Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ColtsBlueFL

Speculation Thread: What do you think happened at Deflategate? (Merge)

Recommended Posts

I intend to impose more stringent penalties on both the club and the responsible individual(s).

They don't have that yet.

they don't have to, they can still punish the club. Fines and/or draft picks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they don't have to, they can still punish the club. Fines and/or draft picks

Fines maybe although I doubt it. No way draft picks without the person(s) responsible. If that was the case, they would have already done that on Monday. They need more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fines maybe although I doubt it. No way draft picks without the person(s) responsible. If that was the case, they would have already done that on Monday. They need more.

an investigation doesn't conclude in a day. The balls were tampered with. That's all they need. It doesn't mean they aren't trying to find out exactly who did it. The league will interview every player and staff member. That probably won't happen until after the superbowl. This isn't going away anytime soon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

an investigation doesn't conclude in a day. The balls were tampered with. That's all they need. It doesn't mean they aren't trying to find out exactly who did it. The league will interview every player and staff member. That probably won't happen until after the superbowl. This isn't going away anytime soon

We will see but difficult to punish more than a fine without the culprit. Schefty said without proof of who did the tampering, Pats will get off completely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

an investigation doesn't conclude in a day. The balls were tampered with. That's all they need. It doesn't mean they aren't trying to find out exactly who did it. The league will interview every player and staff member. That probably won't happen until after the superbowl. This isn't going away anytime soon

http://www.sportsgrid.com/nfl/adam-schefter-on-deflate-gate-nfl-struggling-to-find-evidence-might-not-punish-anyone/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We will see but difficult to punish more than a fine without the culprit. Schefty said without proof of who did the tampering, Pats will get off completely.

Do you always believe everything he says :???:   Oh right your believe Tom boy and BB so I guess you would believe Schefty also. You know we all know how you feel so why don't you take a rest. ;) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you always believe everything he says :???:   Oh right your believe Tom boy and BB so I guess you would believe Schefty also. You know we all know how you feel so why don't you take a rest. ;)

Schefty is one of the most connected people to the league. Maybe the most connected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Schefty is one of the most connected people to the league. Maybe the most connected.

Whatever   :slaphead:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Schefty is one of the most connected people to the league. Maybe the most connected.

as is mortensen and glazer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Schefty is one of the most connected people to the league. Maybe the most connected.

He was way wrong on the suspensions this season.

Changed his story more times than you can count on your hands until Mortenson reported the truth.

He may not be as connected as you think and he most certainly isn't always right. He just likes to be "first".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He was way wrong on the suspensions this season.

Changed his story more times than you can count on your hands until Mortenson reported the truth.

He may not be as connected as you think and he most certainly isn't always right. He just likes to be "first".

I didn't say he was infallible just very connected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they don't have to have anymore evidence than they already have. Again, it doesn't mean they aren't still looking, they haven't interviewed any players or staff yet

Without more, fines is probably it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't this the special investigator that was brought in on the bullying incident in Miami and they found Richie Incognito guilty and he was severely punished by the NFL. :???:    That makes me think that this will be done correctly. :)

Kinda like using a hammer to kill a bug, but if they wanna pay the man....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brady informed ball boy to deflate the balls.Maybe this is standard practice for him. Anyway he can be telling the truth when he says "he" did not alter the balls in any way. But I bet this was done by his order

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are already screwing this up .. trust me.

 

 

They may be.   They've screwed up lots of things this year.     But trusting YOU is the last thing I'm going to do.   You haven't shown one bit that you understand what happened.     You don't seem to know what the Patriots did and you don't seem to care much.

 

If you want to be a fan-girl about it -- fine.   But don't ask me to respect the word of someone who today has been making arguments that were proven incorrect days ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We will see but difficult to punish more than a fine without the culprit. Schefty said without proof of who did the tampering, Pats will get off completely.

 

It doesnt matter who did it.  Chain of Custody means that the Patriots were responsible and it was in their control and therefore are held accountable.  The Colts balls would have been filled the exact same time and place as the Patriots and theirs didnt deflate.  They can punish the organisation with the current evidence as is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For some humor. From the NY Post.

 

B8EGX6hCYAA78ss.png

 

and underneath it says....

 

"Guys want to be him, girls want to be next to him, but nobody believes. him"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got home from work and thought I'd do a little catching up...

