-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Popular Now
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By EastStreet · Posted
I totally think we underachieved. We should have won vs Jax (horrible game plan). We should have won vs Pitt (horrible adjustments and late game strategy). We should have been 13-3 and #2 position in the playoffs. But that has nothing to do with Rivers. It was all coaching. If not for those two mistakes, I would have expected us to be playing KC yesterday. -
By EastStreet · Posted
Had Luck and the Colts been more successful, and against Brady in more big games, I'd probably still feel the same. It's just not been much of a rivalry since PM. And it's not like Brady is a jerk, and easy to hate on. He's somewhat humble (relative to his success), and isn't a diva like a lot of others. He just goes about his business, and I admire that. Hoping for a good one in two weeks. I kind of hope he wins, and then retires lol. -
Pat Kirwin on Sirius XM just a short time ago predicted it will be the Colts that get Stafford. I am a Pat Kirwin fan. -
By richard pallo · Posted
Everything he said here makes sense. Especially about Nelson. Let one of our younger guards take Q's place or sign a vet like we did with Glowinski. Bringing Veldeer back would be a smart move as well. You could also draft a tackle and see if he can take the spot from Q. Q is our ace in the hole at tackle. If I'm Q I would want the chance at the spot. -
By EastStreet · Posted
Rivers was like #6 in deep shot accuracy, yet bottom half in deep shot attempts. I think they were very conservative with him. You don't have to have a gun necessarily to go deep, if you're "throwing to a spot" with pass catchers you trust to run the right route, or go up and get the ball. Rivers was pretty successful when allowed to do that.
-
-
Members
-
.jpg.03c76055d967f51b813e290416ac9bfa.thumb.jpg.b1d64d49e1863163f4eefe42ad172348.jpg)
Recommended Posts