-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By NewColtsFan · Posted
Also... Its important to remember about Rodgers, that his career didn’t really start until his 4th year. Favre was still playing and Rodgers was on the sidelines. So his body has much less miles it than you might think it would. That’s a big plus. That said.... trading fir him is going to be expensive.... he and Stafford, both. -
-
By New Zealands #1 Colts Fan · Posted
The good news is either mahomes or brady are going to be a Superbowl loser. -
By CurBeatElite · Posted
Rodgers didn't seem too pleased that GB drafted Jordan Love in the first round in the most recent draft. Sort of a similar situation to Favre, but Rodgers had never threatened to retire. Rodgers seemed very upset after today's loss (rightfully so). He especially seemed angry that LaFleur chose to kick a FG inside the 10 yard line late in the game, at least mad enough to say he would probably have tried to run into the endzone on 3rd down if he thought the coach was going to kick a FG on 4th down rather than give him another shot. It's never a good idea to take someone's words with 100% seriousness in a very bad time (which I'm sure it was for Rodgers after losing that game after an MVP year). That said, Rodgers did have some serious conviction in his voice when he said everyone's future is uncertain, including his own. Rodgers has a bit of a right to be perturbed with some of today's play calling, and perhaps more with the Pack drafting Love in the first round in the 2020 draft -- he's playing at a very high level, has no major injury concerns and doesn't look like he's slowing down at all (he's still 6 years younger than Brady) -- the GB mgmt has seemingly ignored his desire to have more playmakers on offense (after D. Adams, he doesn't really have a whole lot) for a good chunk of his career and if I were him (i.e., MVP QB, future HOFer, with a bit of time left, but a window that's closing) I'd certainly have wanted to see that 1st round pick go towards a WR, OL or basically anything to help him rather than his future replacement. So, yea, it'd probably be a bad move for the Packers to part ways with Rodgers, especially if they have to take on that type of monetary hit.. but ultimately, Rodgers has done enough during his time in the league to have some say in his own fate. If he truly wants out of GB (not saying he does for sure), it's probably more his choice than the Packers' at this point in time. -
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts