Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

LucasOilStadium

Colts @ Jaguars Game Day Thread

Recommended Posts

A very poor start for Luck. Didn't throw to wide open receivers twice, overthrows a receiver. He is shaky, again, early. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was there anyone on the left side of the field when Luck stared down the right side?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Already over thrown two wide open receivers ... same old same old ....  getting tired of hearing this guy get hyped up as one of the best and then seeing him make the same mistakes week after week!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Same here.... he retired for valid enough reasons IMO.... but if he has 2nd thoughts and wants to play again I prefer we trade his rights.   How long do we reserve his rights by the way?
    • I am convinced Luck will never play again. I'm disappointed, but I've made my peace with that.   I assume he retired for good reason, and while he technically "quit," I think it's harsh to call him a quitter, as if he's less of a person.    I also don't think I'd ever be able to trust him or commit to him again, if it were up to me. 
    • You didn't specify 2009. And I also follow every ND opponent's (especially Stanford, USC, and scUM) recruiting and seasons very close.   In 2009 he did have Gerhart, Taylor, and Gaffney at RB, Fleener and Ertz (RS) at TE, and Whalen, Owusu, and Baldwin at WR. They certainly were not void of talent. Stanford's recruiting got way better after Harbaugh got there in 2007 but yes, it did take a few years to settle in. If you feel better using 2010 vs TL's 2019, that's fine. The numbers are already close, and TL should have as good or better after his next two games.    
    • Just speaking for myself, I liked my post, and I didn't like your post, so it's not hard for me to understand.   Here's what happened in this thread. OP posted a stat. You derided stats on the basis of "you guys keep using stats to talk about things JB doesn't do well, which means you can't form an opinion for yourself," which is just another way of you trying to show your superior depth or whatever.   No one has ever offered any singular stat as definitive proof that JB "isn't the answer." If they have, that's ridiculous.    You say you agree with the first point. The stat in the OP quantifies it. So what's the problem?
  • Members

    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 2,393

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 35,699

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • LockeDown

      LockeDown 2,300

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Case

      Case 721

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NorthernBlue

      NorthernBlue 3,146

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 563

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shaolin06

      Shaolin06 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pacolts56

      pacolts56 3,440

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Virtuoso80

      Virtuoso80 495

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Balzer40

      Balzer40 4,233

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...