Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

Oh so they were expecting it to the left and not center?

 

Likely. An onside kick to the middle of the field to be recovered by the punter isn't exactly the type of play you prepare for. Why they didn't have anybody in the center of the field is beyond me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

He is AWESOME!!!  Thats 3 awesome onside kicks - the last two have been PERFECT - never seen any better.   This guy is awesome on B&T too .... but I gotta say I hope the opponents dont start head hunting him due to his celebrations....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Likely. An onside kick to the middle of the field to be recovered by the punter isn't exactly the type of play you prepare for. Why they didn't have anybody in the center of the field is beyond me.

I have never seen one side of a receiving team play for an onside kick while the rest run back. Just give up bro, you've lost this argument. Comments are now just looking ignorant and intentionally refusing to admit to the obvious. You know what, forget it. I just prefer to ignore *.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never seen one side of a receiving team play for an onside kick while the rest run back. 

 

Of course not, but that was never my argument. When you see a team kick a surprise onside kick, it's almost always because, when they watched the opposing team on tape, they say that the'ye special team players turn their back too quickly during the kickoff. When you do a surprise onside kick, when the teams you're playing later on the season watch the tape on you, they'll focus more on the special teams players being more aware of watching the kick-off before they turn their backs.

 

 

I'm perfectly fine having a constructive conversation  about this, but if you want to continue to use ad-hominen attacks, I see no reason for this to continue. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Likely. An onside kick to the middle of the field to be recovered by the punter isn't exactly the type of play you prepare for. Why they didn't have anybody in the center of the field is beyond me. 

 

 

Of course not, but that was never my argument.

 Thats exactly what you just said, that they were expecting it to the one side and not down the middle.  Either way they didnt play for an onside kick.  You really think they dont tell ST to prepare for onside kicks, that they shouldnt turn their backs too quickly?  Is that not part of what ST do?  If the players make the mistake thats on them.   If other teams delay on their run, this only allows our ST players to get passed the defenders and get to the ball quicker to prevent run outs or catch them sooner when they do.  Its a win win. 

 

want more proof, refer to the highschool coach who ALWAYS onside kicks.  I know its high school, but the teams know its coming and most of the time they cant stop it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I want to know is who called for the onside kick today? Was it radio in from the coaches after seeing the lineup or did patty Mac make his own audible there?

i'd bet it was one of those "if you see them line up in this formation take the shot." Much like the Titans games.
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is actually another point in Pat's favor. All those touchbacks from him booming it out of the back of the endzone completely eliminate any chance of a return game from explosive return men, which in turn shuts down a huge portion of the opponent's special teams game plan. In a game like football where all it takes is one missed blocking assignment to swing momentum, completely eliminating the chance for that to happen is a huge boon to special teams. 

 

Don't hate the touchback, cheer it like the fantastic thing it is.

I totally agree for the rules.  We need to utilize what we have SkyBane.  Patty Mac has become the best punter and kickoff specialist in the league.

 

I hope we save those onside kicks along the way to the playoffs.  :  I think he called that one on his own last night.....WOW.....loved it. :blueshoe:  :blueshoe:  :blueshoe:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I love it when football players have fun on the field, without being disrespectful to the oponent..

Regarding last night's onside kick, i know we all wanted our coaches to be less conservative, but to go for an onside kick in first quarter with a 7-0 lead was absolutely unnecessary..

I didn't like that decision at all..

 

Did you watch the game at all? It was a 100% guaranteed recovery by the Colts. The Texans were 20 yards off the ball. It was genius.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not think I have EVER seen the center of the receiving team that far back since I have watched football.

Amazing the ST coach looked as though he was mad at his players. He called the terrible formation.

Did you read his lips during replay? lol, lets just say he didn't seem happy with himself!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy kicked it to himself. I mean c'mon! 

 

Let me repeat how awesome Pat McAfee is.....

 

The guy kicked it to himself!!! 

 

d2980b90be94f4aa185e868a31a38fb6.gif?141

 

ABSOLUTELY AWESOME!!! 

When my friends were not home, I would do that in the backyard by myself.....and punt straight up too :)

 

photo-main.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you watch the game at all? It was a 100% guaranteed recovery by the Colts. The Texans were 20 yards off the ball. It was genius.

