-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
I would like to seem Mo get more balls thrown his way. Reich doesn't seem to feel the same way. I'm more excited to see the Wentz to Campbell and Pittman connection than the Wentz to Hilton connection. -
Keep an eye on KC, I could see them trade up ahead of us to draft a LT, in this situation. They released both starters at tackle and I imagine will put a priority on getting someone that can protect Mahomes -
That would be a good scenario for the Colts. I like it. -
By coltsfan1965 · Posted
WR is rarely about one guy. Has TY slowed a bit? I'm sure he has. However, we were hoping last year that Campbell or someone else could truly "stretch the field" and open up spots for TY and others. Our receivers are good, but adding someone with more downfield speed or someone who could demand more double teams or at least their best corner would help everyone, especially TY. -
If, you re-read my post, I think I was more or less explaining why the Rams paid such a huge price to acquire Stafford and that Stafford is an elite QB IMO. The original OP is more or less looking through blue colored glasses, stating Ballard once again, won a trade, and a trade that didn’t involve both the Colts and other team (Rams). You can compare those two trades all you want, but it’s just immaterial and pointless. The Rams are in win now mode, the Colts IMO, are not. So, the price for Stafford was too steep for the Colts, who did inquire about Stafford, before trading for Wentz. The trade with Philly, benefitted at the moment, both the Eagles and Colts. Hopefully, Wentz returns to 2017 form and I’m optimistic he will, but I prefer a talent like Stafford whose got another 3-4 good years in him. However, Wentz is now the guy, and I’m fine with it.
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts