879
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I agree he "should" come in and be an impact player....     Who does he have to beat?  

 

Finally DL and a nice pick....      Go Colts

 

Instant starter.

 

Stanford guys are being drafted big time in rounds 2 and 3, it seems like

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just kidding, Miles is a good dude.

Alright my bad for not realizing. I am not defending Miles one way or another I don't know much about him and/or if he eats grass haha. I just don't think he would stick his neck out there and risk being wrong with a situation like this that is all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Half of Werner's "splash" plays came against BAD teams...      But everyone liked his "motor" ...    It's not over for him...  just out of position.

 

Let's be honest. We have no clue until they actually play.
I thought Werner was going to be a monster.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmm.... Weaknesses

Slender legs, tight hips and boring feet. Feet will stall at contact when squared up against the run. Initial punch by an offensive lineman will jostle him. Lacks power to play inside. On the ground far too often. Must improve hand usage as pass rusher. Can be blocked by tight ends. Benefited from team-oriented defensive scheme. Doesn't gain much ground with initial steps as pass rusher. Relies on hustle sacks and lacks counter moves.

 

 

*production

Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmm.... Weaknesses

Slender legs, tight hips and boring feet. Feet will stall at contact when squared up against the run. Initial punch by an offensive lineman will jostle him. Lacks power to play inside. On the ground far too often. Must improve hand usage as pass rusher. Can be blocked by tight ends. Benefited from team-oriented defensive scheme. Doesn't gain much ground with initial steps as pass rusher. Relies on hustle sacks and lacks counter moves.

Yes. Those are some troubling negatives aren't they? The kind that seem difficult to overcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they could somehow come away with Grady J, Clemmings, or Dawson tommorrow  I will be really liking this ...

 

I thought we'd be taking a RB in the 4th....

 

Now I think we'll be taking a safety and a RB in the 5th...

 

That's just my hunch....   But wouldn't Clemmings be nice in the 4th?!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright my bad for not realizing. I am not defending Miles one way or another I don't know much about him and/or if he eats grass haha. I just don't think he would stick his neck out there and risk being wrong with a situation like this that is all.

 

He's well-known for being a little. . . off-the-wall.  Crazy like a fox.  And yes, he likes to graze a bit during games.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Half of Werner's "splash" plays came against BAD teams...      But everyone liked his "motor" ...    It's not over for him...  just out of position.

You mean splash play

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Those are some troubling negatives aren't they? The kind that seem difficult to overcome.

 

Seems like it, states even if he bulks up he still may not be very adequate at a pro level from the sounds of the NFL draft analysis.  Still it waits to be seen.

 

Mayock and other seemed to like the pick though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Those are some troubling negatives aren't they? The kind that seem difficult to overcome.

Not sure if you are being sarcastic.....

 

Sources Tell Us "He plays hard like Trent Murphy did at Stanford, but Murphy was a better athlete. He's not explosive enough to be a reliable pass rusher and I don't see him as a run stuffer." -- Pac 12 regional scout

 

Bottom Line

Data driven teams will be intrigued by Anderson's stuffs, impact tackles and total pressures, but the tape doesn't validate his potential to produce these numbers on the pro level. The body type screams 3-4 defensive end if he can bulk up and add power, but he might lack the balance and toughness to make it there. Anderson might just be a "tweener" without a clear NFL position fit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you are being sarcastic.....

Sources Tell Us "He plays hard like Trent Murphy did at Stanford, but Murphy was a better athlete. He's not explosive enough to be a reliable pass rusher and I don't see him as a run stuffer." -- Pac 12 regional scout

Bottom Line

Data driven teams will be intrigued by Anderson's stuffs, impact tackles and total pressures, but the tape doesn't validate his potential to produce these numbers on the pro level. The body type screams 3-4 defensive end if he can bulk up and add power, but he might lack the balance and toughness to make it there. Anderson might just be a "tweener" without a clear NFL position fit.

That's a less than stellar review.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Those are some troubling negatives aren't they? The kind that seem difficult to overcome.

They also said JJ Watt would slide inside "on occasion" to rush the passer. Old scouting reports are fun to read.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you are being sarcastic.....

 

Sources Tell Us "He plays hard like Trent Murphy did at Stanford, but Murphy was a better athlete. He's not explosive enough to be a reliable pass rusher and I don't see him as a run stuffer." -- Pac 12 regional scout

 

Bottom Line

Data driven teams will be intrigued by Anderson's stuffs, impact tackles and total pressures, but the tape doesn't validate his potential to produce these numbers on the pro level. The body type screams 3-4 defensive end if he can bulk up and add power, but he might lack the balance and toughness to make it there. Anderson might just be a "tweener" without a clear NFL position fit.

It sounds like he is not athletic and has a narrow base. Not the kind of body type I prefer for the Dline.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was talking about college tape genius...    

 

OK...      Oh and compare BjW's stats against all "pass rushers" taken that season... 

 

JUST saying....  First round picks are far from guarantees of success.     FAR FROM IT.

You mean splash play

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh really, that's it ? haha it just seemed like we had plenty of stanford players

 

luck

fleener

howell

whalen

anderson

I have a better shot to make the team than Whalen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was talking about college tape genius...    

 

OK...      Oh and compare BjW's stats against all "pass rushers" taken that season... 

 

JUST saying....  First round picks are far from guarantees of success.     FAR FROM IT.

So he's the best of crappy group? Good argument genius

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are talking about C Carter's kid now....     he is NO guarantee..      1st pick was a stone cold wake up call to him. 

 

Griff will show up and out work him ....  can he out play him?    I hope so..      Carter's just an entitled name ...  thus the Dorsett pick.

GW will probably be the odd man out

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...