Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Super Bowl game thread


21isSuperman

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 752
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Unbelievable historic blunder.   Fair or not that will take some of the shine off Russell Wilson (and it wasn't really his fault).  Imagine if he had two consecutive SB wins -- but instead to have a SB loss.  Just heartbreaking for him.

 

And what an unbelievable high for Butler, the UDFA rookie who made the INT.  I can't believe  what I just saw. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JbZLUCJ.gif

 

lmao

If there's one positive to take from NE winning, it's seeing that big mouth in tears instead of jabbering.

 

You sad, bro?

 

Also Lynch deserved the opportunity to run it home ftw. I don't give a rats about the rest of SEA but the guy played his butt off all year and they took it out of his hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This confirms it - the NFL is RIGGED!

 

That is the only explanation that makes sense after this game!

 

Superbowl with less than 1 minute to go and you make the dumbest call in superbowl history? Really?

 

Congratulations cheaters!!!!! You cheated and got away with it again! WTG!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe Cool never lost in the big game, and Tom "this isn't Isis" Brady has... and the team tucked and cheated all the way there. There is no doubt that Joe Montana will always be the best to play the qb position.b185c6cf468b5486dd80d68f57de76e0_crop_ex

Brady has been to more Super Bowls, won just as many AND he has better overall career stats. Get a clue.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe Cool never lost in the big game, and Tom "this isn't Isis" Brady has... and the team tucked and cheated all the way there. There is no doubt that Joe Montana will always be the best to play the qb position.

b185c6cf468b5486dd80d68f57de76e0_crop_ex

Yeah - never lost a SB.  And the game was tougher then.  Less rules to protect the QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the one yard line you throw the ball.  M. Lynch in the back field and they threw the ball.  If Seattle does not want M. Lynch the Colts need to be the first in line to sign him. I don't want to hear anything about Seattle O-Line. That O-line did not block any better than Colts O-line.  M. Lynch should be getting a call from Ryan within the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care, they played a perfect game today. Overcame two turnovers that could have easily turned things upside down for them. 

 

They made that defense look worse than Green Bay did a few weeks back.

 

As much as I rag on these guys and have fun with pats fans on here, I can't say nothing now. Brady got ring #4, they got the 4th championship, and they played perfect today. They wanted it more.

 

They deserved it after playing like that today. I don't care about the past, they knocked out the #1 defense and made them look mediocre as hell for the entire 4th quarter. Too bad for Green Bay, cause after watching this game, I am sure the Packers would have gave New England a much more fun SB than this. 

 

Seattle's offensive woes totally came up. It did against Green Bay too where they turned the ball over 5 times and looked god awful until the final 5 minutes. 

 

At least Blount gets a ring now! Watched this guy in Tampa for a few years, always liked him. We have the Steelers to thank for giving New England another weapon, so thanks Steelers. Revis is another great player that deserved a ring today, hopefully it's enough for him to make the Hall of Fame in the future. 

 

 

I still can't believe this is the same Seattle team that destroyed Denver last year. As someone said last year "the Patriots wouldn't have laid down like that" well they didn't lay down today after being down by 10 points when it could have easily turned into a blow out. 

 

 

Remember, Brady threw an INT in the endzone in the first quarter. They could have easily been up by two scores, and Seattle had to play catch up all day. They really dominated this game. It would have been 35-24 had it not been for that one mistake. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He lost games which is something Bradshaw & Montana never did in their runs... and there is nothing tainted about those runs either.

Poor argument. He went to more Super Bowls than Montana. Getting to the SB > getting knocked out in the playoffs, i.e. not making the SB (like Montana did).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marshawn is a one-of-a-kind beast. He'd immediately change our team and could even bring us over the Pats hump.

Great player, but let's not be ludicrous. He'd open up our offense since he can run.......but can he STOP the run? We kinda need, ya know, a DEFENSE to win a championship and ours is a joke outside of Davis and Mathis.

 

Even if we  had ML, assuming everything else remains the same the Pats are a better team from head to toe. At best we're equal with them at a few things, but not superior at anything over them aside from our punter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He 's actually damn good, but it's hard to defend that call.

Yeah, he's actually done a decent job.  But he had the win in the bag with Marshawn Lynch.  If you have Trent Richardson in your backfield, I can understand the hesitation to run it.  But with Lynch?  You run that ball 100 times out of 100

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah... Richardson needs players who can separate and who can get open deep. IMO "give the inaccurate QB a contested catch receiver with large catch radius" is one of the tropes that hasn't proven to work well. Contested catches have about 50-55% success rate even with the best of contested catch receivers and with relatively accurate QBs... now if you think AR's accuracy is not good, drop that rate even more. The best way to give a relatively inaccurate QB better chance to complete passes is to give him a WR who separates and and who is open so the QB would have more of a margin for error to throw the ball a little behind or ahead or a little higher or lower than ideal. (we are not talking about uncatchable balls here... those will be uncatchable for anyone really). In that regard, one thing I would agree about is - we need WRs who have good hands and have good ball skills.   And this is ignoring that AR has indeed been pretty good with his accuracy on passes at intermediate and long range. His biggest problem coming into the league was the short stuff and he was already showing improvements in that deparment before he got injured.    And Worthy is the WR who created the most separation from anybody in this draft :   
    • Richardson  accuracy  on deep balls is his strength.  Hence why you pair an elite deep threat in worthy.
    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
    • In a year when the Colts were in serious need of a QB and in position to draft one, Ballard came up in front of the media 3 days before the draft and straight up said something to the effect of "That guy everybody in media is talking about(Levis), we are not taking him". I don't know why you think the Colts are trying to throw us off the scent this year specifically. They are not trying to give us away the pick(thus the vagueness), but I also don't really think they are trying to mislead anybody. This usually becomes specifically apparent in retrospect after the draft when you look back at a lot of those quotes in the videos they release pre-draft... and they were talking precisely about players we ended up drafting, which they reveal in the post-draft video by extending some of those quotes(they did that with AR last year for example).    And about why people are doing it(guessing who they are talking about) - because it is fun. Nobody has the illusion that we will be right in our guesses 100% of the time... or anywhere close really... but it's still fun. And it's part of why the Colts release those videos with those quotes - to create engagement with the fanbase... part of which, and the entirety of which that 70 pages thread and whole board is about in the offseason. is to guess who the Colts might take and how they might feel about specific prospects.
  • Members

    • Dark Superman

      Dark Superman 1,778

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,150

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,290

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fingers

      Fingers 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,176

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,239

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MFT5

      MFT5 325

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...