Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

bap1331

Your take on position needs...

Recommended Posts

In my opinion, putting pressure on brady is most important. You can score all you want but brady will just keep coming back at it.

Ot is not 1st round worthy. The problem with the staff is there was a different oline variation EVERY week. They need to keep consistency because come playoff time, they did a great job with the run and pass once they kept a stable line and when they benched harrison.

Im thinking dt to plug up the run and pressure the qb was a weakness. We do need werner to step up this year too. A good dt will open up the lb pressure. I remember seeing tape on how the oline was so worried about suh that they forgot to cover the lb coming on the side.

Safety at 2nd round, de or lb at 3rd, ol, cb, and lb depth at 5th, 6th, 7th.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In order:

 

S, RT, ILB, CB, NT, RB

 

I don't think about this year when drafting most of the time.  This is what I see as projected needs both now, and 1-2 years from now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It saddens me to see Tom Brady and the Pats in the heads of so many Colts fans. 

we've seen some stuff man and some things...the war was hard on all of us

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion, putting pressure on brady is most important. You can score all you want but brady will just keep coming back at it.

Ot is not 1st round worthy. The problem with the staff is there was a different oline variation EVERY week. They need to keep consistency because come playoff time, they did a great job with the run and pass once they kept a stable line and when they benched harrison.

Im thinking dt to plug up the run and pressure the qb was a weakness. We do need werner to step up this year too. A good dt will open up the lb pressure. I remember seeing tape on how the oline was so worried about suh that they forgot to cover the lb coming on the side.

Safety at 2nd round, de or lb at 3rd, ol, cb, and lb depth at 5th, 6th, 7th.

 

So it looks like you would rather just reach for someone with less skill than to take someone to protect the future, is that correct?  I agree that we need to try and stick with the same 5 guys on the line and that the lack of continuity led to some of the issues that they had, however, Gosder Cherilus has what appears to be an ongoing (degenerating?) knee injury and we have no idea if he will be able to make it all the way through the season.  On top of that, we also can save quite a bit of money next year (prior to 2016-17 season) by cutting him.  I am not saying that we should necessarily spend a first on a OT, however, you cannot completely count it out.  There is value in a RT, and by drafting one early this year (assume we draft one in the 1st), we can; a.) have a nice backup in place for worse case scenario and/or b.) have a succession plan that would allow us to save money the following year by cutting him, increasing our $ to re-sign our FA's.

 

Also, assingning positions to a certain round seems silly, that is not how you want to draft.  Could it work out to where you got some good players, sure, but it is also about value...you want to get the most value out of your picks, not just settle for someone who fits a perceived need.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It saddens me to see Tom Brady and the Pats in the heads of so many Colts fans. 

 

Sometimes I have to check to make sure I am in the right forum as much pro-patriot talk/appreciation/fear as there is here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if we didnt draft S or DL early. I would except strictly BPA. Mocks are overrated for this reason.

But to answer the question: DL, S, RT, ILB, C, OG, OLB, RB, CB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think DLine and Safety are at the top of the needs. And those are the choices I think we are looking at with the first round pick.

Forget TEs, the Colts defense in the middle of the field in general is terrible. We desperately need a middle of the field enforcer to not only help in the run game but cover TEs and patrol the middle of the field. Also a FS because Adams is on a 2 year deal in his 30s.

We have mediocre LBs, but that problem would be somewhat alleviated with better NT play. A got who could control the line of scrimmage would open up a lot of possibilities for the Colts defensively.

Those 2 positions could change the Colts defense dramatically

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes I have to check to make sure I am in the right forum as much pro-patriot talk/appreciation/fear as there is here.

 

They've been beating the brakes off of us lately, so I get it. I just hope people understand that the Patriots aren't guaranteed anything either. The Colts need to improve their operation without regard for the Pats. Just do whatever you can at every stop to get better. Individual matchups will take care of themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They've been beating the brakes off of us lately, so I get it. I just hope people understand that the Patriots aren't guaranteed anything either. The Colts need to improve their operation without regard for the Pats. Just do whatever you can at every stop to get better. Individual matchups will take care of themselves.

