Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Denver CB Harris says Wilson is better than Luck [Merge]


1yrdandacloudofdust

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 662
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't want to rehash all the tanking talk. Suffice to say that I think they did tank. Indy reporters did as well as national reporters. There were several games were the game plans were not there or the effort from the players. Remember the Saints shellacking? We can just agree to disagree.

This argument is so absurd. If the management had decided to tank i doubt they would have all been fired. Polian would have certainly said by now that Irsay told them to tank Think a little bit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This argument is so absurd. If the management had decided to tank i doubt they would have all been fired. Polian would have certainly said by now that Irsay told them to tank Think a little bit

You need to think a bi there. Polian knew he was gone as soon as Manning had his fourth neck surgery. He was not going to be the GM post-Manning. Tanking goes on all the time in sports and people in positions of power understand the game. When a once in a generation pick is sitting there, you get him. Everyone that was fired from the Colts found employment elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to think a bi there. Polian knew he was gone as soon as Manning had his fourth neck surgery. He was not going to be the GM post-Manning. Tanking goes on all the time in sports and people in positions of power understand the game. When a once in a generation pick is sitting there, you get him. Everyone that was fired from the Colts found employment elsewhere.

No Polian didn't know. He and peyton have said as much. Polian was with peyton in the training room when he was summoned to Irsays office. Management did not tank the season. The final week of the season almost cost them the number one pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They tanked without question and Colts fans were quite proud about it at the time. It was Ryan Grigson's call and part of Chuck Pagano's deal. Wink wink. Lets not kid ourselves. The Colts sold their soul for a top of the second tier QB.  

 

 

Polian (shady as they come) and a lame duck Caldwell.Pleeeeeease. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Polian (shady as they come) and a lame duck Caldwell.Pleeeeeease.

Polian has been given the chance on ESPN to admit to tanking the season and has not. He is pretty bitter about being fired and I'm sure would have hinted at the very least that irsay told him to tank. Not to mention they won two of their last three and almost cost them the pick

And Caldwell was still under contract so no he wasn't a lame duck coach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Polian didn't know. He and peyton have said as much. Polian was with peyton in the training room when he was summoned to Irsays office. Management did not tank the season. The final week of the season almost cost them the number one pick

What do you expect Polian to say? Again, Irsay's decision and as an owner he would have been a fool to not get Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Polian has been given the chance on ESPN to admit to tanking the season and has not. He is pretty bitter about being fired and I'm sure would have hinted at the very least that irsay told him to tank. Not to mention they won two of their last three and almost cost them the pick

And Caldwell was still under contract so no he wasn't a lame duck coach

Polian was not being fired for 2011 solely but the seasons prior. As you guys so often like to remind me, the Colts were declining for years before Manning's neck gave out and he was singlehandedly willing them to the post-season season after season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Proper care of a Colts fan:

1. Don't get them wet.

2. Don't feed them after midnight.

3. Don't suggest that effort was lacking in 2011.

4. Don't opine that anyone is better than their QB.

;) :thmup:

Change Colts fan to Pats fan.

Change 3 to "Don't ever mention Spygate. Literally ever."

And I think you're on to something here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Proper care of a Colts fan:

 

1. Don't get them wet.

2. Don't feed them after midnight.

3. Don't suggest that effort was lacking in 2011.

4. Don't opine that anyone is better than their QB.

 

;)  :thmup:

Isn't that pretty much the same thing for Pats fans, except change #3 to something about recording practices of your opponent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Polian was not being fired for 2011 solely but the seasons prior. As you guys so often like to remind me, the Colts were declining for years before Manning's neck gave out and he was singlehandedly willing them to the post-season season after season.

 

 

A serious congratulation to you on this post. You have flooded this 15 page piece of garbage thread with posts. Finally you have one that rings true. Imagine 15 pages that started with some * CB that was just beaten by a team and said that QB was better than the one his team beat two weeks ago. I mean great sample size there buddy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Polian was not being fired for 2011 solely but the seasons prior. As you guys so often like to remind me, the Colts were declining for years before Manning's neck gave out and he was singlehandedly willing them to the post-season season after season.

