Jump to content
Superman

Colts meetings with draft prospects (merge)

Recommended Posts

I'm feeling real strong about a Duke Johnson/Frank Gore tandem as of late.   I like Cory Grants speed, but I'm having trouble seeing the need for him if we already have Jeff Demps. 

Demps has been in the league 3 years and can't find the field. He is constantly injured. NE IR for knee Tampa IR for groin surgery. Tampa was the only place he made the active roster. That was short lived.  

 

Grant is stronger 225 22x has better hands and is more dedicated to the sport. Demp's first choice has always been track. I don't think they are quite the same player. Grant would be someone I would love to see us take a look at late.  I think he will find a role in the league.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Demps has been in the league 3 years and can't find the field. He is constantly injured. NE IR for knee Tampa IR for groin surgery. Tampa was the only place he made the active roster. That was short lived.  

 

Grant is stronger 225 22x has better hands and is more dedicated to the sport. Demp's first choice has always been track. I don't think they are quite the same player. Grant would be someone I would love to see us take a look at late.  I think he will find a role in the league.   

 

You're saying this about a backup player who is being drafted in the 7th round or undrafted?  Grant is not much different from Demps.

 

Bench pressing 225lbs gazillion times does not mean you'll be a good player. 

 

http://www.nfl.com/draft/2015/profiles/corey-grant?id=2553232

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Demps has been in the league 3 years and can't find the field. He is constantly injured. NE IR for knee Tampa IR for groin surgery. Tampa was the only place he made the active roster. That was short lived.  

 

Grant is stronger 225 22x has better hands and is more dedicated to the sport. Demp's first choice has always been track. I don't think they are quite the same player. Grant would be someone I would love to see us take a look at late.  I think he will find a role in the league.   

 

Somehow Demps is still on our roster though.  When's the last time he ran track?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Demps has been in the league 3 years and can't find the field. He is constantly injured. NE IR for knee Tampa IR for groin surgery. Tampa was the only place he made the active roster. That was short lived.  

 

Grant is stronger 225 22x has better hands and is more dedicated to the sport. Demp's first choice has always been track. I don't think they are quite the same player. Grant would be someone I would love to see us take a look at late.  I think he will find a role in the league.   

 

 

Grant can't even find a good career in College.  I'm sure Demps was better than him in College as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not looking for an argument we will see

 

Respect.  Not a biggie for me.  I just think they are similar, but to each his own.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll have to look at Davis more. He's the back no one seems to talk about. I've read his NFL.com write up and he gets compared to Alfred Morris.

It would be nice if he fell to our pick in the 4th.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@ByNateTaylor: Colts coach Chuck Pagano was here for #FAU pro day with the intent to see D'Joun Smith after seeing him at the combine.

@IanHest: #Colts HC Chuck Pagano here at #FAU Pro Day. Told me he was very impressed w what he saw. Doesn't name names but eluded to Smith & Whitehead

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@jkatzenstein: Michigan State RB Jeremy Langford has had visits with the Broncos, Colts and Buccaneers.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd draft him just for his name. Du-u-u-u-u-u-u-u-uke 

 

If he and Boom Herron are both playing it would be Duuuuuuke,  Booooooom, Duuuuuuuke, Booooom.  LOL!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Drafting OL would be a very smart move actually

Only if you want to do stupid stuff like protect Luck or run the ball

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For what it's worth...

 

Dorsett said he met with the Colts at the combine and after his Pro Day.

 

This list does not reflect that.

 

My point is that while this list is helpful,  it's not 100% absolute and should not be viewed as definitive....

 

It's not perfectly accurate.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@ByNateTaylor: Colts coach Chuck Pagano was here for #FAU pro day with the intent to see D'Joun Smith after seeing him at the combine.

@IanHest: #Colts HC Chuck Pagano here at #FAU Pro Day. Told me he was very impressed w what he saw. Doesn't name names but eluded to Smith & Whitehead

 

Just went through the whole thread, and unless I missed something, this is the only pick that lines up with a visit that we know about.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just went through the whole thread, and unless I missed something, this is the only pick that lines up with a visit that we know about.

