Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Luck: Learning From Veteran Qb 'would Be A Positive'


Recommended Posts

we can keep offense around peyton to stay competative and have a chance at superbowl, we can can our defensive shceme ,but draft defense in the next few years so when peyton do retire luck can have a top defense and good ground game now that we have to good full backs ryan mcaffarey, jerome felton and to up and coming backs in d.brown, and d.carter just have to probly restock wr and te if tamme, and pierre our not around?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyways. We dont even know who we are really gonna draft anyway. Polian and the front office ALWAYS end up chosing someone completely different then what we anticipated. How do we know Luck is not going to turn into another Brady Quinn and get drafted in the 2nd or 3rd round. lol. I doubt it will go that long but we'll see!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

luck is gonna be the guy polian know that all his success started with drafting the top qb,

bills - jim kelley

colts - peyton manning

colts 2.0 - andrew luck

lets keep the trend going

Add Collins in there with the Panthers, clearly he's not Kelly or Manning but he was good enough to get the Panthers to a NFC Title Game while Polian was there.

It's how Polian builds a team, he gets his QB and builds around it. He's not going to change his spots and I would bet his son probably believes what his dad does since that's who trained him.

That's why I laugh when I see people saying we should build another way. It's not the way Polian builds a team, and unless he's fired (which I doubt) he's not going to change his spots. If he think Luck can be as good as Manning is and he can get him you better believe that's going to be the pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can too. And that will tell us everything we need to know about how the view him. It will tell us their feelings on the tight end room, and what direction they pick from there will tell us even more.    but if they take him at 15, we won’t know much about what might have happened, as they will be landing someone they had rated highly and fell to them. 
    • Glad that’s over…    if I wanted to argue about it, I would have responded far more in depth than pointing out how you were attempting to gaslight me. I did not. Meaning I was ending my part of whatever the argument was. You “putting a finality to it” and then listing bullet points tells me it was the argument you wanted all along, which makes sense why you brought Grigson up in the first place. Bait, hook, gaslight. Almost got me buddy. You are a funny guy, Doug 
    • Putting a finality on an argument you want to have.   There is a theory that Ballard won't draft a OL high because ARs injuries were not caused by a poor oline.  I felt it important to note that since Luck's major injuries were also not caused by his oline, Ballard could still want to improve it like he did in 2018 simply because AR is The Franchise. And its important to point that out because there has been a running (false) narrative for about 9 years that Luck's oline was the (main) reason for his injuries that kept him out of games.  The (false) narrative is based upon, IMO, a detest of Grigson, and not reality about the facts (or strong rumors) behind the kidney laceration and snowboarding shoulder. Therefore, mentioning Grigson and the (false) narrative was germain to the point about Ballard possibly drafting Oline high this draft to protect AR. Mentioning Grigson shouldn't trigger a CB vs RG discussion, unless people reading it are gaslighted by their own reading lens.
    • That is a very inaccurate description of what happened.  At this point it’s history and doesn’t need to be revisited but I will say Chloe adds value to this board and should be and is by most encouraged to post, even if people don’t always agree with her.  
    • My response was in regards to another posted suggesting that the Colts need to get the pick right when it comes to picking a WR. I agree with you .
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...