Ok, what does that have to do with tanking? Polian didn't tell the coaches and players to tank so they could draft a rookie qb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A serious congratulation to you on this post. You have flooded this 15 page piece of garbage thread with posts. Finally you have one that rings true. Imagine 15 pages that started with some * CB that was just beaten by a team and said that QB was better than the one his team beat two weeks ago. I mean great sample size there buddy. 

Yeah, the Denver CB was just bitter. He was never asked about Luck which is the part that was interesting. He offered that up himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the Denver CB was just bitter. He was never asked about Luck which is the part that was interesting. He offered that up himself.

 

 

I would love to be able to wager about 50K with these few Seattle fans that resounded that Wilson is indeed better. The bet could simply be decided with a question to the 32 football GM's. Simply ask the question "who would be the player you would start your franchise with." I'd even give the Seattle guys the benefit of the doubt and let Luck go against the rest of the younger players in the NFL. I have a feeling at this point in time probably upwards of 25 out of 32 would be a safe bet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to be able to wager about 50K with these few Seattle fans that resounded that Wilson is indeed better. The bet could simply be decided with a question to the 32 football GM's. Simply ask the question "who would be the player you would start your franchise with." I'd even give the Seattle guys the benefit of the doubt and let Luck go against the rest of the younger guys in the NFL. I have a feeling at this point in time probably upwards of 25 out of 32 would be a safe bet.

I get what you saying but NFL GMs are wrong all the time. At this point, it is obvious that Wilson should have been taken in the first round yet he fell to third. I do think you are right that the GMs right now would take Luck but I guess time will ultimately prove who is better. Luck is off to a scorching start this season and of course Wilson had the big comeback vs Denver. It will be fun to watch it play out.

 

It is ironic that discussion is taking place with Luck and Wilson and not RG. Who would have thought that back in 2012?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Change Colts fan to Pats fan.

Change 3 to "Don't ever mention Spygate. Literally ever."

And I think you're on to something here.

 

Isn't that pretty much the same thing for Pats fans, except change #3 to something about recording practices of your opponent?

 

Well of course... duh.  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get what you saying but NFL GMs are wrong all the time. At this point, it is obvious that Wilson should have been taken in the first round yet he fell to third. I do think you are right that the GMs right now would take Luck but I guess time will ultimately prove who is better. Luck is off to a scorching start this season and of course Wilson had the big comeback vs Denver. It will be fun to watch it play out.

 

It is ironic that discussion is taking place with Luck and Wilson and not RG. Who would have thought that back in 2012?

 

 

If the GM's don't have the answer , then not worth even discussing. Who would know better than smart people that spend 24-7 evaluating talent ? Wilson for sure is good , very good. But he really didn't "fall" to the 3rd. I never once saw him projected to go as high as round 2. Kiper and PPW had him 4th or even 5th. So getting technical on you... can't fall from the top od a ladder from a rung in the middle. 

 

Anyway there is just no way teams are going to draft 5'11" inch QB's in the first round. It's just very seldom that they succeed in today's NFL. Even as good as Wilson is , you often can see how it hurts him. All that running around keeping plays alive is often due to the fact that he can't see the whole field. But as you say , the guy was a steal and if they did a re-draft he would be 1.2. I think what makes him a lot different from other QB's that short is the fact that he has hands uncommonly big for a guy of that stature. So this makes for him to have a better arm than most others that tried to play the position at 5'11".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to think a bi there. Polian knew he was gone as soon as Manning had his fourth neck surgery. He was not going to be the GM post-Manning. Tanking goes on all the time in sports and people in positions of power understand the game. When a once in a generation pick is sitting there, you get him. Everyone that was fired from the Colts found employment elsewhere.

If tanking was in mind, they would have gone 0-16. There were 2 other teams who were close to no 1 draft pick till the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the GM's don't have the answer , then not worth even discussing. Who would know better than smart people that spend 24-7 evaluating talent ? Wilson for sure is good , very good. But he really didn't "fall" to the 3rd. I never once saw him projected to go as high as round 2. Kiper and PPW had him 4th or even 5th. So getting technical on you... can't fall from the top od a ladder from a rung in the middle. 

