Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

With the 29th Pick of the 2015 NFL Draft: The Indianapolis Colts Select ...


Recommended Posts

A dominant young NT should be first priority.  I expect Leonard Williams, Danny Shelton, and Malcolm Brown to be gone by the time the Colts pick.  If any of those three DTs should fall to pick 29, it's a no-brainer.  Once those three are off the board, Grigson should select one of the remaining top-caliber D-Linemen:  Arik Armstead, Eddie Goldman, or Jordan Phillips.  Given a choice of these three, I'd pick Eddie Goldman first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing wrong with that, gore wont be around long and gordon/ gurley may well be BPA.

 

that said i would say

 

Dline, any position

safety

Oline

 

Melvin Gordon in the 1st round would be a huge mistake.  Any RB in the 1st would be a mistake, and regardless of the hype I am not even sure I think Gordon is the 2nd best RB in this draft class.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Malcom Brown or Eddie Goldman and then trade up into the early second to grab Kendricks if he's there. I can dream. I really like Kendricks but I also want us to get a DT and I feel like there's a drop off at DT after the first round.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Melvin Gordon in the 1st round would be a huge mistake.  Any RB in the 1st would be a mistake,

we will have to disagree on that.  if the board falls a certain way gurley or gordon could be a good pick.  hopefully we can get one of the best Dline players at the point imo, but i wouldnt rule out RB, in fact i think we should consider it

Link to post
Share on other sites

we will have to disagree on that.  if the board falls a certain way gurley or gordon could be a good pick.  hopefully we can get one of the best Dline players at the point imo, but i wouldnt rule out RB, in fact i think we should consider it

 

Just like many others here I have looked at tons of mock drafts and have yet to see one where the best option for the Colts is taking a RB at #29. We have enough other needs that there will be an equivalently good player at a position of greater need available when we pick, even trading back is a better option. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whit the 29th pick in the 2015 nfl draft: the Indianapolis Colts select Melvin Gordon university of Wiscon BOOYAAAH!!!

While I appreciate the Big 10 support Stone, the Badgers aren't exactly known for creating game changing backs that transition well at the next level. Gordon isn't associated with blocking very well & I would need to see him perform blitz pick up against NFL LBs & premier pass rushers before I even think about drafting him. My answer right now on Melvin: No way in hades. 

 

Besides with Ballard, Boom Herron, & Gore in our current rotation, INDY's sitting pretty good at that spot anyway IMO. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No way a rb in the first round is a mistake. I prefer Coleman in the 2nd if he falls that far but Gordon/Gurley not a bad choice. It is a position of need for us.

 

 

not really.  sure it would be nice to have a stronger #2 back and someone to replace Gore in 2-3 years, but it's not even close to a first round "need".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Melvin Gordon in the 1st round would be a huge mistake.  Any RB in the 1st would be a mistake, and regardless of the hype I am not even sure I think Gordon is the 2nd best RB in this draft class.

Well said esmort. As a general rule of thumb, avoid WI completely when it comes to drafting RB's. Our school is good at drafting decent TE's, DE's, & O-lineman on average. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well said esmort. As a general rule of thumb, avoid WI completely when it comes to drafting RB's. Our school is good at drafting decent TE's, DE's, & O-lineman on average. 

 

I agree, the OL he ran behind was awesome and they also opened up some holes for him to make a lot of crazy long runs, he is never going to get that many of those type long runs in the NFL ... he will occasionally break off a long run in the NFL, but nothing like the crazy number he had in college.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just like many others here I have looked at tons of mock drafts and have yet to see one where the best option for the Colts is taking a RB at #29. We have enough other needs that there will be an equivalently good player at a position of greater need available when we pick, even trading back is a better option.

What position is a greater need? There might be a couple but if we can get the best RB in the draft at 29 then that would be pretty good value and fill a need.

I like that better than taking 4th or 5th line man on either side

Link to post
Share on other sites

What position is a greater need? There might be a couple but if we can get the best RB in the draft at 29 then that would be pretty good value and fill a need.

I like that better than taking 4th or 5th line man on either side

Every position other than QB, P, K. and TE ... and I might even grab a stud TE if there was one available (in a draft class that wasn't devoid of TE talent). RB is not a 1st round position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure it is. Im ok with having an unpopular opinion on this though. Ideally id like to see a great defender fall to us though

If we want to continue to have a lights-out offense and a completely mediocre defense that eventually caves in in the postseason, then sure go RB 1st round

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure it is. Im ok with having an unpopular opinion on this though. Ideally id like to see a great defender fall to us though

 

Plenty of people share your opinion.  I just happen to believe that in all but the rarest of circumstances RB a team shouldn't use a 1st rnd pick on a RB.  The fact that we can use almost any position that happens to fall to us (OL,DL, and pretty much every other position on the defense) makes spending a 1st on a RB a luxury we can't afford, especially in a deep RB class when we can easily get good RBs in the 3rd & 4th and most likely even later.

