Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

1yrdandacloudofdust

Denver CB Harris says Wilson is better than Luck [Merge]

Recommended Posts

Actually Pats fans get a good laugh out of the Spygate crowd.

And people can say what they like about Brady. Pats fans know football and are quite secure.

lmao

Yeah all the Pats fans on here love when Spygate is mention. Clearly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How is this thread not about Brady vs Manning yet? You guys are losing your edge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

especially considering the entire staff was fired at seasons end

 

4778093.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gotcha. But still there is the possibility to do it in football or any other sport. I actually think it goes on far more than we realize. Owners and GMs are smart people. They know how much "the guy" will not only help them win but also be a marketing gold mind especially in a sport like football which is the most popular.

 

There's a difference between wanting Andrew Luck (duh, who wouldn't want Andrew Luck?) and purposely losing games to get him. One is common sense, the other is completely contrary to the competitive balance the league strives to maintain. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a difference between wanting Andrew Luck (duh, who wouldn't want Andrew Luck?) and purposely losing games to get him. One is common sense, the other is completely contrary to the competitive balance the league strives to maintain. 

I agree but it goes on in every sport.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree but it goes on in every sport.

 

I'm sorry, but you have to prove a claim like that. Your own incredulity isn't proof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, but you have to prove a claim like that. Your own incredulity isn't proof.

You and this proof. Ay! Look, no team is going to come out and say they are doing it. We all know this. But at times the handwriting is on the wall. Read Yehoodi's posts a few pages back. He did a nice job showcasing it happening both in the NBA with the spurs and NHL with the penguins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't read the whole thread.

Luck is far more better than Wilson.

First year - played most of the season with no head coach - 11 games won

2nd year- lots of players injured, no Reggie Wayne - 11 games won

No defense, a blah running game. Luck is carrying the team on his back and did so for the last 2 years

Yea no head coach. Just the coach of the year. Sorry I just see this as a silly reason to say why he is better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You and this proof. Ay! Look, no team is going to come out and say they are doing it. We all know this. But at times the handwriting is on the wall. Read Yehoodi's posts a few pages back. He did a nice job showcasing it happening both in the NBA with the spurs and NHL with the penguins.

 

Criminals don't usually confess their crimes. You have to prove it.

 

I think if you make a claim like this, you should be able to prove it. I don't see what's so unreasonable about that. I know you've stated several times that this is just your opinion, and that's fair. But you've gone right back to stating it as fact (see above: "it goes on in every sport," as if this is a foregone conclusion that everyone should accept). 

 

Take any NFL team, not just the 2011 Colts, and prove that they purposely tanked games (whether it happens in other leagues isn't really material, as those leagues are vastly different and entirely separate from the NFL). Present some evidence that hasn't already been debunked. Make a real case for this.

 

Or not. I'm just saying, like I've always said, that just because you believe something in your heart of hearts doesn't make it true. That's why claims need to be proved. And appeals to authority, appeals to the majority, black-or-white propositions, straw man arguments, etc., are not evidence, and certainly don't prove anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Criminals don't usually confess their crimes. You have to prove it.

 

I think if you make a claim like this, you should be able to prove it. I don't see what's so unreasonable about that. I know you've stated several times that this is just your opinion, and that's fair. But you've gone right back to stating it as fact (see above: "it goes on in every sport," as if this is a foregone conclusion that everyone should accept). 

 

Take any NFL team, not just the 2011 Colts, and prove that they purposely tanked games (whether it happens in other leagues isn't really material, as those leagues are vastly different and entirely separate from the NFL). Present some evidence that hasn't already been debunked. Make a real case for this.

 

Or not. I'm just saying, like I've always said, that just because you believe something in your heart of hearts doesn't make it true. That's why claims need to be proved. And appeals to authority, appeals to the majority, black-or-white propositions, straw man arguments, etc., are not evidence, and certainly don't prove anything.