 

Anyway there is just no way teams are going to draft 5'11" inch QB's in the first round. It's just very seldom that they succeed in today's NFL. Even as good as Wilson is , you often can see how it hurts him. All that running around keeping plays alive is often due to the fact that he can't see the whole field. But as you say , the guy was a steal and if they did a re-draft he would be 1.2. I think what makes him a lot different from other QB's that short is the fact that he has hands uncommonly big for a guy of that stature. So this makes for him to have a better arm than most others that tried to play the position at 5'11".

I don't know if it is always that black and white. If we are just going on the physical abilities then of course Luck is better hands down. But a you know, the QB position is based as much, maybe more so on the cerebral. So, taking that into account, I think Wilson measures very high on the mental side even if his physical abilities are not up to Luck's stature. At this point, he is the more sound QB than Luck. He makes less mistakes, is more efficient, and plays very good situationally. In other words, he does everything to help your team win ball games. Luck does those things but just not as consistently as Wilson and has a penchant for turning the ball over and taking too long to find the open receiver. And of course, Wilson does play on the better team too but you get my drift.

 

I still think it is too early but really, kudos to Wilson for what he has achieved already as an undersized third round pick. To even be in this discussion is a credit to him given like I said, we all thought it would be Luck/RG for the next decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if it is always that black and white. If we are just going on the physical abilities then of course Luck is better hands down. But a you know, the QB position is based as much, maybe more so on the cerebral. So, taking that into account, I think Wilson measures very high on the mental side even if his physical abilities are not up to Luck's stature. At this point, he is the more sound QB than Luck. He makes less mistakes, is more efficient, and plays very good situationally. In other words, he does everything to help your team win ball games. Luck does those things but just not as consistently as Wilson and has a penchant for turning the ball over and taking too long to find the open receiver. And of course, Wilson does play on the better team too but you get my drift.

 

I still think it is too early but really, kudos to Wilson for what he has achieved already as an undersized third round pick. To even be in this discussion is a credit to him given like I said, we all thought it would be Luck/RG for the next decade.

 

 

 

Argument can be made for the above. BUT....if when you are asked to do a lot less , you can look very "mistake free " and smart. I would love to see Wilson's turnover rate if he was behind Samson Satele executing Bruce Arian's game plan in 2012. Also , sometime the "open receiver" is not open. Also to say that " has a penchant for turning the ball over " is kinda unfair as your basing that off 2 playoff games that the Colts were way behind in. Plus a few of those were bad routes run by inexperienced WR's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Argument can be made for the above. BUT....if when you are asked to do a lot less , you can look very "mistake free " and smart. I would love to see Wilson's turnover rate if he was behind Samson Satele executing Bruce Arian's game plan in 2012. Also , sometime the "open receiver" is not open. 

That is valid. But I would counter that Seattle does not have a very good offense especially compared with the weapons that Luck has this year. Wilson also missed his best receiver in Harvin all of last year until the post-season. But he does have that great defense which goes a long way.

 

I guess I would ask you this, what in his game would make you believe that he could not do more if asked?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is valid. But I would counter that Seattle does not have a very good offense especially compared with the weapons that Luck has this year. Wilson also missed his best receiver in Harvin all of last year until the post-season. But he does have that great defense which goes a long way.

 

I guess I would ask you this, what in his game would make you believe that he could not do more if asked?

 

 