 

RBs are often replaceable with a back up, practice squad player, or even a FA often without significant drop off, it's one of the only positions that that you can pick up a guy off the street mid-season and still have a legitimate chance of getting decent to high performance from the position.

 

Would I like to have Gurley? ... Heck Yeah ... Do I think he is worth a 1st? ... Nope 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Plenty of people share your opinion.  I just happen to believe that in all but the rarest of circumstances RB a team shouldn't use a 1st rnd pick on a RB.  The fact that we can use almost any position that happens to fall to us (OL,DL, and pretty much every other position on the defense) makes spending a 1st on a RB a luxury we can't afford, especially in a deep RB class when we can easily get good RBs in the 3rd & 4th and most likely even later.

 

RBs are often replaceable with a back up, practice squad player, or even a FA often without significant drop off, it's one of the only positions that that you can pick up a guy off the street mid-season and still have a legitimate chance of getting decent to high performance from the position.

 

Would I like to have Gurley? ... Heck Yeah ... Do I think he is worth a 1st? ... Nope 

 

I think your post is perfectly reasonable and fair....

 

But I'd like to add this....   (and it's not directed at you)

 

If Gurley or Gordon are there when we pick and we pass....   and either one turns into something great...   there will be a number of posters here who will go crazy on Grigson.    Won't matter that they've said we shouldn't use a 1st on a RB,  they'll flip-flop, and say we should've grabbed the guy,  and we passed and now he's great and Grigson blew it -- again!

 

For some, it's a never lose scenario.   They'll change their view as often as is possible so they're never wrong....

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 positions? I'll go in order of most to least likely:

 

1. D-lineman

2. O-lineman

3. Linebacker

 

If there was a safety worth our 1st round pick that would be #3 but I don't think there is one.

 

If I'm going with a specific guy to predict, maybe someone like Jordan Phillips (if he reaches us). 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arik Armstead(he is kind of raw but he has all the tools to be an excellent 3-4 DE).

If M. Peters still on the board i would take him that would make the Colts CB one of the best of the league but trouble players hasn't been handled really well on Indy(Da'Rick, Purifloy).

Otherwise i would trade down and get another 2nd and maybe a 3rd, we could get a serviceable S or an ILB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your post is perfectly reasonable and fair....

 

But I'd like to add this....   (and it's not directed at you)

 

If Gurley or Gordon are there when we pick and we pass....   and either one turns into something great...   there will be a number of posters here who will go crazy on Grigson.    Won't matter that they've said we shouldn't use a 1st on a RB,  they'll flip-flop, and say we should've grabbed the guy,  and we passed and now he's great and Grigson blew it -- again!

 

For some, it's a never lose scenario.   They'll change their view as often as is possible so they're never wrong....

 

I agree many will do that ... there will definitely be some complaining if we pass on Gurley or Gordon regardless; but if we pass on them and the player we draft doesn't make an immediate impact or at least show some significant potential, combined with Gurley or Gordon having a great season I am sure the board will probably melt down with people screaming for Grigson's head. 

 

I admit if Grigson whiff's on another 1st round pick I will be pretty aggravated, and will definitely expect him to be on the hot seat at the end of the season (unless maybe he hits home runs with a significant portion of the other draft picks ... lol); but it won't be because he did not draft Gurley or Gordon.

 

I just don't think I will ever be able to get on board with a 1st round RB in any draft ... the ROI for spending a 1st rnd round pick on a RB vs what we could get in a later round just seems marginal compared to many other positions. 

 

Maybe if the stars aligned perfectly and we were stacked at every position, with starting caliber back ups for the guys who may get injured, retire, or become free agents I would be all for a 1st rnd RB ... but unfortunately I don't see that scenario ever being reality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree many will do that ... there will definitely be some complaining if we pass on Gurley or Gordon regardless; but if we pass on them and the player we draft doesn't make an immediate impact or at least show some significant potential, combined with Gurley or Gordon having a great season I am sure the board will probably melt down with people screaming for Grigson's head. 

 

I admit if Grigson whiff's on another 1st round pick I will be pretty aggravated, and will definitely expect him to be on the hot seat at the end of the season (unless maybe he hits home runs with a significant portion of the other draft picks ... lol); but it won't be because he did not draft Gurley or Gordon.