 

dude, chill, you quoted my post from few weeks back :D check the date on it.. it was the titans game, i believe.. 

 

and don't try bailing out of this by saying "oh, but it was the same thing" ;) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy kicked it to himself. I mean c'mon!

Let me repeat how awesome Pat McAfee is.....

The guy kicked it to himself!!!

d2980b90be94f4aa185e868a31a38fb6.gif?141

ABSOLUTELY AWESOME!!!

My heart stoped for a moment, as that ball gingerly bounced towards the required 45 yard line..

There was no player around, but the ball barely crossed the line by one yard..

I was afraid the ball would take a weird bounce sideways or that pat would panic and touch it before it crossed 45..

It turned out perfect!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On a serious not, how is Pat not in discussion for being the best specialist in the game? He's an excellent punter and he kicks the definition of PERFECT onside kicks, 3 of which have been recovered.

 

He's been near-perfect so far this season, and did get ST player of the month for Sept..  He deserves to be included in that discussion.

 

Also, as he ran up and turned around, waiting for the ball you could tell he only had two things in mind: 1) Grab it, and 2) Get on the turf and don't get smashed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the man is playing at a Pro Bowl level this season. 3 successful on side kicks is amazing plus he constantly kicks it out of the end zone. Could a kickoff specialist go to the Pro Bowl as the 3rd special teamer besides the kicker and punter?

with his play and how well he's liked he will prolly make the pro bowl as the punter so no reason a 3 special teamer is needed he IS the best punter in the NFL lol
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never seen one side of a receiving team play for an onside kick while the rest run back. Just give up bro, you've lost this argument. Comments are now just looking ignorant and intentionally refusing to admit to the obvious. You know what, forget it. I just prefer to ignore *.

gg

http://espn.go.com/blog/indianapolis-colts/post/_/id/8211/colts-have-mastered-the-art-of-the-onside-kick

'We kind of knew, we thought that the middle might open up because we hit a surprise onside to the right so teams are kind of fearing it,” McAfee said. “

Link to post
Share on other sites

gg

http://espn.go.com/blog/indianapolis-colts/post/_/id/8211/colts-have-mastered-the-art-of-the-onside-kick

'We kind of knew, we thought that the middle might open up because we hit a surprise onside to the right so teams are kind of fearing it,” McAfee said. “

