-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By EastStreet · Posted
Nobody knows.... But I'd take the risk given I don't like Frank's. -
-
.jpg.03c76055d967f51b813e290416ac9bfa.thumb.jpg.b1d64d49e1863163f4eefe42ad172348.jpg)
No way in hell I'm giving up a first for Stafford. -
By EastStreet · Posted
Schemed open? lol.. You're starting to stretch again, and use what-if type arguments with no statistical basis to minimize simple stats. You do that way too much. MAC made both contested/possession and longer route catches. Do you realize how good 80% is? If not, look at receiving stats. There are very few WRs and TEs with 80%ish catch rates. Most guys in that range are RBs. As far as teams beating down doors, MAC is a RFA, so teams really can't beat down the door unless they want to give up draft picks. And TE is a devalued position, so not going to happen, especially given the little that MAC was used. Most sites only list UFA's in their top FAs, but I've seen MAC listed on a few lists as a top 5 or 10 TE for 2021. I know PFN had him on their list. On the insinuation he isn't shaking folks off... He wasn't used very often, but when he was given a priority read, he looked pretty open to me. Sites grade separation differently, but PP shows MAC clearly better than Ebron. Kelce only had 0.03 better separation. MAC had identical separation to Kittle. As far as where he's catching passes, 3 of his 4 catches vs Buffalo were under 5 yards from the LOS. Only one was 10 or more yards down field. Honestly though, I'd rather see him used like he was in the MN game, where he had 3 catches 15+ yards, and only one at the LOS. In short, you're again making all kinds of statements like they're fact, when they are actually in direct contrast -
By PuntersArePeopleToo · Posted
Bucs and Arians. also went AZ after us never LAR
-
-
Members
-
.jpg.03c76055d967f51b813e290416ac9bfa.thumb.jpg.b1d64d49e1863163f4eefe42ad172348.jpg)
Recommended Posts