 

I just don't think I will ever be able to get on board with a 1st round RB in any draft ... the ROI for spending a 1st rnd round pick on a RB vs what we could get in a later round just seems marginal compared to many other positions. 

 

Maybe if the stars aligned perfectly and we were stacked at every position, with starting caliber back ups for the guys who may get injured, retire, or become free agents I would be all for a 1st rnd RB ... but unfortunately I don't see that scenario ever being reality.

 

I'm of the view we should find a RB in this draft in the 4th round.

 

I'd like to use our first 3 picks on defense and the OL.

 

But I agree,  Grigson is pushing his chips into the center of the table.   He's got to do well in this draft.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm of the view we should find a RB in this draft in the 4th round.

 

I'd like to use our first 3 picks on defense and the OL.

 

But I agree,  Grigson is pushing his chips into the center of the table.   He's got to do well in this draft.

Don't worry, NewColtsFan, he will! Grigs is tough. He'll show it in the draft to back up the FAs thus far and to insert new ones to plug up the holes in the lines.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They are still in first round interview mode. I'd expect that to continue assuming they want to interview guys still in the playoffs. Keep in mind the Texans had to get special approval to interview Bieniemy when they did, because they failed to interview him on the off week. They can't interview him again till they are done (unless they seek a waiver from the NFL again).   Purely my opinion, but I think it's simple to me.   If Watson stays, Bieniemy will be the HC. Anyone other than Bieniemy is a signal that Watson is gone. That assumes though that there are teams willing to mortgage their future...   
    • TO's stats absolutely warranted first ballot... but he had antics on the field (e.g., the Dallas Star incident, spitting in DeAngelo Hall's face) and was also a cry-baby who was often in conflict with the media and front offices of teams he played on, and thought by many to be a subpar teammate (at least for portions of his career).  He also did other things (e.g., the Desparate Housewives skit before MNF, OD on pain meds) which made him unpopular with the media, who are ultimately who vote players into the HOF.   Marvin also deserved to be a 1st ballot HOFer.  Although he got in before TO, I firmly believe Marv's alleged shooting incidents and the allegations of him punching a younger fan at a pro-bowl game were held against him in voting.  I know it's said that the HOF is for what players did on the field, and off field stuff shouldn't come into play -- but it's voted on by people (i.e., sports writers) and there surely is some sort of human element that goes into the vote casting process.     You're right... Reggie will get in, just a matter of when.  While I do think some of Marv's off-field issues hindered him, there were also guys like Andre Reed (who had been eligible for almost a decade) and Tim Brown who were waiting to get into the HOF... both deserving HOFers who got overlooked previous years as guys like Jerry Rice and Cris Carter got in.   While I think the main knock on Reggie will be that he was WR#2 to Marvin for a decent part of his career, and the fact he wasn't all-decade team and only a 1x First-team All Pro (and 2x 2nd team).  That said, he's one of the most prolific WRs in NFL history and has some of the best post-season stats of any WR in NFL history.  Megatron definitely was a physical freak who changed the game, but his career was not long enough to put him in the record books like Reggie (who is top 10 in just about every category and top 5 in several post-season categories).  The only other WR on the ballot is Torry Holt who is a 2x finalist -- Reggie has more all-pro appearances, 1 less probowl than Holt, though Reggie has more yards, TDs and receptions.  They both have 1 SB ring, with Reggie having greater post-season success with individual stats, and Holt was 2nd team 2000s all-decade which Reggie wasn't.  Holt was also 2nd fiddle to Isaac Bruce for a decent part of his career.   Not making any guarantees, but compared to the WR classes when Marv and TO were finalists (including guys like Reed and Tim Brown who had been on the wait-list for a while) as well as studs across the board (e.g., Jerome Bettis, Derrick Brooks, Michael Strahan, Aeneas Williams, Junior Seau, WIll Shields, Favre, Orlando Pace, etc..).... I think this class is pretty weak.  After Peyton and Woodson, as I mentioned earlier in this thread, I don't see any guy in this class who clearly deserves to be a HOFer more than Reggie does.      He has to retired first and if he keeps taking his Benjamin Button diet, that may not happen.
    • Personally I think the future QB is already on the roster in Eason. To be honest we don't have a clue on his abilities in the NFL. He has all the physical tools. In this offense he wouldn't have to be superman to be successful.  I am pretty sure Ballard will pull some surprises out of his little black book. He seems to do that every season so far. 
    • Or your bling "Love" of him has altered yours... 
    • Thanks for that. I know there is more, not a lot more but there have been blurbs through the season and comments/talk on sirius nfl 88 as well. There was one recently on roto but for the life of me I couldn't find it. I'm not sure if it was removed by roto or not. Don't know why they would but... anyway thanks again
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...