Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

BOOM needs to start


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah, I agree

Move forward with Boom & Tipton

Accept the loss with the Richardson trade, I'm done defending him. 3rd string RB looks better than a 1st round pick? What world does that happen in?

In this one which the 3rd string guy is pretty darn fast, and good at what he does. The only knock on Boom is those fumbles which need to be cleaned up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In this one which the 3rd string guy is pretty darn fast, and good at what he does. The only knock on Boom is those fumbles which need to be cleaned up.

You can teach ball security, you can't teach vision.

Boom needs ball security classes

Richardson needs a class on how to deal with unemployment cause he'll be there soon. He's got to go

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can teach ball security, you can't teach vision.

Boom needs ball security classes

Richardson needs a class on how to deal with unemployment cause he'll be there soon. He's got to go

Richardson will be here through his rookie contract because they don't have to pay the guy a whole hell of a lot, and in the open he is able to pick up yards. He lacks the ability to run behind this o-line... when guys like Boom can. I think I'd rather just use Richardson as the back on passing downs, or at the goal line. Although Pep loves him so no back set down there which drives me nuts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't see the game today, but it looks like more of the same for Richardson and a nice day of running for Boom.

 

But yes, the fumbles area huge thing. He needs to clean that up or he won't be on the field much. I think he definitely can, but he must.

Another factor to be considered is how well he is in pass protection. I have seen so little of him I don't know. TRich is decent so if Boom is bad in that area he may need to work on that before we can trust him with the keys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must say, I'm having a harder time defending him as well. Yes our line isn't great, but every back we use with him is running better then him. Maybe time to give Herron more attention in practice, run him with the first team so he starts to improve in other areas of the game quicker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we can all agree that we have seen all that we are going to see from Richardson. He isn't explosive, doesn't have great vision, but is a heck of a pass blocker. Is that good enough?

 

Not for a 1st round draft pick, and not for our starting RB. 

 

Handoffs to Richardson have become a liability. He hardly gains any yards and consistently puts the offense in unmanageable situations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's bad. I heard his combine run was 4.4 but he runs way slower than that.

 

 

He didn't run at the combine....   he ran at his Pro Day and those are very different.

 

Combine equals laser timed,  computer timed.     Pro Day equals hand time.

 

They adjust about .07 for that.

 

And he's much slower today than he was at his Pro Day.

 

Honestly,  if you look at his video from Cleveland,  he's slower today than he was with the Browns.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He didn't run at the combine.... he ran at his Pro Day and those are very different.

Combine equals laser timed, computer timed. Pro Day equals hand time.

They adjust about .07 for that.

And he's much slower today than he was at his Pro Day.

Honestly, if you look at his video from Cleveland, he's slower today than he was with the Browns.

Ah, my mistake. I knew he ran 4.4 sometime. Its hard to believe. I'm not sure if he's ever looked that fast in Indy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Richardson will be here through his rookie contract because they don't have to pay the guy a whole hell of a lot, and in the open he is able to pick up yards. He lacks the ability to run behind this o-line... when guys like Boom can. I think I'd rather just use Richardson as the back on passing downs, or at the goal line. Although Pep loves him so no back set down there which drives me nuts.

Totally agree.  Pep wastes way too many first downs with TR only getting 1 or 2 yards, it hasn't worked most of the year and consistently puts Luck in tough situations.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Richardson is possibly the worst runner I've ever seen at this level.  Every back I can recall the Colts bringing in, be it someone off the street or out of the CFL has looked better. 

 

You want a series of downs to go nowhere?  Hand it to Richardson on 1st down.  If you are absolutely determined to see a series of downs go nowhere, give it to him on 1st and 2nd down. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the future NFL Network will have a "Top 10 Worst Trades of All Time" and the Trent Richardson trade will likely be pretty high.

 

It sucks to think what that pick may have been.

 

It's not only that.  His performance and the reliance on him has really hurt this team over the past two years.  Relying on him has consistently put us in 2nd and 3rd and long, where teams can tee off at Luck.  And last year following the trade, it consistently put us down by 2-3 TDs every week. 

 

It needs to end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Paye pick makes a lot of sense but the Dayo pick surprised me. I wanted a left tackle and thought that there were a couple of guys who would have made a lot of sense.   Ballard and co know way more about those players than I do, however, so I'll continue to trust their judgement until they demonstrate that I shouldn't.    I'd rather have two good pass rushers than one good pass rusher and one bad left tackle.
    • I like the breakdown and agree although i caveat with this:   I don't think Leno or Fisher was 2-3 year deals unless they get what their market is before being cut.   And I do not think CB is going to big against himself to do that.   Leno basically made $8M-$9M each year ($8.8, $5.0, $8.1, $8.1) and was slated to make $9.0M this year before cut.   If the Colts are going to offer him $8-$9M a year I think he would gladly take a 2-3 year deal. But if the Colts are bargain shopping then I think he and Fisher will both be happy to take 1 year deals and prove their worth and re-enter the market next year when there is a lot more money to go around.   Fisher probably won't go for a 2-3 year deal unless he is making $10M+    I would actually ideally like to see us give one of them a 2-3 year deal where we have cost control on a decent contract for a year or two beyond this one.   I think that is a big win if so. More likely scenario has us giving one of them a $6M-$8M deal for a year and then having to either try to extend them if it works out or let them walk if it doesn't. 
    • Best option if healthy - Fisher (will still likely want 2-3 years)   Safest option - Leno (likely wants 3 years min)   Most expensive option - Leno   Cheapest short term option with a level of safety - Okung (PFF predicts a 3 year deal, which I don't see).   IMO, if you don't grab one of those guys, or other quality FA, you'll end up starting Tevi. If you start Tevi, before long you're moving Nelson to LT.... Ballard likely doesn't want to give Leno 3-4 years and high dollars. FIsher comes with risk. IDK... 
    • Here's what PFF says, and how they rank them in terms of FAs available.   In short, Houston had the worst pass rush graded year of his career, but still was top 10 in pass rush win rate. Kerrigan on the other had a career worst year all around, was really lousy vs the run, while many expected a bump up in production per snap due to the reduced role.   If Houston would take a one year deal, I'd rather give him 10M than give Kerrigan 5M.     Don't forget we lost 2 (Autry and Houston) and added 3 (Paye, Dayo, Rochell). So even if Dayo takes longer, we're still even net/net with the addition of Rochell.    I agree he could start over Banogu. As long as Turay is deemed healthy enough to play, he'd be a better passing downs rusher than Kerrigan. Kerrigan wouldn't play on running downs at all for us. He'd be a rotational or depth pass rush specialist at best.
    • Man i respect you. But I just have to say the talent gradient in college is so vast compared to the NFL. I Trust Ballard. It makes sense and no way in hell am i making that trade. Whatever happened to sitting a kid for a year? I mean you got a bag, buy in or gtho.
  • Members

    • jmac_48

      jmac_48 377

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Caffrey

      Caffrey 145

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • boo2202

      boo2202 462

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Southern Cal

      Southern Cal 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • The Shoe Fits

      The Shoe Fits 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tvturner

      tvturner 537

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • WoolMagnet

      WoolMagnet 3,249

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoColts8818

      GoColts8818 4,983

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 10,196

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ScotColt

      ScotColt 188

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...