I have stated ad nauseam my reasons for believing why the Colts tanked (you disagree and that is fine) and as I said, Yehoodi made strong cases for both the Spurs in the NBA and the Penguins in the NHL. I agree with him as well. You can choose to believe that tanking has never gone in professional sports if you want because all that will satisfy you is if an org admits which will never happen. You can live within that utopia if you want but I believe otherwise. We can just leave it at that. It really does not bother me that much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't read the whole thread.

 

Luck is far more better than Wilson.

 

First year - played most of the season with no head coach - 11 games won

2nd year-  lots of players injured, no Reggie Wayne - 11 games won

 

No defense, a blah running game. Luck is carrying the team on his back and did so for the last 2 years

 

 

That settles it. Time to close the thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have stated ad nauseam my reasons for believing why the Colts tanked (you disagree and that is fine) and as I said, Yehoodi made strong cases for both the Spurs in the NBA and the Penguins in the NHL. I agree with him as well. You can choose to believe that tanking has never gone in professional sports if you want because all that will satisfy you is if an org admits which will never happen. You can live within that utopia if you want but I believe otherwise. We can just leave it at that. It really does not bother me that much not sure why it bothers you so much.

 

To the first bolded, like I said, present some evidence that hasn't already been debunked. 

 

To the second bolded, neither the Spurs nor the Penguins play in the NFL.

 

To the third, I'm asking for evidence related to any NFL team. Even if tanking happens in other leagues, that doesn't mean it happens in all leagues. Just prove that it has ever happened in the NFL.

 

Fourth, I don't need the organization to admit it. That's silly, and is completely ignoring what I said. Again, criminals don't always admit their wrongs. I'm asking you to build a case that's based on something more than supposition and logical fallacies.

 

Lastly, as I said earlier, you keep stating this as if it's verified fact. As long as you do that, I'll ask you to prove it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To the first bolded, like I said, present some evidence that hasn't already been debunked. 

 

To the second bolded, neither the Spurs nor the Penguins play in the NFL.

 

To the third, I'm asking for evidence related to any NFL team. Even if tanking happens in other leagues, that doesn't mean it happens in all leagues. Just prove that it has ever happened in the NFL.

 

Fourth, I don't need the organization to admit it. That's silly, and is completely ignoring what I said. Again, criminals don't always admit their wrongs. I'm asking you to build a case that's based on something more than supposition and logical fallacies.

 

Lastly, as I said earlier, you keep stating this as if it's verified fact. As long as you do that, I'll ask you to prove it.

To the first bolded - lol. nothing has been debunked.

 

So you are willing to admit that the other pro leagues tank but not the NFL? Do you know how ridiculous that sounds?

 

To the bolded second - I keep saying it is MY opinion. You choose to read that as fact. I have no idea why.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree but it goes on in every sport. - a stated fact

 

I agree but I bet it goes on in every sport. - a stated opinion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To the first bolded - lol. nothing has been debunked.

 

So you are willing to admit that the other pro leagues tank but not the NFL? Do you know how ridiculous that sounds?

 

To the bolded second - I keep saying it is MY opinion. You choose to read that as fact. I have no idea why.

 

Actually, it's all been debunked. Summarily.

 

I didn't admit anything about other pro leagues. I said they are immaterial. If teams in other pro leagues have tanked, that proves nothing about the NFL. If teams in other pro leagues haven't tanked, that proves nothing about the NFL. They are in other, different, separate leagues. 

 

You have a way of stating your opinion as if it's verified fact, ie, "it goes on in every sport." Again, as long as you do that, I'm going to ask you to prove your claim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, it's all been debunked. Summarily.

 

I didn't admit anything about other pro leagues. I said they are immaterial. If teams in other pro leagues have tanked, that proves nothing about the NFL. If teams in other pro leagues haven't tanked, that proves nothing about the NFL. They are in other, different, separate leagues. 

 

You have a way of stating your opinion as if it's verified fact, ie, "it goes on in every sport." Again, as long as you do that, I'm going to ask you to prove your claim.

It has not been debunked at all but rather enforced IMO. I will use "IMO' from now on so there is not confusion about opinion vs fact.