Are Luke's "weapons" really that wonderful ? Sluggish running game and when Montcrief is not on the field they can rotate S help to Hilton and you have Nicks , Wayne or a TE that has to get separation. But yeah .. I think he's got better receivers than Wilson. And yes , I think Wilson could do more if asked. He's a really god QB .. no doubt. My point is that Luck will be throwing more balls that maybe he shouldn't as a result of he needs to put more points up the Wilson does. Right now Wilson has 1 int. I'm saying if he played for the Colts , he would probably have more than that. He would also have more TD passes and more yards. Just saying that  when more of a teams success is put on the QB , he has to gamble a bit more.. play less conservative. This obviously makes for more turnovers than the guy that has a great defense and that team ALSO uses the run to set up the pass. Don't know how much you see of the Colts but sometimes defenses just ignore a Luck play action and continue straight to him. I think Pep and Chuck finally just agreed to have the pass set up the run...  Just so different. And like I say , if you disregard the 2 play off games where I bet truth be known , half those ints were on the receiver .. it's statically crazy to say Luck is a high turnover QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are Luke's "weapons" really that wonderful ? Sluggish running game and when Montcrief is not on the field they can rotate S help to Hilton and you have Nicks , Wayne or a TE that has to get separation. But yeah .. I think he's got better receivers than Wilson. And yes , I think Wilson could do more if asked. He's a really god QB .. no doubt. My point is that Luck will be throwing more balls that maybe he shouldn't as a result of he needs to put more points up the Wilson does. Right now Wilson has 1 int. I'm saying if he played for the Colts , he would probably have more than that. He would also have more TD passes and more yards. Just saying that  when more of a teams success is put on the QB , he has to gamble a bit more.. play less conservative. This obviously makes for more turnovers than the guy that has a great defense and that team ALSO uses the run to set up the pass. Don't know how much you see of the Colts but sometimes defenses just ignore a Luck play action and continue straight to him. I think Pep and Chuck finally just agreed to have the pass set up the run...  Just so different. And like I say , if you disregard the 2 play off games where I bet truth be known , half those ints were on the receiver .. it's statically crazy to say Luck is a high turnover QB.

Yes, having the D is huge for Wilson. That being said, his D is ranked 14 right now in points allowed and they are at 2-1 with a win over Denver. I guess we will have to see how it plays out but I think he will end up having to do more this year.

 

I can't figure out your offensively philosophy for the life of me. Against Denver you go as conservative as possible and then on Sunday you do an onside kick and have Luck flinging it like he is Marino. I have always felt that the Colts are in no man's land. I think they want to ride Luck but Irsay was so bent on the Colts not winning in a Manning-like fashion that they have tried to establish a run game that is not there in terms of the RB or the line. I don't get it. I wonder if Luck's first year with Arians spooked them when he threw all the picks and took all the hits and they decided to reel it in but really dome teams have to be all out with the O. And you have the QB and skill guys to do it. The defense looks like it is still a work in progress. Do you like the defensive moves Grig's has done? I just don't see a lot of talent on that side of the ball outside of Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They tanked without question and Colts fans were quite proud about it at the time. It was Ryan Grigson's call and part of Chuck Pagano's deal. Wink wink. Lets not kid ourselves. The Colts sold their soul for a top of the second tier QB.  

I have a hard time believing that professional athletes would purposely go along with "tanking" a season. I can understand fans not disapproving of it if they thought there was a reward for doing so, though.

Players all have a pretty strong ego. None of them would purposely let other players beat them and make them look mediocre or worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, having the D is huge for Wilson. That being said, his D is ranked 14 right now in points allowed and they are at 2-1 with a win over Denver. I guess we will have to see how it plays out but I think he will end up having to do more this year.

 

I can't figure out your offensively philosophy for the life of me. Against Denver you go as conservative as possible and then on Sunday you do an onside kick and have Luck flinging it like he is Marino. I have always felt that the Colts are in no man's land. I think they want to ride Luck but Irsay was so bent on the Colts not winning in a Manning-like fashion that they have tried to establish a run game that is not there in terms of the RB or the line. I don't get it. I wonder if Luck's first year with Arians spooked them when he threw all the picks and took all the hits and they decided to reel it in but really dome teams have to be all out with the O. And you have the QB and skill guys to do it. The defense looks like it is still a work in progress. Do you like the defensive moves Grig's has done? I just don't see a lot of talent on that side of the ball outside of Davis.

The defense wouldn't look nearly as bad if there was a better rush LB. The loss of Mathis for the year crippled the unit in that regard, as so far, Werner has been the marquee whiff of the Grigson regime. The D line isn't going to light the world on fire, but it's rock solid and performs it's job as well as you could hope (sometimes better). When Freeman is back and healthy, the ILB's are in the same position. Walden is having a great year so far at OLB, and the corners are arguably one of the most talented groups in that position in the league.

 

Really it comes down to iffy safety and rush LB play, which leaves the coverage linebackers 1v1 vs Tight ends where they get burned, and slow pressure allows the QB to find that TE underneath. Wide receivers are producing at garbage levels against Indy because of the superlative corner play, but that's largely negated by the previous sentence.