 

Agree 100%

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not fear against the patriots. Colts pretty much beat everyone already except the steelers and patriots. Were not going going to the super bowl unless we pass the pats...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really folks, with all of the talk about the trenches.....right now......the secondary stinks.  We have three compentent CBs and 1 competent S, and he is 34 years old.

 

Last year, the Colts suffered from a poor pass rush, no offensive threat beyond TY, and a jumbled O line.

 

Since last year:

 

The colts signed Langford and Cole to shore up the front 7.  The Colts signed AJ, Gore, but neither are really a TD threat without the O clicking off a long drive.  Herremans was signed to help address the immediate concerns on the Oline.

 

The needs:

 

S, CB, TD threat (a WR or RB, I don't care), Depth on the DL, Depth at ILB, and Depth at OLB (not just an EDGE player)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Biggest need is O-line. Can you imagine what we'd look like if Castonzo went down? Protecting Luck and having a strong ground game will put this offense in greatest show on turf territory in terms of domination. Probably even better.

We definitely also need help at safety and could use some talent on the D-line. Cornerback depth or a long term answer is something we should be looking for too. Oh, and a running back would be nice, but I think we could find one late.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there anyone that thinks Danny Shelton will still be on the board? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not happy with our ILBs.

This has been a weak area in our defense as long as I can remember. Hopefully we can find a quality LB in this draft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Probably one of the worst signings in Colts history.
    • Really like TY really need to talk how many yards he has right now...less then 600 wow.
    • I feel the same.     Bill explains- “I heard about this, and evidently this is our production people on the TV show that were there,” Belichick said, via Pats Pulpit. “I have absolutely nothing to do — we have absolutely nothing to do with anything that they produce, direct, shoot or anything. I’ve never even seen any of their tapes or anything else. So this is something that we 100 percent have zero involvement with. This is something that you would have to talk to the production people about and what they were doing and whatever it was.”   A team really doesn't need a special production video team to record the upcoming opponents sidelines/coaches.  Think about it, someone placed in the stands with an advanced smartphone with tons of memory can take HQ video from the stands wearing normal non team oriented clothing.  They can later synch it up to scouts notes (who was calling plays, how their arm, hands were vs. what was run, down/distance, etc) to see if some gestures tip certain plays... etc. They also have access after a game to All 22 coaches film, to synch the hand written notes up to.     Advance scouts scout every team. They also get the 'scout team' prepped to emulate the upcoming opponents formations/p\lays.     That's a fine.  Big one. They should just hire a college kid with an huge smartphone to film for them...  ooops!  ;)   Every team has advance scouts doing extensive note taking on upcoming opponents, and All 22 video to correlate. OTOH, rules were broken...
    • I actually haven't been to any of those ones except Fenway which I found great with atmosphere and just how it felt walking around the ballpark and way they had it set up
    • Long story short, the Colts didn't tank and were a busted run against the Jags from not getting Luck. It doesn't really matter anymore and it arguably never really did, but damn it, I find the "Colts tanked for Luck" narrative annoying. I watched those games that year for some reason. Kerry Collins was washed up. Curtis Painter got an honest shot that might have gone a game or two longer than it should have, but it is what it is and Dan Orlovsky was like a glass of water after Painter. If you're tanking, you play Painter. Anyway, whatever. I should let this one go..
  • Members

    • IndyEric07

      IndyEric07 10

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MTC

      MTC 6,204

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • el duderino

      el duderino 63

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • buccolts

      buccolts 3,763

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsBlueFL

      ColtsBlueFL 5,980

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mississippi

      Mississippi 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyJoe

      IndyJoe 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ojsglove

      ojsglove 196

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NannyMcafee

      NannyMcafee 1,448

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • esmort

      esmort 1,597

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...