Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

bap1331

Your take on position needs...

Recommended Posts

In my opinion, putting pressure on brady is most important. You can score all you want but brady will just keep coming back at it.

Ot is not 1st round worthy. The problem with the staff is there was a different oline variation EVERY week. They need to keep consistency because come playoff time, they did a great job with the run and pass once they kept a stable line and when they benched harrison.

Im thinking dt to plug up the run and pressure the qb was a weakness. We do need werner to step up this year too. A good dt will open up the lb pressure. I remember seeing tape on how the oline was so worried about suh that they forgot to cover the lb coming on the side.

Safety at 2nd round, de or lb at 3rd, ol, cb, and lb depth at 5th, 6th, 7th.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In order:

 

S, RT, ILB, CB, NT, RB

 

I don't think about this year when drafting most of the time.  This is what I see as projected needs both now, and 1-2 years from now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It saddens me to see Tom Brady and the Pats in the heads of so many Colts fans. 

we've seen some stuff man and some things...the war was hard on all of us

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion, putting pressure on brady is most important. You can score all you want but brady will just keep coming back at it.

Ot is not 1st round worthy. The problem with the staff is there was a different oline variation EVERY week. They need to keep consistency because come playoff time, they did a great job with the run and pass once they kept a stable line and when they benched harrison.

Im thinking dt to plug up the run and pressure the qb was a weakness. We do need werner to step up this year too. A good dt will open up the lb pressure. I remember seeing tape on how the oline was so worried about suh that they forgot to cover the lb coming on the side.

Safety at 2nd round, de or lb at 3rd, ol, cb, and lb depth at 5th, 6th, 7th.

 

So it looks like you would rather just reach for someone with less skill than to take someone to protect the future, is that correct?  I agree that we need to try and stick with the same 5 guys on the line and that the lack of continuity led to some of the issues that they had, however, Gosder Cherilus has what appears to be an ongoing (degenerating?) knee injury and we have no idea if he will be able to make it all the way through the season.  On top of that, we also can save quite a bit of money next year (prior to 2016-17 season) by cutting him.  I am not saying that we should necessarily spend a first on a OT, however, you cannot completely count it out.  There is value in a RT, and by drafting one early this year (assume we draft one in the 1st), we can; a.) have a nice backup in place for worse case scenario and/or b.) have a succession plan that would allow us to save money the following year by cutting him, increasing our $ to re-sign our FA's.

 

Also, assingning positions to a certain round seems silly, that is not how you want to draft.  Could it work out to where you got some good players, sure, but it is also about value...you want to get the most value out of your picks, not just settle for someone who fits a perceived need.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It saddens me to see Tom Brady and the Pats in the heads of so many Colts fans. 

 

Sometimes I have to check to make sure I am in the right forum as much pro-patriot talk/appreciation/fear as there is here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if we didnt draft S or DL early. I would except strictly BPA. Mocks are overrated for this reason.

But to answer the question: DL, S, RT, ILB, C, OG, OLB, RB, CB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think DLine and Safety are at the top of the needs. And those are the choices I think we are looking at with the first round pick.

Forget TEs, the Colts defense in the middle of the field in general is terrible. We desperately need a middle of the field enforcer to not only help in the run game but cover TEs and patrol the middle of the field. Also a FS because Adams is on a 2 year deal in his 30s.

We have mediocre LBs, but that problem would be somewhat alleviated with better NT play. A got who could control the line of scrimmage would open up a lot of possibilities for the Colts defensively.

Those 2 positions could change the Colts defense dramatically

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes I have to check to make sure I am in the right forum as much pro-patriot talk/appreciation/fear as there is here.

 

They've been beating the brakes off of us lately, so I get it. I just hope people understand that the Patriots aren't guaranteed anything either. The Colts need to improve their operation without regard for the Pats. Just do whatever you can at every stop to get better. Individual matchups will take care of themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They've been beating the brakes off of us lately, so I get it. I just hope people understand that the Patriots aren't guaranteed anything either. The Colts need to improve their operation without regard for the Pats. Just do whatever you can at every stop to get better. Individual matchups will take care of themselves.

 

Agree 100%

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not fear against the patriots. Colts pretty much beat everyone already except the steelers and patriots. Were not going going to the super bowl unless we pass the pats...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really folks, with all of the talk about the trenches.....right now......the secondary stinks.  We have three compentent CBs and 1 competent S, and he is 34 years old.

 

Last year, the Colts suffered from a poor pass rush, no offensive threat beyond TY, and a jumbled O line.

 

Since last year:

 

The colts signed Langford and Cole to shore up the front 7.  The Colts signed AJ, Gore, but neither are really a TD threat without the O clicking off a long drive.  Herremans was signed to help address the immediate concerns on the Oline.

 

The needs:

 

S, CB, TD threat (a WR or RB, I don't care), Depth on the DL, Depth at ILB, and Depth at OLB (not just an EDGE player)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Biggest need is O-line. Can you imagine what we'd look like if Castonzo went down? Protecting Luck and having a strong ground game will put this offense in greatest show on turf territory in terms of domination. Probably even better.

We definitely also need help at safety and could use some talent on the D-line. Cornerback depth or a long term answer is something we should be looking for too. Oh, and a running back would be nice, but I think we could find one late.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there anyone that thinks Danny Shelton will still be on the board? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not happy with our ILBs.

This has been a weak area in our defense as long as I can remember. Hopefully we can find a quality LB in this draft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Steelers are playing with their 2nd stringer also...
    • There is also two other WRs at the bottom of the screen coming open on that same play. Smh. Options everywhere
    • I hope you’ll be proven right.  I fear you won’t.   I will say that teams like JAX and TEN had more invested in their high first-round picks Bortles and Mariota than the Colts do in JB, who we traded for in a moment of immediate need.   That said, it just seems more common in the league to wait too long based on a belief that a player’s full potential is high and just around the corner.
    • they are in the playoff hunt, but not many people think they will win a super bowl.  most of the top teams have really good QBs
    • What I'm getting at, though, is that regardless of his circumstances, it's possible to evaluate a QB on the basis of his performance, abilities, traits, and perceived potential to improve. That's my viewpoint.   Of course, the rougher the circumstances and the greater the number of variables, the more complicated the evaluation becomes. But while the receivers haven't been great, we can still look at JB and see what he does well and what he doesn't do well, we can reach reasonable conclusions about why he excels or struggles in certain areas, and we can project whether he can reasonably improve and become a player worthy of an investment of time and money, and worthy of building around. Sure, it's somewhat complicated, but it's not all that difficult, IMO.   What the Colts do at QB in the offseason will depend, to a large degree, on their evaluation of JB. I am confident that they will not say 'well, JB had a rough set of circumstances, let's wait and see what he does next year.' If they strongly feel that he's good enough to build around, that will affect how seriously they pursue other options at the position. But if they aren't sold on him, I don't think they'll just say 'let's give him another year, let's give him another year.' 
  • Members

    • twfish

      twfish 1,711

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 2,496

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoColts8818

      GoColts8818 9,297

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bsteves

      bsteves 152

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • J@son

      J@son 7,312

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoColts00

      GoColts00 380

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • strt182

      strt182 330

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coffeedrinker

      Coffeedrinker 7,095

      Senior Members
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MPStack

      MPStack 2,930

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dodsworth

      dodsworth 1,067

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...