 

The 2011 Colts are the best NFL example IMO or should I say "the most obvious" IMO similar to the Spurs in b-ball and the Penguins in the NHL, again IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It has not been debunked at all but rather enforced IMO. I will use "IMO' from now on so there is not confusion about opinion vs fact.

 

The 2011 Colts are the best NFL example IMO or should I say "the most obvious" IMO similar to the Spurs in b-ball and the Penguins in the NHL, again IMO.

 

That's rich. Like, double chocolate mousse mixed with chocolate sauce, rich. 

 

But yes, if you had said "IMO," I wouldn't have gone down this road.

 

Last thing, every so-called evidence regarding the 2011 Colts has been debunked, as none of them stand up to even the smallest amount of scrutiny. Every single argument in favor of the tanking claim is based on conjecture, and they all evaporate like dew on the grass, just as soon as you shed a little bit of light on them. Anyone can go back and read the debate in this very thread to see this in action, or go back to the many threads on this over the last two years, and it will be very obvious. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just like Washington tanked for RG3.... Oh wait.

Also it is worthless to tank in the NBA anymore. There is a reason why some leagues device systems to discourage this practice. The NFL has never had to worry about this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I still have a hard time believing this. Rest in peace Kobe. Prayers for Kobe's and the other victim's families of this awful tragedy.
    • Any one else catch the parts about Chad Kelly. About how he has to show them they can trust him off the field? I’m not pushing for Chad Kelly as our next Qb, but I found that part interesting. Almost makes me wonder IF he’s not gonna get his shot at the starting job regardless of FA or the Draft results.
    • Burrow was not thought of this highly early(when Ballard was rumored to like Herbert and Love). It was kind of an avalanche that was gaining more and more mass and power the more games got played. I don't think it was until November-December that people started talking about Burrow as a no. 1 pick. He just never had that body of work before this year and a lot of his most impressive games and against best opponents were at the end of the year.        I've heard Brady thrown around, but no idea if there is anything real behind those rumors. The rumors say that they are having hard time attracting any fans to their games and their owners think getting a legend like Brady to play for several years for them might jump start their new fanbase in LA. No idea whether to believe this or not. 
    • To me being a boom or bust is kind of a plus for a QB, because the worst you can be is mediocre once that rookie contract comes to an end. I would prefer for whoever we draft to be either great or horrible and for us to know relatively quickly so we can either invest in him or move on quickly. This is part of the appeal with Love for me. The things he needs to improve are heavily coaching based and I think we will have a good idea of where on the spectrum he will end up pretty quickly. For example - if you draft him and he's not ready to start by year 2, this is a red flag and you might start looking for another one. If 2 off-seasons and 1 in-season period are not enough for your coaching staff to get him ready you either have made a mistake with the draft pick or with your coaching staff and I do have good trust in the coaching staff so... 
    • For me the tiers are more important the the specific ranking... I rank players within a tier very similarly and even though I would have preferences within them, I don't feel strongly enough to argue one over the other.    Tier 1(sell the farm for him - i.e. multiple 1sts, multiple day 2 picks, etc) Burrow   Tier 2 (trade a significant asset for him - i.e. a future 1st round pick) Tua(if I have medical guarantees he'd be alright health-wise)   Tier 3 (trade a medium level asset for him(i.e. a second, a third...) or take him at #13) Love Herbert Tua(if our medical staff cannot give you any guarantees whatsoever either way -for example, there were some reports that it might be too early before the draft to tell whether he will be good or not)   Tier 4 (second round) Eason Fromm     Tier 5 (third-fourth round) Gordon(have to do more work on him, might change his ranking) Hurts   Tier 6 (round 5-7) Tua(if the medicals come bad and there is high risk of reinjury/retirement/not full recovery/etc.) Tyler Huntley Nate Stanley     I'm still watching some QBs so that's not my final ranking. 
  • Members

    • MikeCurtis

      MikeCurtis 1,742

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nickster

      Nickster 329

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pacolts56

      pacolts56 3,712

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 1,047

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • mirobi48

      mirobi48 34

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colt.45

      Colt.45 87

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 22

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • indykmj

      indykmj 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 6,920

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MarquisJ

      MarquisJ 425

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...