And what is that supposed to prove. They still didn't play it that way. You can guess and hope what someone might do all day but doesn't mean they are going to. The right and left sides all went back as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This kid could make things really interesting and turn that flat-butt 4-3 into something really special with corners who can press. The scheme could be really sneaky good with that personnel. 
    • I don't know who else we really need to have a bounce back year, especially on D.  Along our DL, we either need to bring back Houston and Autry or figure out how to replace them - but both had pretty solid years.  Lewis was better than he had been his first couple years.  Buckner was a stud and Stewart was solid.  Having Turay come back healthy and seeing Banogu improve would be helpful, but they both played so little last year and hadn't done enough previously to indicate last year was a 'down year'.  At LB, Leonard was a first-team all pro again and very solid.  Walker was solid but saw his snap count decrease and Oke had his ups and downs while seeing his snap count dramatically increase (as @EastStreet pointed out,  not only did his snaps go way up compared to his rookie year but the way he was used was different).  I doubt we see Walker back, so it'd be nice to see Oke improve for sure.  Then in the secondary we had solid play from Rhodes, Carrie, Willis and Moore for the most part.  Blackmon was solid (especially early on, but he seemed to digress as the year went on - IMO, to be expected as he was raw coming in and was coming off a knee injury, I don't think he was supposed to get near the snaps he did last year, but we know what happened with Hooker and sort of forced Blackmon into the fire).  RYS had a down year, but I don't see why he can't bounce back - he's got the physical traits - I tend to think he battled some mental demons after some P-Int penalties, and hopefully he can refine his technique some and come back strong.     In all, on the D, I think we're in good shape.  Keep in mind, it seemed like 'Flus called the D a bit differently last year than he had in earlier years here.  We are, overall (aside from Houston, Autry, Rhodes) very young on D.  We had a very weird off-season last year, which (IMO) is critical for younger guys.  I can't help but think it didn't help the likes of guys like RYS and Oke who saw their roles increase and change (IMO, OKe's change was more than a 'slight' change) between their rookie year and year 2.     On O, ideally we'll see solid QB play from Wentz (I won't go as far as to saying he needs a 'bounce back' year as he hasn't been in Indy before and it sounds like there was a lot of toxicity in Philly, hopefully all he needs in a change of scenery and a reunion with Reich).  Our OL was solid, so as long as we can replace AC at LT I think we'll be OK there.  We had pretty consistent play from Hines and Wilkins throughout the year and JT got dramatically better as the season wore on -- I think if those guys can start up where they left off, we're more than fine at RB.  TY didn't have his best year, but he's be declining for about 3 years now, so if we bring him back, all we can do is hope he stays healthy and I think we'll be in OK shape.  Pittman missed some time with his leg compartment syndrome, but was solid down the stretch, so I don't think we need him to 'bounce back', just continue on his trajectory and he's gonna be solid.  Pascal was solid and I think we've pretty much seen his ceiling, so he just needs to stay solid.  It would be sweet to see Campbell and/or Patmon to emerge, but don't think we need them to 'bounce back' as we've never gotten high level results from them to begin with.     Then on STs, we were pretty solid all around.  Would like to see Blankenship add a bit more umphf to his kicks, but he was solid and Sanchez was solid punting.  The coverage and return units were solid overall.   So really, I think we need a comeback or bounce back year from RYS and maybe Oke... but overall, I don't think we need a 'bunch of them.'       I agree, pretty much  have to temper expectations on Speed being from a small school.  He did really improve on STs last year and he got his praise any time Ballard or any coaches spoke about him.  I get the feeling Ballard and staff are willing to use patience with project players (Ballard states that fairly regularly).  With Oke, Walker, Leonard and then Franklin who has more playing experience at LB - I don't think there was really much need to rush Speed into an LB role last year.  He got plenty of ST snaps and did well there, hopefully boosting his confidence that he can play at NFL level while still refining his LB technique in practices and the film room.     While I would rather see guys like Adams and Glasgow on STs - I don't think it is terrible to have them on the roster primarily as STers but being our 5th and 6th ranked LBs on the depth chart as well.  Meaning, if we went into the season with Leonard, Oke, Speed and Franklin as our top 4 with Adams and Glasgow as STers but listed as 5 and 6 on depth chart, I don't think it'd be the worst thing (especially considering we predominantly play with only 2 LBers on the field).  So, sure it'd be nice to bring in a mid-late round draft pick or sign a decent FA for fairly cheap, but I'd rather see us dishing out money to bring in a solid LT, a playmaker at TE (and maybe WR), retain Rhodes, ensure the DL was solid (either by bringing back Houston and Autry or by getting a guy like Bud Dupree/JJ Watt/etc.), and add OL depth.  In otherwords, regardless of if we bring Walker back or not, I don't think LB is a top 5 position of concern right now.   I don't think Walker is going to command a ton, but he was 15th in the NFL in tackles in 2018 (124), tied for 28th (105) in 2019 and in the top 50 in 2020 (92).  He's a pretty productive player and a solid one - so he's going to demand significantly more than he was getting as a 5th round pick on his rookie contract.  And yes, he definitely wants to play more and I think his biggest issue here is his lack of athleticism.  You're right, he'll probably play more in a 3-4 D and he will likely be offered more money by a team where he'll play a lot than what Ballard will offer him.    See the last line from Ballard in this article:  https://www.colts.com/news/chris-ballard-philip-rivers-ty-hilton-xavier-rhodes-2020-season-press-conference (Ballard on Linebacker Anthony Walker: "I have a special relationship with Anthony Walker. Selfless. Team guy. Rare leader. I hope he gets into coaching one day or scouting. Mark my words on this: if Anthony Walker gets into coaching, he will be a head football coach in the National Football League. And if he gets into scouting, he'll be a general manager. He's brilliant — absolutely brilliant, and he's made of the right stuff. I know Anthony wants to play more. We value Anthony. We'll see how it works out. I want good for Anthony."   My guess is Walker is gone.  
    • It's basically just monitoring one thread (general thread), then updating the big board and pick thread with every pick. So 32ish real time updates per night. Not hard, just tedious.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...