-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Popular Now
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By ColtStrong2013 · Posted
I think we are closer to a great offense than a great defense. Especially within the duration of AR rookie contract and JT’s peak years, which I think are the next few seasons. I’d much rather load up offensively to assist AR’s development and then focus on building a strong defense for when that time runs out. That means continuing to build up the o-line and put weapons around AR. That’s basically what Ballard said earlier that their goal was. I just don’t see them focusing on defense, and I hope people on here don’t get disappointed if we see an early run on offense, pass catcher and interior line both, versus needed pieces on defense. Not predicting that will happen, but i do somewhat hope it does. They are both deep classes though, so i wont be shocked if they dont search for mid round value there. -
Honest question; do you think Jim's history with substance abuse negatively impacts the team? The media certainly believes so. I constantly hear media say players, coaches, and front office personnel don't want to come here because of Jim's addiction history and personality. Every player I've seen talk about Jim absolutely loves him and says he's one of their favorite people in the world. -
Penix is dropping a lot. I wonder where he goes. 3rd round? I hope Nabers drops to the Giants. It would be nice to see him in the NorthEast. -
I think we’re probably working either a Kelly or Paye extension Yep -
By ChuggaBeer · Posted
I cant disagree with anything you wrote. I just think a great D can help a growing offense. I also think its easier to add talent on the offensive side of the ball. The D needs more scheme fit that the offense does. Offense can adapt/change to new talent easier than a D can. AlsoI like D better than O
-
-
Members
-
.jpg.03c76055d967f51b813e290416ac9bfa.thumb.jpg.b1d64d49e1863163f4eefe42ad172348.jpg)
Recommended Posts