 

I see the same 'ol  same 'ol   ad nauseam   :puke:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

didn't you just say he wouldn't do this until the investigation was over?

He did it following the league's announcement. I expect him to speak in person when the investigation is over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and underneath it says....

 

"Guys want to be him, girls want to be next to him, but nobody believes. him"

yeah. The first two are still true. Not sure he cares about the third.

 

But the Post has been having a field day. I must say their title writers are some of the best in the business ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They may be.   They've screwed up lots of things this year.     But trusting YOU is the last thing I'm going to do.   You haven't shown one bit that you understand what happened.     You don't seem to know what the Patriots did and you don't seem to care much.

 

If you want to be a fan-girl about it -- fine.   But don't ask me to respect the word of someone who today has been making arguments that were proven incorrect days ago.

lol. I am not fan girl. I have been saying from day one that this is ON Brady and it still is.

 

What arguments would those be?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brady informed ball boy to deflate the balls.Maybe this is standard practice for him. Anyway he can be telling the truth when he says "he" did not alter the balls in any way. But I bet this was done by his order

Exactly every statement Brady and Belichick made were calculated and krafted errrrr crafted in a manner to deny everything while actually denying nothing!

 

I didnt alter the ball in any way ... of course you did not do the deed yourself so you can claim that without telling a lie.

 

I was totally surprised to hear about this monday ... yes because you had thought you had gotten away with it again like you had the entire year - not really telling a lie.

I have no knowledge of what happened ... he can say that because he was not present when it happened - not really a lie.

 

Trying to figure out how it happened - what was the process ... well he might not know the exact method employed to deflate the balls so not really a lie,

 

I would never do anything to break the rules ... I reckon since he was not the one who actually deflated the ball he thinks he was not the one to break the rule - not really a lie.

 

Everyone is trying to figure out what happened. ... Of course they want to know who told on them - how were they caught?  How can they become better at deceiving?

 

Once I approve the balls those are the ones I expect on the field .... indeed he could have expected the deflated balls to be on the field - no lie here either.

 

On and on and on deny everything while denying nothing at all ... He came across like a practiced witness in a trial ... if they ask this you say this .... What a joke!

 

I think his nerves got to him as he surely got away from the practiced script and incriminated himself multiple times

 

I can only speak for myself - I handle the ball on every play - I want to be very familiar with my equipment - I like the balll at 12.5 PSI - that is the perfect grip for me -  yet I had no idea the balls were 2 PSI low ...

 

Brady and the Patriot Organization are FRAUDS!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol. I am not fan girl. I have been saying from day one that this is ON Brady and it still is.

 

What arguments would those be?

 

Well...   I haven't gone back to see all of your posts, but even today -- after I you used this the other day and I corrected you -- you wrote that the NFL hasn't proven anything yet.

 

That's like saying police standing over a dead body can't call it a crime unless they know who did it.

 

The NFL has 12 under-inflated footballs.    11 of them by a large amount and the 12th by a small amount.    That's a dead body.  That's an NFL crime.

 

The only thing they don't have is who committed the crime?   Belichick?   Brady?   Who?    But if no one admits it, the NFL can't still punish the Pats.    Why you think they won't or can't is a mystery....

 

But there was a crime and the NFL and everyone else knows it.

 

The only questions will be will the NFL find someone guilty and what will the punishment to be the franchise be?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly every statement Brady and Belichick made were calculated and krafted errrrr crafted in a manner to deny everything while actually denying nothing!

I didnt alter the ball in any way ... of course you did not do the deed yourself so you can claim that without telling a lie.

I was totally surprised to hear about this monday ... yes because you had thought you had gotten away with it again like you had the entire year - not really telling a lie.

I have no knowledge of what happened ... he can say that because he was not present when it happened - not really a lie.

Trying to figure out how it happened - what was the process ... well he might not know the exact method employed to deflate the balls so not really a lie,

I would never do anything to break the rules ... I reckon since he was not the one who actually deflated the ball he thinks he was not the one to break the rule - not really a lie.

Everyone is trying to figure out what happened. ... Of course they want to know who told on them - how were they caught? How can they become better at deceiving?

Once I approve the balls those are the ones I expect on the field .... indeed he could have expected the deflated balls to be on the field - no lie here either.

On and on and on deny everything while denying nothing at all ... He came across like a practiced witness in a trial ... if they ask this you say this .... What a joke!