 

So overall, because of the way the defensive scheme is set up, and the lack of production from one key position, the defense so far has largely been less than the sum of its parts, imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, having the D is huge for Wilson. That being said, his D is ranked 14 right now in points allowed and they are at 2-1 with a win over Denver. I guess we will have to see how it plays out but I think he will end up having to do more this year.

 

I can't figure out your offensively philosophy for the life of me. Against Denver you go as conservative as possible and then on Sunday you do an onside kick and have Luck flinging it like he is Marino. I have always felt that the Colts are in no man's land. I think they want to ride Luck but Irsay was so bent on the Colts not winning in a Manning-like fashion that they have tried to establish a run game that is not there in terms of the RB or the line. I don't get it. I wonder if Luck's first year with Arians spooked them when he threw all the picks and took all the hits and they decided to reel it in but really dome teams have to be all out with the O. And you have the QB and skill guys to do it. The defense looks like it is still a work in progress. Do you like the defensive moves Grig's has done? I just don't see a lot of talent on that side of the ball outside of Davis.

 

 

Your comments on Irsay's probable feelings I think are right on. He was very tired of seeing Luck being hit so often. Plus he for sure thad some pent up OL frustrations from all the Polian blunders attempts at fixing it. I think the Denver game was a result of everything being "off." The offense for sure had not jelled yet. Probably needed more pre season reps. The offensive philosophy appeared to be as you say ... in no man's land and Luck did not play his best. As far as Grigs , man tough to say. When you have that much money to spend in two years , you are going to have some bad signings for sure. Just the nature of the beast. One poster mentions the loss of Mathis . I think if you put Mathis and Arthur Jones on the field right now , you have something pretty acceptable. Although he can be faulted for not having developed a better pass rush minus a 33-34 year old guy. He has at least stopped what was the awful nightmare your team gave to us in January. Put Jones on the field and I don't think teams can cram the ball down our throats anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The defense wouldn't look nearly as bad if there was a better rush LB. The loss of Mathis for the year crippled the unit in that regard, as so far, Werner has been the marquee whiff of the Grigson regime. The D line isn't going to light the world on fire, but it's rock solid and performs it's job as well as you could hope (sometimes better). When Freeman is back and healthy, the ILB's are in the same position. Walden is having a great year so far at OLB, and the corners are arguably one of the most talented groups in that position in the league.

 

Really it comes down to iffy safety and rush LB play, which leaves the coverage linebackers 1v1 vs Tight ends where they get burned, and slow pressure allows the QB to find that TE underneath. Wide receivers are producing at garbage levels against Indy because of the superlative corner play, but that's largely negated by the previous sentence.

 

So overall, because of the way the defensive scheme is set up, and the lack of production from one key position, the defense so far has largely been less than the sum of its parts, imo.

 

 

Good post young man. Pretty much the story as we speak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They tanked without question and Colts fans were quite proud about it at the time. It was Ryan Grigson's call and part of Chuck Pagano's deal. Wink wink. Lets not kid ourselves. The Colts sold their soul for a top of the second tier QB.  

 

 

 

This post wins the award for the most ignorance in the fewest amount of words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Change Colts fan to Pats fan.

Change 3 to "Don't ever mention Spygate. Literally ever."

And I think you're on to something here.

 

Actually Pats fans get a good laugh out of the Spygate crowd.

 

And people can say what they like about Brady. Pats fans know football and are quite secure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I knew I had a favorite last year, but I thought I would be good with whoever the Colts picked... and this was until the odds for the Colts picking Levis hit -4000 or something of the sort about half an hour before the draft and my heart completely dropped. In a way I'm happy the odds-makers completely missed on this one... it showed me how I really felt about those players and made me even more appreciative for us drafting Richardson an hour later.    So... you would be good with any of them... but who do you REALLY want?    On your question... if I had to guess, most Colts fans haven't watched this QB draft extensively. I know I haven't. So his statistical profile doesn't scream 1st rounder so... possibly why not many people really like him. 
    • My sleepers: (meaning, the kind of players coaches would like to have, more than what consensus big board gives credit to them. Some of them might need couple of years to attain their high potential, if drafted into suitable coaching environment, so a lot depends on that. Some of them have injury concerns too).   Most of them are high IQ players or high-effort, high-motor players - two traits I look for from the Drafted players, list is long but I like these guys.. gonna be interesting to see where they land and how it works out for them in long run.    Payton Wilson, LB, NC State Caelen Carson, CB, Wake Forest Kiran Amegadjie, OT, Yale Maason Smith, IDL, LSU Christian Mahogany, OG, Boston College Max Melton, CB, Rutgers Zak Zinter, OG, Michigan Bucky Irving, RB, Oregon Khyree Jackson, CB Oregon Dylan McMahon, C, NC State (good fit for Browns)  Tykee Smith, SAF, Georgia Ainias Smith, WR, Texas A&M Cam Hart, CB, Notre Dame Michael Barrett, LB Michigan Malachi Corley, WR, Western Kentucky Beaux Limmer, IOL, Arkansas   Kamren Kinchens, S, Miami McKinnley Jackson, IDL, Texas A&M Kalen King, CB, Penn State Justin Eboigbe, IDL, Alabama    Jacob Cowing, WR, Arizona Beau Brade, SAF, Maryland Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville Jalyx Hunt, EDGE, Houston Christian (I'm hoping for day 3 Vikings pickup, as Flores could work wonders with him)  Jaheim Bell, TE, Florida State Brennan Jackson, EDGE, Washington State  Delmar Glaze, OT, Maryland Myles Cole, EDGE, Texas Tech Kristian Boyd, DT, Northern Iowa Javontae Jean-Baptiste, DL, Notre Dame Jordan Magee, LB, Temple Myles Harden, CB, South Dakota Jalen Green, EDGE, James Madison (UDFA Target prospect)  Trey Taylor, S, Air Force (UDFA prospect) Eyabi Okie-Anoma, EDGE, Charlotte Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto  Sundiata Anderson, EDGE, Grambling State  Daequan Hardy, CB, Penn State (Special Teams, Returner)  Emani Bailey, RB, TCU   As for Vikings, I don't wanna rush to draft QB if the team isn't confident in the guys they could move up in draft range, and I'd like to just draft impact players that build the roster at this point.   Build the team, draft a franchise QB at right time, don't rush and ruin years trying to make someone work out in the NFL. 
    • If you are relying upon history, does accuracy matter?  I think the reason Smith ended up at RT is because the coaches tried him there out of necessity and he played well, and stayed there due to the coaches wishes.  I don't think that FO guys had much to say about it, because Smith was in fact drafted to be a G, not the RT.  Ballard's own words after day 2 of that draft was that they drafted Smith a bit higher than they had him ranked, because he was the "last remaining starting caliber G on the board".   So it does fit that Smith was not drafted by Ballard or the FO to be a RT...in part because of the measurables and arm length.   Also directing this response to @Matthew Gilbert
    • Same. And that's because over time that level of depth eventually decays. 
    • I don't think players like Davis (and especially Bryan, who I don't think will make the final 53) should impact our draft strategy at all. Not even a little bit. If we like Byron Murphy, figure out what to do with those other guys later. The other versatile guys you mention don't scratch the itch the way Murphy would be expected to -- he should be looked at as a disruptive 3T who plays there every down, not a matchup guy or passing downs guy.    If anything, maybe it's the other way around. The Colts already had a feel for the DTs in draft class and knew they wouldn't get what they want in the draft, so they addressed the position in free agency. And after this weekend, that might help people better understand the strategy at DB and WR...    The bolded really gets at the heart of it. I like Murphy, but I'm not offering him as a great player that you just have to take a chance on. But when it comes to draft strategy, I think taking the best players is the way to go. I'm directly opposed to needs-based drafting, and to passing on a really good prospect because you have backup level veterans already on the roster. 
  • Members

    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 10,816

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,191

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,452

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,303

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pkbrux

      pkbrux 104

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 1,764

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Matthew Gilbert

      Matthew Gilbert 399

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 311

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ChuggaBeer

      ChuggaBeer 1,756

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 153

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...