 

I'm pretty sure NFL.com had us linked with Clayton Geathers...   not saying it was Pagano (though it may have been)  but certainly Colts' coaches.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, I appreciate you straightening out the information.  That still isn't the number of possible schedules, it's just the number they created based on the financial needs mixed with the venue availability issues and other stuff.   There are some horrendous schedules for certain teams out there.  Whatever human intervention took place, they clearly didn't care about screwing teams.  Oakland and Tampa got it the worst and it was needless.  But money is all that matters, not the health of the players or fairness of competition.  That much is clear.  
    • I didn't suggest anything. I'm just saying that by applying you logic to everyone on the roster, we shouldn't need to upgrade anything. Or does that just hold true to WR?
    • Simple.  It means we need to continue to look elsewhere for someone ready to play out of the box.  Someone who shines, even if its just as a rookie.  I would suggest the draft and we hope that Cain's brief spark before injury was more than fools gold.  Johnson and Paschal had brief moments where they appeared capable but certainly were far from Elite talent.  Rogers and the rest of the guys on the roster after Hilton and Funchess seem like cannon fodder for the most part.  We need elite talent.  We need elite speed.  We need elite hands.  We need elite route running.  In essence, we need SOMETHING to be elite about our qualified #2 and #3.  I didn't see anything that suggested "Elite" from any of these guys last year.  Did you? Someone will be #2 even if they're terrible.  There WILL be a #2.  What I think most people hope for is that the #2 has something elite, if not many things elite about their skill set.  Outside of Hilton, that isn't a word that applies to the backups from last year and camp bodies.     Are you going on the record to say we have our full time, long term #2 and eventual #1 when Hilton is gone on the roster?  Who would that be?  And no matter how you answer, using your criteria, what supposed practical value is that supposed to have?     What practical value does my opinion have? At least the same value as any opinion you or anyone else shares.  None of us have power over the team.  The point of a message board is to post opinions and discuss.  You apparently disagree with my statement, so let's hear who our #2 elite talent is among the scrubs? Settling for a #2 without elite talent is what we did last year.  Ryan Grant was devoid of anything elite and it showed.     Questions? 
    • Based on snap counts last year. TE was 1.29, WR 2.56, RB 1.03 So we ran 2 TE sets a little less than a 3rd of the time (likely a lot on early running downs or RZ), 3 WR sets more than half the time, and used only one RB except for a few instances.    A few things to ponder.... How sure are you that DF was signed assumed to be full time starter? By most reports, Cain had locked down the #2 spot last year before he got injured. Do you think Cain was told DF was signed to be the starter? Might he have been signed to provide depth to the unit while Cain gets his form back? Or even while a drafted WR comes on....   Also, as discussed, DF's most successful routes were short to intermediate middle type routes (not X WR routes). Not necessarily perimeter or deep. Do you think the coaches will force fit him into areas where he's had the least success? It's also been discussed that he might find more success as a big or bully slot?   In terms of stretching the field... If you've read up on Reich's offense, there is a lot of talk about "4 vert" or K gun (going back to his own QB days). Yes there is a lot of up tempo quick hits, but there is supposed to be a stretch element too. It's supposed to be multiple formations, multiple plays, all up tempo. 4 vert is just what it sounds like. 4 players going vertical. Not just all short to intermediate. Luck can throw every ball. Not using his vertical talents would be a bit silly, no?   On the whole WR unit, we have literally only one proven guy and that's TY. Potential and talent are great words, but we have only TY that's proven. DF has had his ups and downs, and hopefully he gets it turned around. I love Cain, but he's rehabing and didn't exactly light the world on fire at Clemson. Both he and Renfrow were there in 16 and 17. Cain stayed about the same while Renfrow took a nice step forward.   All the other guys (Pascal, Johnson, Fountain) are projects that we hope might pan out. You mentioned Johnson, and I like his potential too, but he didn't do much at TX, and has been hurt 2 of his 3 NFL years. In short, based on last years stats, not one WR ranked inside the top 80 in yards other than Hilton. It's incredible what Luck did with all the moving parts last year, but he shouldn't have to work this hard.    And you mentioned you'd take a RB early. If we're talking about proven, and also potential... When Mack came back in game 6 IIRC, we were a top 10 rushing team the rest of the year (I think if you normalize, Mack would have been 5th or 6th in yards). We also just drafted Hines who had a very good first year (700+ all purpose yards), and Wilkins who averaged 5.6 yards per carry in back up duty to Mack. Individually, that's much more proven than our WR corp. I would like to have a power back compliment over Williams, but that's in the middle to late rounds.   Not saying we will, or won't take a WR early, but every mock and "needs" board out there has WR in the top 2. Even Colts.com listed WR first in their post FA needs. Of course Ballard will do what he wants, but the overwhelming majority of "experts" out there are saying Indy needs to upgrade WR. 
    • WHERE EXACTLY did I say any of the nonsense you stated above?  Dude, I don't know you but you either have the wrong person or you are simply projecting.  I didn't comment on the 30 allowed visits at all.  I made no pro or con comments of any kind on the topic.  I asked a legit question that I did not know the answer to.  You need to.. uh... relax or something.  It's all in your head! 
  • Members

    • PureLuck

      PureLuck 94

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Irish YJ

      Irish YJ 351

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jchandler7

      jchandler7 238

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Melancholie

      Melancholie 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...