I think his nerves got to him as he surely got away from the practiced script and incriminated himself multiple times

I can only speak for myself - I handle the ball on every play - I want to be very familiar with my equipment - I like the balll at 12.5 PSI - that is the perfect grip for me - yet I had no idea the balls were 2 PSI low ...

Brady and the Patriot Organization are FRAUDS!

Elaborated beautifully. Well done!! I loved the krafted part :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well...   I haven't gone back to see all of your posts, but even today -- after I you used this the other day and I corrected you -- you wrote that the NFL hasn't proven anything yet.

 

That's like saying police standing over a dead body can't call it a crime unless they know who did it.

 

The NFL has 12 under-inflated footballs.    11 of them by a large amount and the 12th by a small amount.    That's a dead body.  That's an NFL crime.

 

The only thing they don't have is who committed the crime?   Belichick?   Brady?   Who?    But if no one admits it, the NFL can't still punish the Pats.    Why you think they won't or can't is a mystery....

 

But there was a crime and the NFL and everyone else knows it.

 

The only questions will be will the NFL find someone guilty and what will the punishment to be the franchise be?

My post was about finding the culprit. Not the deflated balls. But if all they have is the footballs and no process, no chain of command, no one responsible then yeah maybe an organization fine or maybe nothing. You have to prove tampering with human hands for any real punishment. That is why they hired the investigative team. There is no way Goodell can say to Kraft I am charging you with tampering and only have the footballs ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My post was about finding the culprit. Not the deflated balls. But if all they have is the footballs and no process, no chain of command, no one responsible then yeah maybe an organization fine or maybe nothing. You have to prove tampering with human hands for any real punishment. That is why they hired the investigative team. There is no way Goodell can say to Kraft I am charging you with tampering and only have the footballs ...

the burden of proof is on the pats. The balls were deflated after the inspection. The league can hold the origniazation responsible

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the burden of proof is on the pats. The balls were deflated after the inspection. The league can hold the origniazation responsible

lol. No it's not. The burden is on the league to prove chain of command and who deflated them. Again, that is why they hired the investigative team. If just footballs, a fine or possibly nothing ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol. No it's not. The burden is on the league to prove chain of command and who deflated them. Again, that is why they hired the investigative team. If just footballs, a fine or possibly nothing ...

That is wishful thinking to the extreme. A known cheater busted for the second time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is wishful thinking to the extreme. A known cheater busted for the second time

What do you think is going to happen if they have the footballs and nothing else?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the burden of proof is on the pats. The balls were deflated after the inspection. The league can hold the origniazation responsible

Exactly. The franchise is totally responsible for game approved footballs.

As if Brady doesn't know the difference on a 16% decrease in air pressure from where he claims the balls are 'perfect.'

Bottom line, everyone knows he did it. To think otherwise is extremely foolish. Just asinine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you think is going to happen if they have the footballs and nothing else?

a lot more than any other franchise would get other than maybe the saints

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a lot more than any other franchise would get other than maybe the saints

Be specific. What is the punishment for just the footballs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Be specific. What is the punishment for just the footballs?

500,000 grand maybe a third round pick. On top of that endless media scrutiny for the foreseeable future

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

500,000 grand maybe a third round pick. On top of that endless media scrutiny for the foreseeable future

lol. The fine is $25k so they are going to get 20 times that!? And "maybe" a third round pick? Sounds like you are waffling now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol. The fine is $25k so they are going to get 20 times that!? And "maybe" a third round pick? Sounds like you are waffling now.

the fine is not 25 grand for deliberate deception. For a second time at that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the fine is not 25 grand for deliberate deception. For a second time at that

I will book mark this and we can discuss when the punishment if any is handed down ... again assuming all they have is the footballs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wouldn't consider #10 a diss..... but I have a bit of an issue with the Cowpies ranked #2 at the same time.   We not only shut them out last season, we out manned, out-muscled and intimidated them in a way that none of us have seen a Colts team do to any team in a long, long time.   You could say "well its only one game".... and that's true.   But that was a statement game, and I just don't see how Brandt can justify a #2 ranking for Dallas given each team's additions this off-season....not to mention all those other teams he has them ranked ahead of.   As for the Colts...on our own merits.... I would have us closer to the middle of the pack on this list, around 7th and certainly ahead of Dallas.
    • His mom sounds awesome.  
    • Sigh...........   This is beyond really frustrating.    You're accusing me of things I literally haven't done.     That's very Irish of you.    Really annoying.      You ask for benefit of the doubt while never giving it out yourself.   I've put certain things into bold.   I'll try taking them one at a time.   Your first bold...   that this is not me saying that teams that aren't doing this are stupid.    I'm sorry, but when you declare that you've come up that you think is clearly and obvously better,  that you think you've re-invented the wheel and sliced bread,  it certainly feels like you're casting a disapporving eye toward any team that's not doing things your preferred way as a matter of course.   Then you claim,  that I want Ballard in the building ASAP,  but not before January.    Let me see if you understand this word.....   NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!   Was that clear enough for you?       If Irsay had decided in the spring of 16 to fire Grigson and hire Ballard in the spring, I would've been ok with it.   It's not desirable,  but if Irsay made that call THEN,  I'd be ok with it.     Where YOU mis-read me,  is that roughly 95 of owners make this decision during the season.    They see things they don't like and they decide during the season to make a change -- typically when the season ends.    Sometimes, an exec will be fired during the season and someone like Dorsey comes in during the season to oversee things and learn about the organization.    I'm fine with that.  There's no record of me opposing that.   I start with January,  because that's when the business season starts for front office and coaches.   Period.   The NFL views it as preferrable.    But making the switch in the spring is doable, as I've said in every post, and which you have ignored or confused badly.    But if Ballard had been hired in the spring of 16,  I'd have been fine with it.   This isn't the first time I've said some version of this.    This is not some ah-ha moment.   As to the bold declaring that there are tons of qualified guys and that CHOOSING the best guy is another story.   Here's my reponse to that.   No.   nonsense.     They are the same story.    They are connected.    Because you play down the fact that most GM's and most HC's fail.   They get fired before their 4 or 5 year contracts expire.   The owner has seen enough and makes a change.   Saying there are always qualified guys is meaningless.    Because FINDING the best guy who will succeed, isn't just important,  it's EVERYTHING.   All 32 teams can announce they hired a qualified guy.    That isn't hard.    But the vast majority of teams are introducing his successor in a few years.    That's why a franchise like Pittsburgh has very little turnover either in HC or the front office.   While franchises like the Jets or Buffalo or Miami are introducing someone new so often, you can practically set your watch to it.     Generally speaking,  the new GM has a long history of scouting and evaluating talent.   The new HC has a history of success, both as a position coach and a coordinator.   They can easily be called qualified,  (though new guys like Kliff Kingsbury and Zack Taylor do NOT have a long track record of success)  But the vast majority of hires...   are soon enough fired.   That doesn't speak well to their qualifications.      As to you meaning what you're saying...   Of course you mean what you say and I stated that clearly.  I don't know why this should rub you the wrong way.  I literally wrote that I know you mean what you say.    I said what I said as a rhetorical point,  not an attacking point.    My ultimate point was made at the end of my first post to you.   You typically write persuasive arguments.    You're able to frequently made me see your viewpoint.    But not here.    You accuse me of not considering your argument.    I'm sorry,  I am considering what you write.   But I don't see the typical high quality Superman argument.   I don't see points that connect.    Your argument feels like the one you'd make for doable.   It doesn't convince me at all that it's preferable.  
    • Yeah, Ballard said he's a patient guy, and he doesn't mind waiting to pick. We almost traded back from 34 as well if Rock wasn't there. I personally love the "trade back" strategy at the end of round 1, and wouldn't mind doing it in most every draft. A late 1st for a mid-second and early/mid second (from the Redskins) over two drafts is fine with me!
    • Haven't done research on the 2020 draft yet, but if it ends up having an elite WR or OT, I wouldn't mind trading up this year. We'll have to see where we finish (hopefully 32 ), and make a decision from there. Ballard landing the Redskins 2nd rounder may be a brilliant move.
  • Members

    • Shadow_Creek

      Shadow_Creek 416

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 369

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Jammer

      Jared Jammer 97

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Surge89

      Surge89 965

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jcrane

      Jcrane 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SVFD Colts Fan

      SVFD Colts Fan 37

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,322

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Old Colt

      Old Colt 292

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pacolts56

      pacolts56 3,035

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • gnet550

      gnet550 219

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...