Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

A Question for your Opinion


Reddog

Recommended Posts

I keep asking this but who do you think should be our rush LB.  I through out Freeney as a possibility and got negative responses from individuals who apparently feel they know player personnel.  So I ask you, who should be our rush LB?  Is he on the roster or who can we reach out and get.  Looking for some intelligent responses!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep asking this but who do you think should be our rush LB.  I through out Freeney as a possibility and got negative responses from individuals who apparently feel they know player personnel.  So I ask you, who should be our rush LB?  Is he on the roster or who can we reach out and get.  Looking for some intelligent responses!

see my post in werner. we are going to have two, werner and walden, sunday, sacks are here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Erik Walden/Bjoren Werner...... Get creative

Flip LB's

Let Vontae Shadow the #1 WR & Toler the #2

STOP changing our safeties. Make our defense the traditional FS & SS cause I'm tired of watching Landry in coverage

Get Zach Kerr more snaps

Get a 1-5-5 package going on 3rd & long or obvious passing downs

Chapman as the only D-Lineman & have 5 LB's then 5 DB's

Plenty of things to do with the talent we have to mask our weaknesses but Manusky has to be willing to think outside the box

AND :no: to Freeney!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep asking this but who do you think should be our rush LB.  I through out Freeney as a possibility and got negative responses from individuals who apparently feel they know player personnel.  So I ask you, who should be our rush LB?  Is he on the roster or who can we reach out and get.  Looking for some intelligent responses!

Freeney is getting :lecture: so wasting a draft pick would be just plain silly. Walden is our only hope and I like the idea

of Kerr getting more snaps also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Freeney is getting :lecture: so wasting a draft pick would be just plain silly. Walden is our only hope and I like the idea

of Kerr getting more snaps also.

My guess is Freeney is better than anyone we have including Walden.  If Walden is our only hope, strap yourself in, it's gonna be a long season...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Erik Walden/Bjoren Werner...... Get creative

Flip LB's

Let Vontae Shadow the #1 WR & Toler the #2

STOP changing our safeties. Make our defense the traditional FS & SS cause I'm tired of watching Landry in coverage

Get Zach Kerr more snaps

Get a 1-5-5 package going on 3rd & long or obvious passing downs

Chapman as the only D-Lineman & have 5 LB's then 5 DB's

Plenty of things to do with the talent we have to mask our weaknesses but Manusky has to be willing to think outside the box

AND :no: to Freeney!!!

Great thoughts but my opinion is it's not that easy in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep asking this but who do you think should be our rush LB.  I through out Freeney as a possibility and got negative responses from individuals who apparently feel they know player personnel.  So I ask you, who should be our rush LB?  Is he on the roster or who can we reach out and get.  Looking for some intelligent responses!

 

Unless we're talking stats, everything posted on here is an opinion.

 

For Freeney, we tried him at OLB and he was more comfortable as a 4-3 DE whereas Mathis thrives at OLB.    I think the same issue may be true with Werner as we've seen with other posts.  

 

I think coaches should look at Studebaker as a possibility, at least in practice.  He's great at special teams, although we saw him on the field during preseason at LB, although if memory serves me, on inside LB.  He's about ten pounds lighter than Werner and may be faster, not sure.  Wouldn't be a long term solution but might be an improvement. 

 

They also got Chris Carter (OLB from Pittsburgh).  He was a backup but maybe some playing time might benefit the defense.  Hard to tell.  

 

 

As far as any free agents, I'm not sure. People keep throwing around Michael Sam but he's on a practice squad so I'd doubt his abilities to be any better than what we have now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I through out Freeney as a possibility and got negative responses from individuals who apparently feel they know player personnel.  So I ask you, who should be our rush LB?  Is he on the roster or who can we reach out and get.  Looking for some intelligent responses!

So what you are saying is, I am going to keep doing this until someone agrees with me. Sounds like you are not looking for feedback, you are looking for an audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Freeney is too old. I'm sure he's thinking about retirement this year.

 

Erik Walden and Bjorn Werner will be the rushing line backers. Walden had a good game on Monday getting to Foles, I think they forgot about him since he didn't really rush at all last season. Bjorn has yet to impress me YET, but I hope he gets going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think if the Colts get a WR in the top-50 picks, or so,  I think the Colts would agree with you. 
    • welp, after another week of developments, rumors, and predictions…here is where I stand:   1.  My personal top 5 for our first has not changed.  Mitchell, Arnold, Turner, BTJ, Bowers are still who id be ok with picking at 15.  I’ve said it before, but this is one of the most “it can go any way for us” drafts I’ve witnessed for us in a long time, if not ever.     2.  With the rumors of us looking to trade up, I AM ALL FOR IT.  It’s ok to play it safe and build your team, but that gets mediocrity.  We need to go out and get a guy.  A player we KNOW that will be elite or very good.  Not one that we hope can do that.  I think MHJ is definitely going to the Cards (if they don’t trade out) so that means either Nabers or Odunze who we’re probably trading for if they fall to 8 or 9.  Id prefer Nabers over Odunze.  Nabers is that blazing separator we desperately need, Odunze is possessive beast, but I feel we already have that with MPJ.  I don’t think trading up for bowers would be worth it.     3.  Trading back is an absolute no for me.  As said above, we have to start getting bonafide players and studs.  If we have a chance to get a bonafide stud, then we shouldn’t give it up.  Trading back and giving up the chance to get someone is lowering the talent level of our first pick.  Let’s get aggressive for once and get OUR guy.  If we can’t, let’s stay put and draft a player who will be VERY good.  
    • FYI Castro went back to college at Iowa this upcoming season.  Look for Sebastian in the 2025 NFL Draft.
    • Like most QBs they need a safety blanket to throw to and that can be a TE.  Draft rumor-mill already in full circulation with news that the Colts want to trade up on Day 1.  Still think it's a long shot to draft a legacy in MHJ reaching P4 with the Cardinals.  A trade up to P8 with Atlanta is probably the most realistic scenario and TE Bowers would be the call-in.  Not sold on most of this year's draftable QBs and doubt 4 or more will be drafted within the top-8 picks.  See the draft play out like every other year where teams can stay and get a serviceable QB. 
    • This could very well be the rare year we do trade up on Day 1.  Really shocked if we go after a legacy and the cost might be too rich for the short-term versus draft immediate draft needs.  Now a trade up to say P8 swap with Atlanta has a higher percentage of happening I do feel.  No way going to trade within our division with the Titans at P7.  At P8 should still have one of the top-3 WRs or even better option of drafting a generational TE in Bowers. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...