Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts @ Cowboys Game Day Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

lmao I'll hold you to it!


It's not looking good, but it's still early.  There is lots of time and a lot happens in an NFL game.  I'm not saying we will come back and win it.  I'm just saying the opportunity is still there



Yeah .. agree. I'm on the edge of my seat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pagano cant go out there and catch the ball. Or tackle. OR TAUNT. Stop blaming the coaches.

Pagano should be responsible because this team is consistently not ready to go week in and week out. We can start slow like this and beat bad teams but not a team like Dallas. This game is on pace to be a historical blowout!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As if it wasn't enough seeing a shot of Jerry Jones every other play, we now need to see the same with Emmitt Smith.


Maybe CBS will switch to the Bills game for me....which we'll probably lose...

And I'm tired of seeing that corrupt fat pig Chris Christie as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess we will have to agree to disagree. Pagano coaches like a bad Madden player in my opinion. Lol



In this argument, I have the advantage of hind sight. It absolutely led to 7 points for Dallas and therefore, it was a horrible call.


As a coach, you make a pro/con decision. In that situation, the con way outweighed the pros. There was no reason to go for the fake punt, and therefore, it was still a bad decision even before the play.

For what it's worth, I'm not a fan of Pagano.  I don't think he's a good coach.  But I don't think he's done anything to cost us the game today whereas the players have made all the mistakes.  So in one sense, I completely agree with both of you in criticizing Pagano overall.  But this game, I think he's been fine.


21isSuperman - il make it the car now aswell

haha Sounds good :thmsup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to lose every single game we play until this coaching staff is changed.....PATHETIC


And if Pagano doesn't pull Luck right now, he should be fired tomorrow 

Okay calm down, it's a football game. Don't wish for someone to lose their job because you can't handle a fairly insignificant event.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok. Time to talk about the future. The game is over so here's my thoughts on what has to change: As much as you guys may like him Dqwell Jackson has to go. He has been mediocre at run defense and an atrocity at pass defense. Jerrell Freeman is only a little better. Our defensive line is soft. We have no playmakers/bullies down there. We need a FS. Mike Adams is a beast but Landry can't cover and Sergio is not the answer. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay calm down, it's a football game. Don't wish for someone to lose their job because you can't handle a fairly insignificant event.

If Pagano can't do his job, he doesn't deserve it.


God bless you, sir.  Your optimism is infectious and the only thing making this game bearable.

haha Thanks.  Just trying to make the best out of what's been a really bad game so far


Take Allen out of the game.  It's time to bench him.

Link to post
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All this off season there were those who were talking about how bad Glow was. That he was the weakest link and needed to be replaced. And when Pinter was drafted how he could step in and take Glows spot.     Y'all are looking kind of uninformed at this point.   
    • FWIW I thought this from last weeks mail bag was funny because it seems to support what both you and I are saying.  If what I understand your point being is the dline including Buckner played similarly well both games and my belief that 3techs don’t need to record sacks and tfls to be dominant. : “I can understand why fans who watched last Sunday's opener against the Jaguars, and then checked out the box score afterwards, might come away with the conclusion that DeForest Buckner didn't have much of an impact on the game. After all, the Colts traded away their 13th-overall pick in this year's NFL Draft to acquire Buckner, and then immediately handed him a huge contract extension, so expectations are high. I get that. But looking back at the film, I think what's evident is Buckner deserves a little bit more credit beyond his stat-sheet line of six tackles (one for a loss). As the defensive line started to gel in the second half — that's when it limited Jacksonville to six combined rushing yards and had three of its four sacks — you began to feel Buckner much more consistently, and the attention placed on him allowed for others (I thought linebacker Bobby Okereke was fantastic in the second half) to make plays. Buckner also had the eighth-best week among all NFL interior defensive linemen in run stop win rate in Week 1, according to ESPN. Now, moving forward, of course you want to see more of those impact-type plays out of Buckner — sacks, big run stuffs, forced fumbles, defensive touchdowns, etc. But I think it's also important to to remember there are other ways for the three-tech to impact the game, and Buckner did a pretty good job of that last Sunday.”  
    • I’m a little surprised you don’t see a difference in dline play between  the two games.  I don’t have access to any of the services but I would suspect that The grades are significantly higher for the dline in Sunday compared to the Jax game.   but Sunday was even more dominant than i thought, and I thought it was dominant.  Between the opening drive during which MN gained 75 and scored a FG and their last meaningless drive for 75 yds and a TD, the Colts gave up a total of 25 other yds.    against Jax, we gave up around 60 yds rushing in the 1st half and the dline looked less than dominant then imo.  Jax had 5 of 8 drives during which they scored if you throw out the kneel downs at the end of each half.   Percentage of  tackles and sacks for linemen were very similar in both games.  You said that colts had more pressures during the mn game and I said probably a function of Jax short passing attack.   buckner had 6 tackles v Jax and 3 v mn.  He had no sacks v Jax but 1.5 tfl.  He had 1.5 sacks v mn but no other tfl.  Statistically counting sacks, tackles, and tfl he was “better” V Jax.  But you probably don’t think He was better Iwould suspect.   i would be shocked if the dline didn’t grade out higher v. Mn than Jax even though the tackles, tfl, and sacks were very similar over all.   im sure teams keep advanced stats that show a clearer pic of when a d lineman wins or loses on each Play that doesn’t necessarily match easier to see stats like tackles, etc.   do you have access to the grades?  I’d really be interested in the units grades in the two games.   i agree there can be other factors like obviously opponent strength and the play of LBs and dbs.  And mn looks like they might suck pretty bad surprisingly to me.  I think the main problem with lasts weeks game imo is the LBs are weak in coverage and Indy is as a result susceptible to short passing attacks.     that being said, rarely do dlines dominate the LOs like the colts did.   i maintain that a guy like Buckner and dts in general could have nit recorded a sack, had only a couple of tackles and be more dominant than In a game where he recorded a few tackles and a couple of sacks.    
    • Let's hire an exorcist!  
    • Didn't Nick Bosa get hurt this week too?
  • Members

  • Create New...