Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

LucasOilStadium

Colts Vs. Titans Game Day Thread

Recommended Posts

Sorry. The o-line hasn't helped one bit.

Get out of here with that. Tired of hearing it. He's not a good running back, plain and simple. 20 attempts 47 yards, and a vultured 1yard TD that anyone could've scored on. He's nothing special. If he has to have the best case scenario every single play in order to be worth anything, he's wasn't worth the draft pick then. I'm just tired of this staff trying to justify the GM's stupid trade by forcing him on the offense. We won today, but against good teams, it will come back to bite us

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lucks numbers, today, and all year-

 

Passing CP/AT YDS TD INT A. Luck

 

              29/41  393    4   1

 

Comp     ATT      %      Yds     TD     INT       yd/gm

115         167     68.9   1305     13      4         328

 

I don't know why, but I thought he had 14 TDs. I made the same mistake last week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The commentator just said something incredibly offensive & the other guy chuckling made it even more uncomfortable.

Context is important. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a conspiracy, the line doesn't help Richardson. They only like Bradshaw and Boom.

 

Here you go again.

 

Bradshaw didn't get running lanes either. Garbage time with Boom is pretty irrelevant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a conspiracy, the line doesn't help Richardson. They only like Bradshaw and Boom.

 

yeah because the titans defense is playing with 110% right now down 24 points with 4 minutes left...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Richardson was running in garbage time too. So the defense folded up their tents and gave up when they seen Richardson was out ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no context in which what he said is acceptable. He should be in big trouble for that.

 

I don't even know what he was talking about. I didn't think it had any derogatory meaning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no context in which what he said is acceptable. He should be in big trouble for that.

Why? "Ching Ching" was being used in reference to a noise, not an Asian. Or did I hear it wrong? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ravens put up a big game today against the Panthers.

 

Should be a great game next week!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't even know what he was talking about. I didn't think it had any derogatory meaning.

I heard something about the founder of the internet and Ali Baba?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't even know what he was talking about. I didn't think it had any derogatory meaning.

  

Why? "Ching Ching" was being used in reference to a noise, not an Asian. Or did I hear it wrong?

It would probably be considered as being an inappropriate joke over here just as a view from the UK.

Whether that's too PC is another matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard something about the founder of the internet and Ali Baba?

Maybe he meant "Cha Ching"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree with your logic.  But it is the same logic some people are using for the converse.  We have young receivers and no Funchess, so no one is open.
    • Not trying to start an argument. I'm only pointing out that you are essentially drawing a conclusion based on assumptions.   1) ........receivers are fast 2) ........QB makes few attempts 3).........the box is stacked   So, Brissett must be missing open receivers downfield.   I'm sure he misses some. But how many compared to other QBs?  ....  We don't really know.         
    • SO your contention is that teams leave Ebron open because of his drops?
    • No more than someone being convicted and imprisoned when it's obvious the police force engaged in improper procedure.   I guess the issue here is that I can see the world outside my own head better than a lot of people.  And I know a little more about physics than the average bear, simply from boredom clicks that turned into self directed study sessions.    The idea that the balls were below PSI because the air was cold and cold air is denser and reduces air pressure, makes a lot more sense to me than some nefarious conspiracy, especially because the Colts' balls were also just barely under PSI, and we all know Andrew Luck doesn't cheat.   The way I had it explained to me is the Patriots keep their balls at the low end of the allowed PSI limit at room temperature.  Throw in a super cold January evening that was way below room temperature and the nefarious becomes the inevitable.  That's why the Colts' balls were also low, because air cold enough to shrink a Patriots ball will shrink a Colts ball too.    The reason that the Colts' balls had higher PSI is that they started higher -- Colts don't push the lower edge of the PSI limit.  Also the Colts balls were tested later, after things had a chance to warm up and normalize   If it was Manning or Luck being accused none of us would have been satisfied with the standard of "proof" on display.    there might just barely be enough actual evidence to get the equipment people themselves on something, if you completely ignore the way temperature affects air pressure, but the evidence tying any of that directly back to Brady is practically nonexistent.   They would have had a better reason to suspend either of Robert Kraft or Bill Belichick than Tom Brady.  Both of them have more authority over the equipment personnel than the starting QB does and at least you could get them on the commander clause. '   All they have on Brady is that he destroyed his phone after they said they didn't want it and before they changed their minds and decided they did
    • I was going to respond to each point but it's not really worth it so I will just say, the fact that he was suspended and fined was not proof enough for you?
  • Members

    • krunk

      krunk 11,708

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • egg

      egg 791

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • runthepost

      runthepost 721

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • anunnakidna

      anunnakidna 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Btown_Colt

      Btown_Colt 431

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 139

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Qwiz

      Qwiz 3,722

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 2,016

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • davidshoff

      davidshoff 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 1959Colts

      1959Colts 2,104

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...