Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Breakdown of Northwestern S Ibraheim Campbell

Recommended Posts



Size: 5'11" 210 lbs. Prototypical size. Would prefer him to be just a liiiitle bit bigger (6'0" 215 lbs) as his skill set lends him more to an ITB role. Solid build. Ridiculous hand size (10 1/4"). (4/5)


Athleticism: No combine or pro-day numbers to look at here. Closes on the ball-carrier quickly. Sideline to sideline speed is a big question mark. Change of direction and lateral agility are ok. Good burst. (6/10)


Coverage and Fluidity: Not a natural mover in coverage. Stiff dropping back and has questionable at best range. Not a great option as a single-high or deep zone player. He actually does well in short-zone coverage. Good awareness and play recognition combined with burst make him a solid option covering TEs in man and zone coverage. I'm not going to go so far as to say that he's bad in coverage, but it's definitely a weakness and something that may take a few years to round out in the pros. He's no Earl Thomas in coverage, but he's no Dwight Lowery either. (5/10)


Physicality and ITB ability: Campbell possesses typical ITB skill-set. He's a powerful hitter who reads run plays well. He's a sure tackler. When you're in his grasp, a lot more often than not you're going to the ground. Show an ability to close in on and explode through the ball-carrier. Strong player. Would be a pretty good option as a nickel-lb as well (assuming he puts on a little more weight). Strong enough to take on and shed blocks. Good feel for angles. Doesn't throw himself off balance. Makes a ton of plays in the run game. (8/10)


Technical Ability: I'd say that Campbell is just as good a tackler as Landon Collins. He wraps-up and keep his balance. Good angles as well. Coverage is another thing. Stiff. Doesn't do a good job mirroring or playing the WRS hands. Can get beat with double-moves and head-fakes and is prone to biting on play fakes. (5/10)


Ball Skills: 2 INTs in the game I watched. Shows decent hands, and does a good job tracking the ball with his eyes. Both were the result of obvious terrible throws, but it's nice to see he has some ability to haul inerrant throws. Not going to rack up INTs or PDs. (3/5)


Consistency: Consistent tackler. Constantly around the ball making tackles in the box. Needs work on his reaction ability (if that's even possible) in pass coverage, but you couldn't ask for a more consistent player in the box. (3/5)




Stops a runner in his tracks/FF: http://zippy.gfycat.com/PeskyBitesizedChital.webm


Sliding INT: http://zippy.gfycat.com/FixedKindlyArmyant.webm


Keeps balance and makes tackle: http://zippy.gfycat.com/ImpossibleFlamboyantIndianrhinoceros.webm


Powerful tackles+good angle: http://zippy.gfycat.com/ElatedPowerlessAlaskanmalamute.webm


Breaks on the ball: http://zippy.gfycat.com/GoodFewHarrierhawk.webm




Grade: 34 out of 55.  A low 2nd-round grade


Campbell is very much "Landon Collins-lite". Any team that misses out of Collins in the first could grab a very similar player in Campbell in the 2nd or 3rd round. 


Campbell has the ability to be a great ITB safety with ability to cover and potentially take away TEs. He's not going to flourish in a scheme that asks him to take on a lot of cover responsibilities, but as an 8th defender/nickel-LB? He'll be very good.


NFL Comparison: Deone Bucannon, ARZ 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow.  His stock has really shot up.  I remember doing a mock draft and reading scouting reports about a month ago and he wasn't even drafted/projected to be drafted.  Now, he's being talked about going in the first three rounds....which is a huge bummer because I was hoping the Colts would sign him.

Link to post
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How Rivers did week 1 is irrelevant?    Are you certifiable?    You've been complaining about it ever since.    Throwing 46 times wasn't the game plan.   But you didn't seem to notice that against that terrible run defense we couldn't manage to gain 90 yards.   And we threw for nearly 400.    So you demonstrate your lack of understanding of football.   The game plan wasn't working,  so we went with what WAS WORKING.    The passing game.   And we backed off the running game.     And by the way,  one of the reasons why the running game wasn't working was the lack of the pre-season.     But, that's just you being you!    LOL!!  
    • Really?  That's the best you got?   A childish insult that sounds like it came from a 12 year old?   That's the best you got?   In my more than 8 years here, I've never met someone more afraid of writing words than you.   They're like your kryptonite.   And stop trying to be the school-yard bully telling me what to do and not to do.   That's not going to work either.   Your such a coward running as far away from any fight you think you can't win.   Not changing anything?    That's what you do to any topic that you can't win.   Happens all the time.   Which is why I write about it all the time.    This is not new territory.   So, the next time you want to insult me,  do yourself a favor,  use one of your Life Lines!   Try the Phone-a-Friend feature and ask someone else for a better insult than "wise old lady".    If that's the best you got,  well,  It's just pitiful.   Good Luck.  
    • you misinterpreted his comment. Try reading it again
    • He's an interesting one. Something has to be up with him. Started to emerge last year, then phtttt Blazing fast kid.
  • Members

    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,702

      Senior Member
      Last active:
    • SteelCityColt

      SteelCityColt 8,994

      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 3,076

      Senior Member
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 582

      Last active:
    • bestQBever

      bestQBever 1,160

      Senior Member
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 2,892

      Senior Member
      Last active:
  • Create New...